The relationship between peritraumatic distress and peritraumatic dissociation: an examination of two competing models.

McGill University, Douglas Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease (Impact Factor: 1.81). 12/2006; 194(11):853-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000244563.22864.f1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined whether peritraumatic dissociation serves to protect trauma-exposed individuals from experiencing high levels of peritraumatic distress or is an epiphenomenon of high levels of peritraumatic distress. The sample was comprised of 709 police officers and 317 peer-nominated civilians exposed to a variety of critical incidents. Participants filled out measures of trauma exposure, traumatic stress, peritraumatic distress, and peritraumatic dissociation. There was an overall moderate-to-strong linear relationship between peritraumatic distress and dissociation. Among those with high levels of dissociation, very few reported low levels of distress. Among those with high levels of distress, a significant number--but not all--reported high levels of dissociation. Our results do not provide support for the idea that dissociation protects individuals from experiencing high levels of distress at the time of the trauma but rather suggest that dissociation is an epiphenomenon of high levels of distress observed in a subset of individuals.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: The authors examined the incidence and predictors of peritraumatic distress and dissociation after one of the most common forms of civilian trauma exposure: motor vehicle collision (MVC). Methods: In this study, patients presenting to the emergency department after MVC who were without serious injury and discharged to home after evaluation (n = 935) completed an emergency department interview evaluating sociodemographic, collision-related, and psychological characteristics. Results: The incidence and predictors of distress (Peritraumatic Distress Inventory score ≥ 23) and dissociation (Michigan Critical Events Perception Scale score >3) were assessed. Distress was present in 355 of 935 patients (38%) and dissociation was present in 260 of 942 patients (28%). These outcomes showed only moderate correlation (r = 0.45), and had both shared and distinct predictors. Female gender, anxiety symptoms prior to MVC, and vehicle damage severity predicted both distress and dissociation. Higher socioeconomic status (higher education, higher income, full time employment) had a protective effect against distress but not dissociative symptoms. Better physical health and worse overall mental health were associated with increased risk of dissociation, but not distress. Distress but not dissociation was associated with lower patient confidence in recovery and a longer expected duration of recovery. Conclusion: There are unique predictors of peritraumatic distress and dissociation. Further work is needed to better understand the neurobiology of peritraumatic distress and dissociation, and the influence of these peritraumatic outcomes on persistent psychological sequelae.
    Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 07/2014; 15(5). DOI:10.1080/15299732.2014.908805 · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the European multi-centre study BeSeCu (Behaviour, Security, Culture), interviews were conducted in seven countries to explore survivors' emotional, behavioural, and cognitive responses during disasters. Interviews, either in groups or one-to-one, were convened according to type of event: collapse of a building; earthquake; fire; flood; and terror attack. The content analysis of interviews resulted in a theoretical framework, describing the course of the events, behavioural responses, and the emotional and cognitive processing of survivors. While the environmental cues and the ability to recognise what was happening varied in different disasters, survivors' responses tended to be more universal across events, and most often were adaptive and non-selfish. Several peri-traumatic factors related to current levels of post-traumatic stress were identified, while memory quantity did not differ as a function of event type or post-traumatic stress. Time since the event had a minor effect on recall. Based on the findings, several suggestions for emergency training are made.
    Disasters 01/2014; 38(1):62-83. DOI:10.1111/disa.12034 · 0.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study investigated the predictive power of trait dissociation on the development of intrusive images and the mediating role of peritraumatic state dissociation and horror in this relationship. An observational quasi-experimental design was used with an aversive film to model a traumatic experience. Participants (N = 99) were exposed to a 10-minute trauma film after completing the Dissociative Experiences Scale C. After the film participants completed the Dissociative States Subscale and indicated their subjective horror. Intrusive images of the film were recorded in the subsequent week using an intrusion diary Results showed that trait dissociation predicted intrusion frequency This effect disappeared after controlling for peritraumatic horror, suggesting that state horror could have mediated the trait dissociation intrusion relationship. State dissociation was associated with intrusion frequency in univariate, partial correlations but not in the final model including horror. The results underscore the importance of peritrauma emotions in the prediction of PTSD and as a possible explaining factor of the predictive power of dissociation.
    International Journal of Cognitive Therapy 06/2011; DOI:10.1521/ijct.2011.4.2.145 · 0.98 Impact Factor