Why invest in an educational fellowship program?

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Academic Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.47). 12/2006; 81(11):936-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000242476.57510.ce
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Expanding and refining the repertoire of medical school teaching faculty is required by the many current and changing demands of medical education. To meet this challenge academic medical institutions have begun to establish programs--including educational fellowship programs--to improve the teaching toolboxes of faculty and to empower them to assume leadership roles within both institutional and educational arenas. In this article, the authors (1) provide historical background on educational fellowship programs; (2) describe the prevalence and focus of these programs in North American medical schools, based on data from a recent (2005) survey; and (3) give a brief overview of the nine fellowship programs that are discussed fully in other articles in this issue of Academic Medicine. These articles describe very different types of educational fellowships that, nevertheless, share common features: a cohort of faculty members who are selected to participate in a longitudinal set of faculty development activities to improve participants' teaching skills and to build a cadre of educational leaders for the institution. Evaluation of educational fellowships remains a challenging issue, but the authors contend that one way to evaluate the programs' effectiveness is to look at the educational improvements that have been instigated by program graduates. The authors hope that the various program descriptions will help readers to improve their existing programs and/or to initiate new programs.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – This paper aims to explore the impact leadership development program graduates had on their workgroup, the nature of that impact and how that impact occurred. Design/methodology/approach – This research was conducted at three sites using a qualitative interview methodology with thematic data analysis. Techniques to ensure trustworthiness included purposive sampling, triangulation of researchers, member checks and code checking. Findings – Analysis of the data revealed secondhand learning as specific changes in practices, behaviors and attitudes, transferred by program graduates to their peers and supervisors. The transfer of learning was described as both intentional and informal learning during episodes of varying duration, and occurred through a variety of dyadic and group interactions in a manner generally consistent with the 4I framework of organizational learning. Research limitations/implications – The study was limited to medical educators. Recommendations for supervisors and organizations to maximize training transfer are identified. These suggestions advocate for actively encouraging graduates in departmental leadership and faculty development; focusing transfer on specific practices, behaviors and attitudes; and considering both short- and long-term outcomes. Originality/value – This paper makes an original contribution to the literature by describing the process of secondhand learning from leadership development program graduates. The paper also expands our understanding of the nuances in transfer methods and associated learning episodes in the context of an educational environment. Finally, the research illustrates how qualitative methods can be used to expose secondhand learning.
    Journal of Workplace Learning 10/2014; 26(8):511-528. DOI:10.1108/JWL-01-2014-0003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction/Background: In 2010, the '2010 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for CPR and ECC' was released. Based on the guideline, the new Family & Friends(R) CPR (F&F) course in English was released in 2011. In 2012, the Japanese version of the F&F course DVD was released. In Asia; there was no native language F&F course until the release of the 2010 Japanese version. There is little research about the effectiveness of F&F in Asian countries. The objectives of the present study were to survey changes of attitude by by Japanese medical students participating in Japanese F&F. Ultimately, this study will be a part of a research project about how F&F courses effect Asian people. Methods: The F&F course was presented to first and second year university students. In Japan, there is no requirement to get a BLS license before entering medical school and medical university enrollment begins just after high school graduation. Therefore, although F&F is a simple, easy course, this is somewhat difficult for them. The following are the specific features of F&F: 1) It is for the lay person who wants to learn how to do CPR. It is video-based, runs less than one hour and includes adult CPR and FBAO; 2) Learners practice CPR while watching the video; 3) People can facilitate this program without a certificate required. The students were from the faculties of nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy. A questionnaire using the five-point Likert scale was administered twice - once before and once after the course. The following six questions were asked in both the pre and post questionnaires: 1) interest in news about CPR, 2) confidence about CPR training by a simulator, 3) confidence about using AED [C2] with the simulator, 4) confidence about CPR for humans, 5) confidence about using AED for humans, and 6) interest in advanced courses such as Heartsaver or BLS[C3] Healthcare Provider courses. In addition, we asked about the recommendation of the course to their juniors, surveying satisfaction levels by the five-point Likert scale mentioned above. [C1] Will your readers know what this means? [C2] Will your readers know what AED is? [C3] Best,perhaps, tp define/spell out all Acronyms. There were 348 participants and 332 (95.4%) answered the questionnaire. The answers and changes for the six questions were following: (1) from [3.4, 1.0] (average, SD) to [4.3, 0.9], (2) from [3.4, 1.0] to [4.4, 0.9], (3) from [3.4, 1.1] to [4.2, 1.0], (4) from [2.5, 1.0] to [3.7, 0.9], (5) from [2.6, 1.0] to [3.6, 0.9], and (6) from [3.3, 1.1] to [3.5, 1.0]. There were significant differences in all questions (p < 0.05). The result for recommendation of the course was [4.2, 1.0]. These show that learners improved their self-confidence through CPR training. Moreover, they became interested in CPR news and wanted to recommend F&F to their juniors. Conclusion: The results show that participants had a high level of satisfaction concerning the course. From this viewpoint, level one of Kirkpatrick's four level evaluation model (reaction) seems to have been achieved. Most of participants were 18 years old. Therefore, the F&F course which is simple and easy but an AHA certificated course at the same time, was suitable for them. Required as an assignment in the future is to achieve level two (learning) and level three (behavior). For achievement of level two, we have to evaluate learners skills and knowledge. However, there are no certificate checklists for skills or knowledge tests for F&F. Therefore, we shall make these check tools based on AHA's guidelines and evaluate them at first. Reference: 1. American Heart Association: Family & Friends (R) CPR DVD With Facilitator Guide, American Heart Association, 2011, pp 1-18. Disclosures: None.
    Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 01/2013; 8(6):403. DOI:10.1097/01.SIH.0000441370.61737.26 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica 09/2014; 31(3):417-423.


Available from