Gynecologic oncology patients' satisfaction and symptom severity during palliative chemotherapy

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (Impact Factor: 2.12). 10/2006; 4(1):84. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-84
Source: PubMed


Research on quality and satisfaction with care during palliative chemotherapy in oncology patients has been limited. The objective was to assess the association between patient's satisfaction with care and symptom severity and to evaluate test-retest of a satisfaction survey in this study population.
A prospective cohort of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy were enrolled after a diagnosis of recurrent cancer. Patients completed the Quality of End-of-Life care and satisfaction with treatment scale (QUEST) once upon enrollment in an outpatient setting and again a week later. Patients also completed the Mini-Mental Status Exam, the Hospital Anxiety/Depression Scale, a symptom severity scale and a demographic survey. Student's t-test, correlation statistics and percent agreement were used for analysis.
Data from 39 patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) quality of care summary score was 41.95 (2.75) for physicians and 42.23 (5.42) for nurses (maximum score was 45; p = 0.76 for difference in score between providers). Mean (SD) satisfaction of care summary score was 29.03 (1.92) for physicians and 29.28 (1.70) for nurses (maximum score was 30; p = 0.49 for difference between providers). Test-retest for 33 patients who completed both QUEST surveys had high percent agreement (74-100%), with the exception of the question regarding the provider arriving late (45 and 53%). There was no correlation between quality and satisfaction of care and symptom severity. Weakness was the most common symptom reported. Symptom severity correlated with depression (r = 0.577 p < 0.01). There was a trend towards a larger proportion of patients reporting pain who had three or more prior chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.075). Prior number of chemotherapy regimens or time since diagnosis was not correlated with symptom severity score. Anxiety and depression were correlated with each other (r = 0.711, p < 0.01). There was no difference in symptom severity score at enrollment between those patients who have since died (n = 19) versus those who are still alive.
The QUEST Survey has test-retest reliability when used as a written instrument in an outpatient setting. However, there was no correlation between this measure and symptom severity. Patient evaluation of care may be more closely related to the interpersonal aspects of the health care provider relationship than it is to physical symptoms.

Full-text preview

Available from: PubMed Central
  • Source
    • "perception of the healthcare received (Coulter, 2006; Charalambous and Adamakidou, 2012). Furthermore, preceding studies have studied patient satisfaction in specific cancers including but not limited to gastroesophageal (Kavadas et al., 2004), breast (Bergenmar et al., 2006; Defossez et al., 2007), colorectal (Mathiesen et al., 2007) and gynaecological (Vashisht et al., 2000; von Gruenigen et al., 2006). However, very few studies have dealt with a large sample size and a population that is heterogeneous with respect to cancer types. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess and compare the perceived patient satisfaction with the nursing care in two European countries. This was a multicenter cross-national descriptive study. The study included various centers both specialized and general that provide cancer care. The data were collected from hospitalized cancer patients in Greece and Cyprus with the Greek version of the Risser Patient Satisfaction Scale. The scale assessed patients' satisfaction on three distinct dimensions namely "Technical-professional", "Interpersonal-educational" and "Interpersonal-trusting". The analyses revealed that there are significant differences in the total scale (p < 0.05) and the interpersonal-trusting subscale (p < 0.001) between the two countries. In order to gain an in-depth understanding of these findings, the qualitative analysis revealed that the following main themes contributed to the way the patients experienced their hospitalisation: 'safety', 'fear', 'lack of information' and 'continuity of the care'. The patients attributed increased importance to the interpersonal-trusting aspects' influence on their satisfaction. Based on the qualitative data, this was attributed to two main themes namely 'individuality' and 'humane care'. The European environment offers an ideal setting to examine satisfaction variations among patients. Although the findings demonstrated a positively skewed attitude by the patients towards the care provided by the nurses in both countries, these findings also revealed significant differences. The patients' experiences were explored in light of variations in culture, health systems and the actual differences in quality as perceived by patients. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Health Planning and Management 10/2014; 29(4). DOI:10.1002/hpm.2225 · 0.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, patient satisfaction surveys can help to identify patient groups who merit additional attention or even targeted interventions, and can also highlight areas of the care process where there is room for improvement. Several studies have focused on patient satisfaction in specific cancer treatments, such as gastro-esophageal [1], breast [2,3], colorectal [4], and gynaecological cancers [5]. However, few included a large sample size and a heterogeneous population as regards cancer types [6-8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the oncology setting, there has been increasing interest in evaluating treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life and patient satisfaction. The aim of our study was to investigate the determinants of patient satisfaction, especially the relationship between quality of life and satisfaction with care and their changes over time, in curative treatment of cancer outpatients. Patients undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy in two centers in France were invited to complete the OUT-PATSAT35, at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and three months after treatment. This questionnaire evaluates patients' perception of doctors and nurses, as well as other aspects of care organization and services. Additionally, for each patient, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and self-reported quality of life data (EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected. Of the 691 patients initially included, 561 answered the assessment at all three time points. By cross-sectional analysis, at the end of the treatment, patients who experienced a deterioration of their global health reported less satisfaction on most scales (p <= 0.001). Three months after treatment, the same patients had lower satisfaction scores only in the evaluation of doctors (p <= 0.002). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis showed a significant relationship between a deterioration in global health and a decrease in satisfaction with their doctor and, conversely, between an improvement in global health and an increase in satisfaction on the overall satisfaction scale. Global health at baseline was largely and significantly associated with all satisfaction scores measured at the following assessment time points (p < 0.0001). Younger age (<55 years), radiotherapy (versus chemotherapy) and head and neck cancer (versus other localizations) were clinical factors significantly associated with less satisfaction on most scales evaluating doctors. Pre-treatment self-evaluated global health was found to be the major determinant of patient satisfaction with care. The subsequent deterioration of global health, during and after treatment, emphasized the decrease in satisfaction scores, mainly in the evaluation of doctors. Early initiatives aimed at improving the delivery of care in patients with poor health status should lead to improved perception of the quality of care received.
    BMC Cancer 01/2014; 14(1):42. DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-14-42 · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There are several studies in the literature that have evaluated service quality in cancers like gastroesophageal [13], breast [10, 14], colorectal [15], lung [16], prostate [16] and gynecological [17, 18]. Collectively, these studies have found that satisfaction with the information provided by medical staff about a patient's illness and the course of treatment is important. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: /st>To evaluate the relationship between self-reported satisfaction with service quality and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). /st>A prospective cohort study. /st>Cancer Treatment Centers of America(®) from July 2007 and December 2010. /st>Nine hundred and eighty-six returning NSCLC patients. /st>Overall patient experience 'considering everything, how satisfied are you with your overall experience' was measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 'completely dissatisfied' to 'completely satisfied.'. /st>Patient survival was the primary end point. /st>The response rate for this study was 69%. Six hundred patients were newly diagnosed, while 386 were previously treated. Four hundred sixty-nine were males, while 517 were females. 101, 59, 288 and 538 patients had stage I, II, III and IV disease, respectively. Mean age was 58.9 years. Six hundred and thirty (63.9%) patients had expired at the time of this analysis. Seven hundred and sixty-two (77.3%) patients were 'completely satisfied'. Median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.9-13.2 months). On univariate analysis, 'completely satisfied' patients had a significantly lower risk of mortality compared with those not 'completely satisfied' [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.84; P < 0.001]. On multivariate analysis controlling for stage at diagnosis, prior treatment history, age and gender, 'completely satisfied' patients demonstrated significantly lower mortality (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.85; P < 0.001) compared with those not 'completely satisfied'. /st>Self-reported experience with service quality was an independent predictor of survival in NSCLC patients undergoing oncologic treatment, a novel finding in the literature. Based on these provocative findings, further exploration of this relationship is warranted in well-designed prospective studies.
    International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10/2013; 25(6). DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzt070 · 1.76 Impact Factor
Show more