Improved outcomes of extremely premature outborn infants: Effects of strategic changes in perinatal and retrieval services

Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 12/2006; 118(5):2076-83. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1540
Source: PubMed


The goal was to evaluate the impact of statewide coordinated changes in perinatal support and retrieval services on the outcomes of extremely premature births occurring outside perinatal centers in the state of New South Wales, Australia.
The intervention included additional, network-coordinated, perinatal telephone advice to optimize in utero transfers and centralization of the neonatal retrieval system, with preferential admission of retrieved infants (outborn infants) to perinatal centers instead of freestanding pediatric hospitals, from the middle of 1995. Population birth and NICU admission cohorts of infants of 23 to 28 weeks of gestation were studied. Outcomes of epoch 1 (1992 to the middle of 1995; 1778 births and 1100 NICU admissions) were compared with those of epoch 2 (1997-2002; 3099 births and 2100 NICU admissions), after an 18-month washout period.
There were 25% fewer nontertiary hospital live births (19.7% vs 14.9%) and more prenatal steroid use. Despite an 11.4% average annual increase in NICU admissions between the 2 epochs, fewer infants were outborn (12.0% vs 9.3%) and outborn mortality rates decreased significantly (39.4% vs 25.1%), particularly for those between 27 and 28 weeks of gestation. The overall improvement was equivalent to 1 extra survivor per 16 New South Wales births. There were also significantly fewer serious outcome morbidities in outborn infants during epoch 2, over the improvements in inborn infants.
Statewide coordinated strategies in reducing nontertiary hospital births and optimizing transport of outborn infants to perinatal centers have improved considerably the outcomes of extremely premature infants. These findings have vital implications for health outcomes and resource planning.

Download full-text


Available from: Mohamed E Abdel-Latif,
  • Source
    • "2. Neonatal Intensive Care Units' follow-up data collection, an ongoing statewide audit at 2–3 years of age, corrected for prematurity, of infants born less than 29 weeks' gestation. A full description of the NICUS and follow-up data and the NSW and ACT neonatal service organization and networking is available elsewhere [6] [7]. 2.2. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rural and remote residents in Australia have long experienced unfavourable health outcomes compared to their urban counterparts. To study neurodevelopmental outcome at 2-3years of age, corrected for prematurity of extremely preterm infants admitted to a regional neonatal Australian network from rural and urban regions (based on usual location of maternal residence). A multicenter population-based cohort study in which surviving urban and rural infants <29weeks of gestation born between 1998 and 2004 underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at 2-3years of age, corrected for prematurity by a developmental assessment team. Moderate/severe functional disability was defined as developmental delay (GQ or MDI>2 SD below the mean), cerebral palsy (aided for walking), sensorineural or conductive deafness (requiring amplification), and bilateral blindness (visual acuity <6/60 in the better eye). Of the 1970 infants alive at 2-3years of age, 268 (63.8%) rural and 1205 (77.7%) urban infants were evaluated. Infants lost to follow-up were of slightly higher gestational age and birth weight. Both rural and urban assessed groups were comparable in gestation and birth weight percentile. In comparison to their urban counterparts, the rural group had more outborn infants (19.8% vs. 4.6%, p<0.001). They, however, did not have an increased risk of moderate/severe functional disability (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.23, p=0.176). This finding was not significantly altered by limiting the analysis to different gestational ages. Extremely premature surviving young children from rural areas of residence do not seem to have an increased risk for moderate/severe functional disability. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Early Human Development 05/2015; 91(8):437-44. DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.014 · 1.79 Impact Factor

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Regionalized perinatal care is an on-going effort to systematically organize and coordinate health care for expectant mothers and newborns. In the 1960s and 1970s, academic clinicians and public health experts pioneered regionalized perinatal services in response to new neonatal care technologies and expanding but still limited expertise (Committee on Perinatal Health, 1976; Graven, Howe, & Callon, 1976). By design, regionalization prioritizes the distribution of clinical care and technologies to women and infants according to risk. The spectrum of regionalized services ideally spans from preconception planning to infant health, although the concept is more commonly associated with the inpatient obstetric and neonatal services that women and infants receive in the hours and days surrounding birth. This chapter provides an evidence-based evaluation of regionalized perinatal care, its role and potential to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal outcomes, and illustrates the need for a broader implementation if its goals are to be fully realized.
Show more