Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects

Abteilung für Evolutionsgenetik, Institut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Köln 50674, Germany.
Genome Research (Impact Factor: 13.85). 12/2006; 16(11):1334-8. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5204306
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Comparative studies require knowledge of the evolutionary relationships between taxa. However, neither morphological nor paleontological data have been able to unequivocally resolve the major groups of holometabolous insects so far. Here, we utilize emerging genome projects to assemble and analyze a data set of 185 nuclear genes, resulting in a fully resolved phylogeny of the major insect model species. Contrary to the most widely accepted phylogenetic hypothesis, bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) are basal to the other major holometabolous orders, beetles (Coleoptera), moths (Lepidoptera), and flies (Diptera). We validate our results by meticulous examination of potential confounding factors. Phylogenomic approaches are thus able to resolve long-standing questions about the phylogeny of insects.

Download full-text


Available from: Martin J Lercher, Aug 30, 2015
  • Source
    • "optera ) . The results of this phylogenomics study suggested that bees and wasps occupy the basal position in the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects . Later , a maximum - likelihood tree generated from concatenated sequences of 1150 single - copy orthologues amongst 10 metazoan species ( Richards et al . , 2008 ) also confirmed the results of Savard et al . ( 2006 ) . A recent phylogenom - ics study ( Peters et al . , 2014 ) exploited de novo transcrip - tome data to study holometabolous insects ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phylogenomics, the integration of phylogenetics with genome data, has emerged as a powerful approach to study the evolution and systematics of species. Recently, several studies employing phylogenomic tools have provided better insights into insect evolution. Next-generation sequencing methods are now increasingly used by entomologists to generate genomic and transcript sequences of various insect species and strains. These data provide opportunities for comparative genomics and large-scale multigene phylogenies of diverse lineages of insects. Phy-logenomic investigations help us to better understand systematic and evolutionary relationships of insect species that play important roles as herbivores, predators, detritivores, pollinators and disease vectors. It is important that we critically assess the prospects and limitations of phylogenomic methods. In this review, I describe the current status, outline the major challenges and remark on potential future applications of phylogenomic tools in studying insect systematics and evolution. © 2015 The Royal Entomological Society.
    Insect Molecular Biology 05/2015; DOI:10.1111/imb.12174 · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Coleoptera all have putative CO 2 GRs (Fig. 1a), which is consistent with their comparatively close evolutionary relationship (Savard et al. 2006). A phylogenetic analysis showed that these CO 2 GRs form three groups (Fig. 1b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is important in insect ecology, eliciting a range of behaviours across different species. Interestingly, the numbers of CO2 gustatory receptors (GRs) vary among insect species. In the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, two GRs (DmelGR21a and DmelGR63a) have been shown to detect CO2. In the butterfly, moth, beetle and mosquito species studied so far, three CO2 GR genes have been identified, while in tsetse flies, four CO2 GR genes have been identified. In other species including honeybees, pea aphids, ants, locusts and wasps, no CO2 GR genes have been identified from the genome. These genomic differences may suggest different mechanisms for CO2 detection exist in different insects but, with the exception of Drosophila and mosquitoes, limited attention has been paid to the CO2 GRs in insects. Here, we cloned three putative CO2 GR genes from the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera and performed phylogenetic and expression analysis. All three H. armigera CO2 GRs (HarmGR1, HarmGR2 and HarmGR3) are specifically expressed in labial palps, the CO2-sensing tissue of this moth. HarmGR3 is significantly activated by NaHCO3 when expressed in insect Sf9 cells but HarmGR1 and HarmGR2 are not. This is the first report characterizing the function of lepidopteran CO2 receptors, which contributes to our general understanding of the molecular mechanisms of insect CO2 gustatory receptors.
    Naturwissenschaften 04/2015; 102(3-4):1260. DOI:10.1007/s00114-015-1260-0 · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, we conclude that each of the four independent transitions to holocentricity in insects was associated with CenH3 loss. Phylogenetic analyses of CenH3 and other H3 proteins based on their homologous histonefold domains reveal a topology of insect CenH3s that is largely consistent with the expected branching order of the insect species (Whiting, 2002; Grimaldi and Engel, 2005; Savard et al., 2006) (Figure 1— figure supplement 6), confirming that the absence of CenH3 in holocentric insects is due to recurrent loss rather than reinvention or horizontal transfer of CenH3 in monocentric insect lineages. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: eLife digest Cell division is a fundamentally important process for living organisms. In eukaryotes, such as plants and animals, genomic DNA is tightly packaged into chromosomes, which needs to be copied and faithfully divided into daughter cells. Segregating the chromosomes is accomplished by the kinetochore, a protein complex that assembles on the chromosome and forms attachments to the machinery that provides the force for chromosome segregation. Kinetochores assemble on specialized chromosomal regions called centromeres. In most eukaryotes, kinetochore assembly relies on a centromeric protein called CenH3 that is essential for the process of chromosome segregation. Most animal and plant species are monocentric—one part of the chromosome is dedicated to CenH3 loading and centromere function and paired chromosomes appear to be joined at a single point, or primary constriction. In contrast, holocentric species instead have centromeric activity distributed along the entire length of the paired chromosomes. How holocentricity arose from monocentricity over the course of evolution remains unclear. Drinnenberg et al. took advantage of the fact that insects represent at least four independent transitions from monocentric to holocentric chromosomes. Several species of insects are holocentric—including butterflies and moths, bugs and lice, earwigs, and dragonflies—while others are monocentric—such as flies, bees, and beetles. Drinnenberg et al. compared the repertoire of kinetochore proteins from each of these insect lineages and found that CenH3 was absent in all the holocentric insects examined but present in all the monocentric insect species. Despite the loss of CenH3 in the holocentric insects, they still had many of the kinetochore proteins—particularly, those proteins that attach to the machinery that forces chromosomes apart. Based on an evolutionary reconstruction, Drinnenberg et al. infer that each independent transition to holocentricity in insects likely introduced changes to the centromere that eliminated the need for the otherwise essential CenH3 protein. This study challenges the notion that CenH3 is essential in all eukaryotes. Indeed, holocentric insects, which make-up 16% of the biodiversity of the currently known eukaryote species, appear to have evolved a completely novel way to define their centromeres, distinct from all the other eukaryotes. DOI:
    eLife Sciences 09/2014; 3:03676. DOI:10.7554/eLife.03676 · 8.52 Impact Factor
Show more