Is there a Language Divide in Pap Test Use?

UCLA Department of Health Services & UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, USA.
Medical Care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 12/2006; 44(11):998-1004. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233676.61237.ef
Source: PubMed


We sought to determine whether primary language use, measured by language of interview, is associated with disparities in cervical cancer screening.
We undertook a secondary data analysis of a pooled sample of the 2001 and 2003 California Health Interview Surveys. The surveys were conducted in English, Spanish, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean, and Vietnamese.
The study was a cross-sectional analysis of 3-year Pap test use among women ages 18 to 64, with no reported cervical cancer diagnosis or hysterectomy (n = 38,931). In addition to language of interview, other factors studied included race/ethnicity, marital status, income, educational attainment, years lived in the United States, insurance status, usual source of care, smoking status, area of residence, and self-rated health status.
We fit weighted multivariate logit models predicting 3-year Pap test use as a function of language of interview, adjusting for the effects of specified covariates.
Compared with the referent English interview group, women who interviewed in Spanish were 1.65 times more likely to receive a Pap test in the past 3 years. In contrast, we observed a significantly reduced risk of screening among women who interviewed in Vietnamese (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.93), Cantonese (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.66), Mandarin (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.72), and Korean (OR 0.62; 0.40-0.98).
Improved language access could reduce cancer screening disparities, especially in the Asian immigrant community.


Available from: Neetu Chawla
  • Source
    • "overall, the landline surname strata and very high-incidence strata were oversampled, while the low-and mediumincidence strata were undersampled. 1 again stratification is a common strategy , utilized in many other studies (see, for example, LeFauvre, Srinath, and arday 2006; ponce et al. 2006; kalton 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the largest and fastest-growing minority population in the United States, Hispanics have become an increasing focus of survey research. The vast body of Hispanic research evidences myriad options regarding sampling, data collection, and weighting, each of which can affect the resulting data about this population. Typical survey designs feature simple random samples (sometimes obtained as part of larger omnibus or general-population surveys), stratified RDD, “top market,” and surname designs. In addition, some studies obtain interviews in English only, while others offer both English and Spanish but make choices regarding the use and allocation of bilingual interviewers. Finally, there are a range of considerations in the weighting of Hispanic survey data. Utilizing data from a national omnibus survey, the General Social Survey, and the Pew Hispanic Center National Survey of Latinos, this article explores these three foci: sampling, interviewing language, and weighting. We report on what we find to be best practices and the implications of failing to enact these practices, as measured by bias and variance in survey estimates of Hispanics.
    Public Opinion Quarterly 06/2014; 78(2):392-415. DOI:10.1093/poq/nfu005 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although many of the common patient-focused barriers (e.g., health insurance, financial problems) documented in this multicenter study have been previously reported (Battaglia, Roloff, Posner, & Freund, 2007; Dohan & Schrag, 2005; Freeman, 2012; Hendren et al., 2011), it is worthy to note that several patient-focused barriers (e.g., fear, attitudes toward providers, perceptions about tests and treatments) and systemlevel barriers (e.g., communication with providers, literacy and language) did not significantly impact time to diagnostic resolution among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities participating in the PNRP (Armstrong, Ravenell, McMurphy, & Putt, 2007; Battaglia et al., 2007; Dohan & Schrag, 2005; Dovidio et al., 2008; Freeman, 2012; Hendren et al., 2011; Natale-Pereira, Enard, Nevarez, & Jones, 2011; Ponce et al., 2006). Additionally, the number of patient barriers varied by the different institutions and may be a reflection of the resources available at the locations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient navigation (PN) is a system-level strategy to decrease cancer mortality rates by reducing barriers to cancer care. Barriers to resolution among participants in the PN intervention arm with a breast or cervical abnormality in the Patient Navigation Research Program and navigators' actions to address those barriers were examined. Data from seven institutions (2005-2010) included 1,995 breast and 1,194 cervical patients. A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to examine the effects of barriers on time to resolution of an abnormal screening test or clinical finding. The range of unique barriers was 0 to 12 and 0 to 7 among participants with breast and cervical abnormalities, respectively. About two thirds of breast and one half of cervical participants had at least one barrier resulting in longer time to diagnostic resolution among breast (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.744; p < .001) and cervical (adjusted HR, 0.792; p < .001) participants. Patient- and system-level barriers were most common. Frequent navigator actions were making arrangements, scheduling appointments, referrals, and education. Having a barrier resulted in a delay in diagnostic resolution of an abnormal screening test or clinical finding. Health care systems can use these findings to improve existing PN programs or when developing new programs.
    Women s Health Issues 01/2014; 24(1):e155-e162. DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.010 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Previous studies have indicated that there are substantial barriers that prevent Vietnamese American women from obtaining Pap tests. In addition to the perceived invasive nature of the Pap test itself, Vietnamese women share with other members of their communities common, often insurmountable barriers, including cultural (modesty), linguistic (limited or no English proficiency), and socioeconomic (poverty) barriers and a pervasive unfamiliarity with the USA healthcare system [11–14]. Although each of these barriers has been found to be associated with screening rates in other populations, the impact of these barriers is more profound on this hard-to-reach ethnic group [9, 15, 16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Vietnamese American women are at the greatest risk for cervical cancer but have the lowest cervical cancer screening rates. This study was to determine whether demographic and acculturation, healthcare access, and knowledge and beliefs are associated with a prior history of cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese women. Methods: Vietnamese women (n = 1450) from 30 Vietnamese community-based organizations located in Pennsylvania and New Jersey participated in the study and completed baseline assessments. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Overall levels of knowledge about cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) are low. Factors in knowledge, attitude, and beliefs domains were significantly associated with Pap test behavior. In multivariate analyses, physician recommendation for screening and having health insurance were positively associated with prior screening. Conclusion: Understanding the factors that are associated with cervical cancer screening will inform the development of culturally appropriate intervention strategies that would potentially lead to increasing cervical cancer screening rates among Vietnamese women.
    Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 09/2012; 2012:617234. DOI:10.1155/2012/617234
Show more