A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects

Orthodontic Graduate Program and Cranio-facial and Oral-health Evidence-based Group, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
The European Journal of Orthodontics (Impact Factor: 1.48). 01/2007; 28(6):586-93. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl034
Source: PubMed


The objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate, through lateral cephalograms, facial soft tissue changes after the use of the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects. Several electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Database, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Lilacs) were searched with the assistance of a senior health sciences librarian. Abstracts, which appeared to fulfil the initial criteria, were selected by consensus. The original articles were then retrieved. Their references were also hand searched for possible missing articles. Clinical trials, which assessed facial soft tissue changes with the use of either an Activator or a Bionator appliance without any surgical intervention or syndromic characteristics, were considered. A comparable untreated control group was required to factor out normal growth changes. Five articles using the Activator and six using the Bionator fulfilled the selection criteria and quantified facial soft tissue changes. An individual analysis of these articles was undertaken and some methodological flaws were identified. Based on the available evidence, a significant amount of controversy regarding the soft tissue changes produced by the Activator and the Bionator exists. Soft tissue changes that were reported as being statistically significant were of questionable clinical significance. Long-term, double-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the findings. Three-dimensional quantification is also required to overcome current limitations in our understanding of the soft tissue changes obtained with the use of removable functional appliances.


Available from: Paul Major, Aug 19, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Equalization and multi-user detection are well-studied signal processing techniques in the literature. For the fixed (stationary) channel the efficacy of minimal resource allocation network (MRAN) is studied in detail, in this paper the applicability of MRAN is extended to time varying case of single user transmission as well as fixed and tune varying scenarios of multi-user direct sequence code division multiple access (DS-CDMA) case. The paper presents simulation results together with fine-tuning/observations necessary in the implementation of the algorithm for the said cases.
    Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2003 and the Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia. Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Conference of the Fourth International Conference on; 01/2004

  • American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 07/2006; 129(6):716-7; author reply 717. DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.003 · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The literature is becoming replete with systematic reviews of orthodontic-related topics. However, their findings have not been appraised and summarised collectively. Systematic reviews related to orthodontics published between 1 January 2000, and 31 January 2007 were identified and reviewed. Fifty-one orthodontic systematic reviews were identified in the defined period. A highly significant percentage of reviews (29%) failed to reach conclusions. Conclusions were made in the remaining reviews although many relied on secondary levels of evidence to do so. In this narrative review the findings from these studies are summarised. Systematic reviews in orthodontic-related areas have produced some interesting findings. However an unacceptably high number continue to be inconclusive, reflecting methodological inadequacies of the review process and exposing inadequacies in our evidence base.
    International Dental Journal 03/2008; 58(1):10-4. DOI:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2008.tb00171.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
Show more