Efficacy and Safety of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.48). 12/2006; 118(5):1142-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.050
Source: PubMed


Allergic rhinitis (AR), an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, affects approximately 25% of adults and 40% of children in the United States. Ciclesonide nasal spray is a corticosteroid being developed as a hypotonic formulation for AR.
We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ciclesonide nasal spray in adult and adolescent patients with seasonal AR (SAR).
In this double-blind study patients (age, >or=12 years) were randomized to receive 200 microg of intranasal ciclesonide (n = 164) or placebo (n = 163) once daily for 28 days. The primary measure was morning and evening patient-assessed reflective total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Additionally, instantaneous TNSSs, physician-assessed overall nasal signs and symptoms severity, and the results of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.
Ciclesonide significantly improved average morning and evening reflective and instantaneous TNSSs compared with placebo over days 1 to 14 (P < .001). Improvements were also noted over days 1 to 28 (P < .001) and over days 15 to 28 (P = .011). Ciclesonide was well tolerated.
Intranasal ciclesonide was superior to placebo in relieving nasal symptoms in adult and adolescent patients with SAR. These results confirm the dose range-finding study in patients with SAR and support the efficacy of ciclesonide in AR.
In a clinical setting ciclesonide was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of SAR in adolescent and adult patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Patrick Darken, Jul 25, 2014
1 Follower
54 Reads
  • Source
    • "In contrast, there is limited study on the efficacy of ciclesonide NS on ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis. A study by Ratner et al.28 did not find any significant reduction in ocular symptoms when comparing ciclesonide NS with placebo. Although there may still be some contradictory evidence, INS remains a powerful pharmacologic tool for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis denotes both nasal and ocular manifestation of allergy, which may be solely treated with intranasal steroid. This study compares the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray (NS) and fluticasone furoate NS in treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The secondary objective is to study the severity of baseline ocular symptoms in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Seventy-eight patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were assessed subjectively and objectively using twice-daily symptom scores for nasal (reflective total nasal symptom score [rTNSS] and instantaneous TNSS [iTNSS]) and ocular (reflective total ocular symptom score [rTOSS] and instantaneous TOSS [iTOSS]) symptoms, rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaires (RQOLQs), and acoustic rhinometry. All measurements were taken at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Sixty-three patients who were randomized into the mometasone furoate group (n = 36) and the fluticasone furoate group (n = 27) completed the study. Seventy-six percent of patients had mild ocular symptoms, 20.5% had moderate symptoms, and only 2.6% had severe symptoms at baseline based on the iTOSS; 65.1% had mild nasal symptoms and 3% had severe nasal symptoms. There was significant reduction in the symptom scores after 1 week (p < 0.05). Both groups had significant improvement in RQOLQ scores after 1 month, which further improved at 2 months (p < 0.05). The nasal dimensions also improved in both groups (p < 0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Both mometasone furoate and fluticasone furoate are effective as single-modality treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The majority of patients manifest mild ocular symptoms that may be solely treated with intranasal steroids.
    03/2013; 4(3):e120-6. DOI:10.2500/ar.2013.4.0065
  • Source
    • "This slow-release pool of active drug may contribute to the proven effi cacy of once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in asthma therapy, as was shown in several clinical studies (Postma et al 2001; Chapman et al 2004; Langdon et al 2005). The same holds true for once-daily intranasal ciclesonide in rhinitis therapy (Nave et al 2006b; Ratner et al 2006; Kim et al 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ciclesonide is a novel corticosteroid (CS) for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis. After administration, the parent compound ciclesonide is converted by intracellular airway esterases to its pharmacologically active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). We investigated the in vitro activation of ciclesonide and further esterification of des-CIC to (mainly) des-CIC oleate in several human target organ test systems. Human precision-cut lung slices, alveolar type II epithelial cells (A549), normal bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE), and nasal epithelial cells (HNEC) were incubated with ciclesonide. Enzymes characterization and the determination of the reversibility of fatty acid esterification was investigated in HNEC and NHBE. Ciclesonide was taken up and converted to des-CIC in all cellular test systems. Intracellular concentrations of des-CIC were maintained for up to 24 h. Formation of des-CIC oleate increased over time in HNEC, A549 cells, and lung slices. The formed des-CIC fatty acid conjugates were reconverted to des-CIC. Increasing concentrations of carboxylesterase and cholinesterase inhibitors progressively reduced the formation of metabolites. The results derived from these studies demonstrate the activation of ciclesonide to des-CIC in the upper and lower airways. The reversible formation of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates may prolong the anti-inflammatory activity of des-CIC and may allow for once-daily dosing.
    Journal of Asthma and Allergy 09/2008; 1(1):11-8. DOI:10.2147/JAA.S4051
  • Source
Show more