The IgE-facilitated allergen binding (FAB) assay: validation of a novel flow-cytometric based method for the detection of inhibitory antibody responses.

Upper Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK.
Journal of Immunological Methods (Impact Factor: 2.01). 01/2007; 317(1-2):71-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The IgE-facilitated allergen binding (IgE-FAB) assay represents an in vitro model of facilitated allergen presentation. Allergen-IgE complexes are incubated with an EBV-transformed B cell line and complexes bound to CD23 on the surface of cells are detected by flow cytometry. The addition of serum from patients who have received allergen-specific immunotherapy has been shown previously to inhibit allergen-IgE complex binding to CD23 on B cells. In this study, we describe the characterisation and analytical validation of the grass pollen-specific IgE-FAB assay according to guidelines from the International Conference on Harmonisation. We established the intra- and inter-assay variability of IgE-FAB and have defined the detection limits of this assay. We have also demonstrated assay linearity and robustness. Using the results from a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of grass pollen immunotherapy (n=33), we have defined the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the IgE-FAB assay using ROC curve analysis. In conclusion, the IgE-FAB assay is reproducible, robust, sensitive and a specific method suitable as a tool for monitoring inhibitory antibody function from patients receiving allergen immunotherapy.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergic diseases are among the most common health issues worldwide. Specific immunotherapy has remained the only disease-modifying treatment, but it is not effective in all patients and may cause side effects. Over the last 25 years, allergen molecules from most prevalent allergen sources have been isolated and produced as recombinant proteins. Not only are these molecules useful in improved allergy diagnosis, but they also have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of allergic disease by means of immunotherapy. Panels of unmodified recombinant allergens have already been shown to effectively replace natural allergen extracts in therapy. Through genetic engineering, several molecules have been designed with modified immunological properties. Hypoallergens have been produced that have reduced IgE binding capacity but retained T cell reactivity and T cell peptides which stimulate allergen-specific T cells, and these have already been investigated in clinical trials. New vaccines have been recently created with both reduced IgE and T cell reactivity but retained ability to induce protective allergen-specific IgG antibodies. The latter approach works by fusing per se non-IgE reactive peptides derived from IgE binding sites of the allergens to a virus protein, which acts as a carrier and provides the T-cell help necessary for immune stimulation and protective antibody production. In this review, we will highlight the different novel approaches for immunotherapy and will report on prior and ongoing clinical studies.
    Current treatment options in allergy. 03/2014; 1:91-106.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have prepared this document, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2013 Update", according to the evidence-based criteria, revising and updating chapters of the originally published paper, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009", available at Namely, these comprise: "Mechanisms of sublingual immunotherapy;" "Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy" - reporting all the data of all controlled trials published after 2009; "Safety of sublingual immunotherapy" - with the recently published Grading System for adverse reactions; "Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on the natural history of respiratory allergy" - with the relevant evidences published since 2009; "Efficacy of SLIT in children" - with detailed analysis of all the studies; "Definition of SLIT patient selection" - reporting the criteria for eligibility to sublingual immunotherapy; "The future of immunotherapy in the community care setting"; "Methodology of clinical trials according to the current scientific and regulatory standards"; and "Guideline development: from evidence-based medicine to patients' views" - including the evolution of the methods to make clinical recommendations.Additionally, we have added new chapters to cover a few emerging crucial topics: "Practical aspects of schedules and dosages and counseling for adherence" - which is crucial in clinical practice for all treatments; "Perspectives and new approaches" - including recombinant allergens, adjuvants, modified allergens, and the concept of validity of the single products. Furthermore, "Raising public awareness about sublingual immunotherapy", as a need for our patients, and strategies to increase awareness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) among patients, the medical community, all healthcare stakeholders, and public opinion, are also reported in detail.
    World Allergy Organization Journal 03/2014; 7(1):6.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background IgE-mediated allergic rhinitis to grass pollen can successfully be treated with either allergen immunotherapy tablets (SLIT-tablet) or SQ-standardised subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). The efficacy of these two treatment modalities for grass allergy is comparable, but the immunological mechanisms may differ. ID: NCT01889875. Objectives To compare the immunological changes induced by SQ-standardized SCIT and SLIT-tablet. Methods We randomized 40 individuals with grass pollen rhinitis into groups receiving SCIT, SLIT-tablet, or neither and followed them for 15 months with regular serum measurements of specific IgE, IgG4, IgE-blocking-factor, facilitated antigen presentation (FAP), and basophil activation (BAT). Nasal challenges were used to assess changes in nasal sensitivity. ResultsAfter 15 months of treatment IgG4, IgE-blocking Factor, FAP and BAT values differed significantly in both SCIT and SLIT-tablet treatment groups when compared to the control group. Both SCIT and SLIT-tablet groups were significantly different from the control group after 1-3 months of treatment. In general, the changes induced by SCIT reached twice that of SLIT-tablet, with the exception of specific IgE where SLIT-tablet induced initial threefold increase compared to SCIT. A slight, but significant increase in IgE and BAT after season was seen only in the control group. Significant differences between SCIT and SLIT-tablet were observed early but the differences diminished with the length of treatment, especially for FAP inhibition. Conclusions Both SCIT and SLIT-tablet induce significant changes in specific antibodies (IgE and IgG4) and competition assays (IgE-blocking factor, FAP and BAT). Overall, SCIT induced larger (two-threefold) changes than SLIT-tablet, with the exception of FAP, where SLIT-tablet showed a gradual increase ending at the same level as SCIT. Maximal change was generally reached after three months’ treatment.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Clinical & Experimental Allergy 11/2013; 44(3). · 4.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014