Improved outcomes of extremely premature outborn infants: effects of strategic changes in perinatal and retrieval services.

Department of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker St, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 4.47). 12/2006; 118(5):2076-83. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1540
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal was to evaluate the impact of statewide coordinated changes in perinatal support and retrieval services on the outcomes of extremely premature births occurring outside perinatal centers in the state of New South Wales, Australia.
The intervention included additional, network-coordinated, perinatal telephone advice to optimize in utero transfers and centralization of the neonatal retrieval system, with preferential admission of retrieved infants (outborn infants) to perinatal centers instead of freestanding pediatric hospitals, from the middle of 1995. Population birth and NICU admission cohorts of infants of 23 to 28 weeks of gestation were studied. Outcomes of epoch 1 (1992 to the middle of 1995; 1778 births and 1100 NICU admissions) were compared with those of epoch 2 (1997-2002; 3099 births and 2100 NICU admissions), after an 18-month washout period.
There were 25% fewer nontertiary hospital live births (19.7% vs 14.9%) and more prenatal steroid use. Despite an 11.4% average annual increase in NICU admissions between the 2 epochs, fewer infants were outborn (12.0% vs 9.3%) and outborn mortality rates decreased significantly (39.4% vs 25.1%), particularly for those between 27 and 28 weeks of gestation. The overall improvement was equivalent to 1 extra survivor per 16 New South Wales births. There were also significantly fewer serious outcome morbidities in outborn infants during epoch 2, over the improvements in inborn infants.
Statewide coordinated strategies in reducing nontertiary hospital births and optimizing transport of outborn infants to perinatal centers have improved considerably the outcomes of extremely premature infants. These findings have vital implications for health outcomes and resource planning.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infants born outside perinatal centers may have compromised outcomes due to the transfer speed and efficiency to an appropriate tertiary center. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of regional coordinated changes in perinatal supports and retrieval services on the outcome of transported neonates in Beijing, China.
    World journal of pediatrics : WJP. 08/2014; 10(3):251-5.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many factors in the delivery and perinatal care of infants with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) have an impact on outcome and costs. This study sought to determine the modifiable factors in perinatal management that have an impact on postnatal resource use for infants with CHD. The medical records of infants with prenatally diagnosed CHD (August 2006–December 2011) who underwent cardiac surgery before discharge were reviewed. The exclusion criteria ruled out prematurity and intervention or transplantation evaluation before surgery. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and cost data were collected. Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the impact of perinatal decisions on hospitalization cost and surrogates of resource use after adjustment for demographic and other risk factors. For the 126 patients who met the study criteria, the median hospital stay was 22 days (range 4–122 days), and the median inflation-adjusted total hospital cost was $107,357 (range $9,746–602,320). The initial admission to the neonatal versus the cardiac intensive care unit (NICU vs. CICU) was independently associated with a 19 % longer hospital stay, a 26 % longer ICU stay, and 47 % more mechanical ventilation days after adjustment for Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 score, gestation age, genetic abnormality, birth weight, mode of delivery, and postsurgical complications. Weekend versus weekday delivery was not associated with hospital cost or length of hospital stay. For term infants with prenatally diagnosed CHD undergoing surgery before discharge, preoperative admission to the NICU (vs. the CICU) resulted in a longer hospital stay and greater intensive care use. Prenatal planning for infants with CHD should consider the initial place of admission as a modifiable factor for potential lowering of resource use.
    Pediatric Cardiology 06/2014; · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To evaluate the rate and circumstances of outborn deliveries within a French perinatal network, and to determine their avoidability. Study design Cohort study including preterm infants <33 weeks gestation and/or weighing <1500 g born outside a level III maternity unit in Lower Normandy region, France, in 2008–2010. In 2008 and 2009, only neonates transferred to the Caen University Teaching Hospital (CHU) were included. In 2010, all outborn neonates in the region were included by means of a medical information system program. A panel of 7 experts was set up to determine the avoidability of each outborn case using a two-stage modified Delphi procedure. Inter-expert agreement was evaluated using the kappa index. Results Sixty-four cases (71 neonates) were included. The outborn rate in 2010 was 16.1% (40/248, 95% CI (116–207%)). The most common reason for delivery was spontaneous onset of labour (57.8%). In 12 cases, the place of birth (level 2b maternity unit) was considered to be appropriate by the experts (term ≥32 WG), but 8 cases involved infants of low birth weight (<1500 g). For the 52 cases born in inappropriate sites, 9.6% were considered to be avoidable (kappa index = 0.42 (p < 10–3)). Conclusion Our outborn rate meets regionalisation targets. Our method of expert evaluation identified a small percentage of avoidable births in inappropriate sites. Regular reassessment of obstetric practices and good coordination between network actors are crucial to improve the management of pregnancies at risk of outborn delivery.
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 08/2014; · 1.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014