Article

A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 11/2006; 67(8):1411-20. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000240225.04000.1a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) are involved in pain modulation via descending inhibitory pathways in the brain and spinal cord.
To assess the efficacy of duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of 5-HT and NE, on the reduction of pain severity, as well as secondary outcome measures in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).
In this double-blind study, patients with DPNP and without comorbid depression were randomly assigned to treatment with duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD), duloxetine 60 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the weekly mean score of 24-hour average pain severity on the 11-point Likert scale. Secondary measures and health outcome measures were also assessed.
Duloxetine 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID demonstrated improvement in the management of DPNP and showed rapid onset of action, with separation from placebo beginning at week 1 on the 24-hour average pain severity score. For all secondary measures for pain (except allodynia), mean changes showed an advantage of duloxetine over placebo, with no significant difference between 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID. Clinical Global Impression of Severity and Patient's Global Impression of Improvement evaluation demonstrated greater improvement on duloxetine- vs placebo-treated patients. Duloxetine showed no notable interference on diabetic controls, and both doses were safely administered.
This study confirms previous findings that duloxetine at 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID is effective and safe in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

1 Bookmark
 · 
194 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background In new drug development in neuropathic pain (NeP), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (PCTs) with long treatment durations in a parallel-group design are recommended for confirmatory trials. Objective This study was conducted to identify potential factors contributing to elevated placebo response in parallel-group PCTs for oral drugs with at least a 4-week treatment duration. Methods A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE and EMBASE, and was supplemented with data from ClinicalTrials.gov and US/Japanese regulatory approval review information. Using the 30 or 50 % responder rate (RR), logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between the degree of placebo response and several potential influencing factors. Results The search identified 71 trials (n = 6,126). The estimated 50 % RRs (95 % confidence intervals) in the placebo group were as follows: peripheral neuropathic pain (P-NeP) 23 % (21, 26 %); central neuropathic pain (C-NeP) 14 % (10, 19 %); postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) 19 % (15, 24 %); painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) 26 % (23, 29 %); posttraumatic peripheral neuropathic pain (PT) 15 % (10, 20 %). From the logistic regression analyses, it was found that there was a significant association between placebo response (50 % RR and 30 % RR) and NeP classification (P Conclusion The results of this study suggest that NeP condition, trial design, and demographic and baseline characteristics may contribute to elevated placebo response in clinical trials in patients with NeP. In addition, the magnitude of placebo response and the effect of treatment duration are greater in pDPN than in PHN. These facts should be considered when planning and conducting confirmatory trials in NeP.
    Clinical Drug Investigation 01/2015; 35(2). DOI:10.1007/s40261-014-0259-1 · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current study investigates whether milnacipran, an equipotent serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is effective in reducing chronic radicular pain in patients (N = 11) with lumbosacral disc disease. This study is a 10-week randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of milnacipran (100-200 mg/d, dosed twice a day). Subjects (enrolled from October 2010 to September 2011 through the Duke University Pain and Palliative Care Clinic, Durham, North Carolina) included patients with radiologically confirmed disc disease with nerve root compression. The primary outcome measure was radicular pain measured by visual analog scale score (VAS-Rad); patients were asked to specifically rate radicular pain ("shooting or electrical or prickly pain in 1 or both legs"). Secondary outcome measures included nociceptive low back pain by visual analog scale (VAS-Noc), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Beck Depression Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Between-group changes in outcome measures between baseline and endpoint were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U nonparametric measure of central tendency. Milnacipran treatment yielded statistically significant reduction in radicular pain (VAS-Rad, P = .01) and nociceptive low back pain (VAS-Noc, P = .04) compared to placebo. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in the other secondary outcome measures. In this small pilot study, milnacipran treatment was associated with reduction in radicular and nociceptive low back pain in patients with lumbosacral disc disease. Larger studies of milnacipran in this population are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01777581.
  • Article: Neuropathy
    Canadian Journal of Diabetes 04/2013; 37:S142-S144. DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.039 · 0.46 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
476 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014