Practical and conceptual challenges in measuring antiretroviral adherence.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467, USA.
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (Impact Factor: 4.39). 01/2007; 43 Suppl 1:S79-87. DOI: 10.1097/01.qai.0000248337.97814.66
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Accurate measurement of antiretroviral adherence is essential for targeting and rigorously evaluating interventions to improve adherence and prevent viral resistance. Across diseases, medication adherence is an individual, complex, and dynamic human behavior that presents unique measurement challenges. Measurement of medication adherence is further complicated by the diversity of available measures, which have different utility in clinical and research settings. Limited understanding of how to optimize existing adherence measures has hindered progress in adherence research in HIV and other diseases. Although self-report is the most widely used adherence measure and the most promising for use in clinical care and resource-limited settings, adherence researchers have yet to develop evidence-based standards for self-reported adherence. In addition, the use of objective measures, such as electronic drug monitoring or pill counts, is limited by poor understanding of the source and magnitude of error biasing these measures. To address these limitations, research is needed to evaluate methods of combining information from different measures. The goals of this review are to describe the state of the science of adherence measurement, to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of common adherence measurement methods, and to recommend directions for improving antiretroviral adherence measurement in research and clinical care.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High levels of adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) are central to HIV management. The objective of this study was to compare multiple measures of adherence and investigate factors associated with adherence among HIV-infected children in western Kenya. We evaluated ART adherence prospectively for six months among HIV-infected children aged ≤14 years attending a large outpatient HIV clinic in Kenya. Adherence was reported using caregiver report, plasma drug concentrations and Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS®). Kappa statistics were used to compare adherence estimates with MEMS®. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between child, caregiver and household characteristics with dichotomized adherence (MEMS® adherence ≥90% vs. <90%) and MEMS® treatment interruptions of ≥48 hours. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Among 191 children, mean age at baseline was 8.2 years and 55% were female. Median adherence by MEMS® was 96.3% and improved over the course of follow-up (p<0.01), although 49.5% of children had at least one MEMS® treatment interruption of ≥48 hours. Adherence estimates were highest by caregiver report, and there was poor agreement between MEMS® and other adherence measures (Kappa statistics 0.04-0.37). In multivariable logistic regression, only caregiver-reported missed doses in the past 30 days (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.39), late doses in the past seven days (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.22) and caregiver-reported problems with getting the child to take ART (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) were significantly associated with dichotomized MEMS® adherence. The caregivers reporting that ART made the child sick (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25) and reporting difficulties in the community that made giving ART more difficult (e.g. stigma) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27) were significantly associated with MEMS® treatment interruptions in multivariable logistic regression. Non-adherence in the form of missed and late doses, treatment interruptions of more than 48 hours and sub-therapeutic drug levels were common in this cohort. Adherence varied significantly by adherence measure, suggesting that additional validation of adherence measures is needed. Few factors were consistently associated with non-adherence or treatment interruptions.
    Journal of the International AIDS Society 11/2014; 17(1):19227. DOI:10.7448/IAS.17.1.19227 · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current tools for measuring medication adherence have significant limitations, especially among pediatric populations. We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drug levels in hair for evaluating antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among HIV-infected children in rural Uganda. Three-day caregiver recall, 30-day visual analog scale (VAS), Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), and unannounced pill counts and liquid formulation weights (UPC) were collected monthly over a one-year period. Hair samples were collected quarterly and analyzed for nevirapine (NVP) levels, and plasma HIV RNA levels were collected every six months. Among children with at least one hair sample collected, we used univariable random intercept linear regression models to compare log transformed NVP concentrations with each adherence measure, and the child's age, sex, and CD4 count percentage (CD4%). One hundred and twenty-one children aged 2-10 years were enrolled in the study; 74 (61%) provided at least one hair sample, and the mean number of hair samples collected per child was 1.9 (standard deviation [SD] 1.0). Three-day caregiver recall, VAS, and MEMS were found to be positively associated with increasing NVP concentration in hair, although associations were not statistically significant. UPC was found to have a nonsignificant negative association with increasing hair NVP concentration. In conclusion, NVP drug concentrations in hair were found to have nonsignificant, although generally positive, associations with other adherence measures in a cohort of HIV-infected children in Uganda. Hair collection in this population proved challenging, suggesting the need for community education and buy-in with the introduction of novel methodologies.
    AIDS Care 12/2014; 27(3):1-6. DOI:10.1080/09540121.2014.983452 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The efficacy of pre-exposure-prophylaxis (PrEP) in HIV can diminish with poor adherence; pharmacologic measures of drug exposure have proven critical to PrEP trial interpretation. We assessed drug exposure in hair against other pharmacologic and more routinely-used measures to assess pill-taking.
    JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 10/2014; 68(1). DOI:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000386 · 4.39 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Aug 10, 2014