Effectiveness and benefit-cost of peer-based workplace substance abuse prevention coupled with random testing.

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11710 Beltsville Drive, Suite 125 Calverton, MD 20705, USA. <>
Accident Analysis & Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.87). 06/2007; 39(3):565-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Few studies have evaluated the impact of workplace substance abuse prevention programs on occupational injury, despite this being a justification for these programs. This paper estimates the effectiveness and benefit-cost ratio of a peer-based substance abuse prevention program at a U.S. transportation company, implemented in phases from 1988 to 1990. The program focuses on changing workplace attitudes toward on-the-job substance use in addition to training workers to recognize and intervene with coworkers who have a problem. The program was strengthened by federally mandated random drug and alcohol testing (implemented, respectively, in 1990 and 1994). With time-series analysis, we analyzed the association of monthly injury rates and costs with phased program implementation, controlling for industry injury trend. The combination of the peer-based program and testing was associated with an approximate one-third reduction in injury rate, avoiding an estimated $48 million in employer costs in 1999. That year, the peer-based program cost the company $35 and testing cost another $35 per employee. The program avoided an estimated $1850 in employer injury costs per employee in 1999, corresponding to a benefit-cost ratio of 26:1. The findings suggest that peer-based programs buttressed by random testing can be cost-effective in the workplace.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Corporate data fall under the general category of administrative data and provide varied information on the worker and workplace. Studies of worker health, including evaluations of workplace programs, are often based on corporate data. With the exception of health care claims data, which are usually administered by a third party, the corporation collects these data and grants permission to use them. In light of new federal regulations, gaining access to corporate data is more complicated and intimidating than ever before. This paper discusses the impact of federal regulations on the use of corporate data in research, the potential of corporate data in evaluation studies, the challenges to obtaining and using these data, and finally, study designs that make use of corporate data.
    American Journal of Evaluation 25(1):109-119. DOI:10.1016/j.ameval.2003.11.003 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health 02/2014; 29(1):73-90. DOI:10.1080/15555240.2014.866478
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Prisoners experience significantly worse health than the general population. This review examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer interventions in prison settings. Methods A mixed methods systematic review of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies, including qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted. In addition to grey literature identified and searches of websites, nineteen electronic databases were searched from 1985 to 2012. Study selection criteria were: Population: Prisoners resident in adult prisons and children resident in Young Offender Institutions (YOIs). Intervention: Peer-based interventions. Comparators: Review questions 3 and 4 compared peer and professionally led approaches. Outcomes: Prisoner health or determinants of health; organisational/process outcomes; views of prison populations. Study designs: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed method evaluations. Results Fifty-seven studies were included in the effectiveness review and one study in the cost-effectiveness review; most were of poor methodological quality. Evidence suggested that peer education interventions are effective at reducing risky behaviours, and that peer support services are acceptable within the prison environment and have a positive effect on recipients, practically or emotionally. Consistent evidence from many, predominantly qualitative, studies, suggested that being a peer deliverer was associated with positive effects. There was little evidence on cost-effectiveness of peer-based interventions. Conclusions There is consistent evidence from a large number of studies that being a peer worker is associated with positive health; peer support services are also an acceptable source of help within the prison environment and can have a positive effect on recipients. Research into cost-effectiveness is sparse. Systematic review registration PROSPERO ref: CRD42012002349.
    BMC Public Health 03/2015; 15. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1584-x · 2.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014