Article

Short-, intermediate-, and long-term quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--does the learning curve of LRP have a negative impact on patients' quality of life?

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
European Urology (Impact Factor: 10.48). 05/2007; 51(4):1004-12; discussion 1012-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.065
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and investigate whether the learning curve of laparoscopic novices has a negative influence on patients' QoL.
Evaluation of QoL with the EORTC QLQ C-30 and the PR25 preoperatively (t0) as well as postoperatively after 1-3 mo (t1), 4-6 mo (t2), 7-12 mo (t3), 13-24 mo (t4), and yearly thereafter (t5-t7). Surgeons were grouped according to their prior experience in laparoscopy into experienced and novices.
LRP was performed in 343 patients; 268 (78%) participated in the study. The mean patient age was 63.3+/-6.3 yr; mean PSA, 10.0+/-9.2 ng/ml; mean follow-up, 26 mo. Global health was impaired for t1 (p<0.001) and then returned to baseline. Emotional functioning improved (p<0.001) for t2-t7 versus baseline. Physical functioning remained impaired for t1-t2, and role and social functioning for t1-t6. Only sexual functioning did not return to baseline for t1-t7. Urinary symptoms were worse at t1 and then improved gradually (p<0.001). No significant difference in any QoL domain could be identified for experienced surgeons versus novices except for financial difficulties at t2-t3, which related to social differences. Thirty-one (9%) patients with adjuvant therapy had significantly worse global health, bowel symptoms, urinary symptoms, fatigue, and sexual functioning.
The learning curve of laparoscopic novices does not have a negative impact on patients' QoL. For intermediate- to long-term follow-up, patients reach their baseline or score even better in all domains except for sexual functioning but are significantly impaired if adjuvant treatment is performed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
49 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Detailed knowledge of quality of life (QoL) after permanent I-125 brachytherapy may aid in counselling patients with early-stage prostate cancer. Seventy-four consecutive patients with low-risk prostate cancer were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire with the prostate-specific PR25 module before implant, four weeks and one year after implant (response rates 97%, 88% and 89%, respectively). Implant characteristics were correlated with QoL scores. Global QoL was stable from pre-treatment to one year after implant and similar to age-adjusted scores of healthy controls. Significant changes versus baseline in QLQ-C30 domains were worsened social function at four weeks, increased constipation at four weeks and at one year and improved emotional function at one year. PR25 urinary symptoms were significantly increased at four weeks and, despite some improvement, at one year; bowel symptoms were slightly increased. Both types of symptoms were most strongly related with pre-treatment symptom scores. Prostate-V150 was the only implant parameter significantly associated with both urinary and bowel symptoms at four weeks and one year. Limiting the high-dose subvolume in the prostate may be beneficial to reduce urinary and bowel symptoms but the major determinant of symptoms after I-125 implant is the baseline symptom level.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 02/2009; 91(2):217-24. · 4.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: To assess the process of obtaining proficiency in laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) by examining outcomes from our first 101 LSP cases. Methods: 101 consecutive patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent LSP between January 2003 and January 2008. Prostate volume, IPSS, uroflowmetry, post void residual, mean operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of catheter use, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were analyzed in this patient subset by dividing patients into one of two groups: Group 1, cases 1–50; Group 2, cases 51–101. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, prostate volume, uroflow, IPSS score or post void residual. There was a significant decrease in operative time between the two groups (107 􏰋 28.6 minutes vs 84 􏰋 33.1 minutes; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed regarding mean blood loss (325 mL vs. 400 mL; p 1⁄4 0.275). Although minor complications were more numerous in the last 51 cases, major complications tended to decrease with time (p 1⁄4 0.014). The duration of bladder catheter tends to decrease after the 50th case (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy is safe with comparable outcomes to those published for open prostatectomy series. The operative time can be effectively reduced with practice and we estimate the learning curve for this procedure to be 50 cases.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the systemic response to extraperitoneal laparoscopic (eLRP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In all, 430 patients who had eLRP (200) or open RRP (230) were re- cruited; patients in both groups had similar preoperative staging. In addition to peri-oper- ative variables (operative duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitaliza- tion, catheterization), oncological data (Gleason score, pathological stage, positive mar- gins) were also compared. The extent of the systemic response to surgery-induced tissue trauma was measured in all patients, by assessing the levels of acute-phase markers C-re- active protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 before, during and after RP. RESULTS. The duration of surgery, transfusion rate, hospital stay and duration of catheteri- zation were comparable with those of previous studies. There was an increase in IL-6, CRP and SAA but no change in IL-10, and no differences between eLRP and RRP over the en- tire period assessed. CONCLUSION. The invasiveness of eLRP could not be substantiated objectively on the basis of the variables measured in this study. The surgical trauma and the associated invasive- ness of both methods were equivalent. (Urologia 2008; 75: 156-63)

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from