Article

Biocompatibility of furcal perforation repair material using cell culture technique: Ketac Molar versus ProRoot MTA.

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. <>
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology (Impact Factor: 1.5). 01/2007; 102(6):e48-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of furcal perforation repair materials, GI and MTA, using cell culture technique.
The extract of ProRoot MTA and Ketac Molar were treated on PDL cells in a 96-well tissue-culture plate. Cell proliferation after an incubation period of 3 days was determined by using MTT assay.
The growth of cultured human periodontal fibroblast cells were suppressed by both perforation repair materials. The percent of cell viability in the Ketac Molar group was lower than in the ProRoot MTA group (P = .000).
Although Ketac Molar has the advantage of adhering to dentine, it is more cytotoxic to the PDL cells than MTA. In selecting the perforation repair material, it is recommended not only to consider the sealing ability of the material with dentine but also the biocompatibility of material to the underlying tissue.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
137 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study sought to compare the elemental constitution, morphological characteristics, particle size distribution, biocompatibility, and mineralization potential of Ortho MTA (OMTA) and ProRoot MTA (PMTA). Materials and Methods: OMTA and PMTA were compared using energy-dispersive spectrometry, particle size analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The biocompatibility and mineralization-related gene expression (osteonectin and osteopontin) of both MTAs were also compared using methylthiazol tetrazolium assay and reverse transcription-polymerization chain reaction analysis, respectively. The results were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction. P-value of
    Journal of Korean Dental Science. 01/2013; 6(2).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biocompatibility is a desirable feature for root-end filling materials. In this study we aimed to compare a new material called cold ceramic (CC) with intermediate restorative material (IRM) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) using Methyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The materials were tested in fresh and set states: (n=108). The cytotoxicity was compared using L929 fibroblasts as an indicator; tested materials were eluted with culture medium according to ISO: 109935 standard. Distilled water and culture medium served as positive and negative controls, respectively (n=36). The results were evaluated at 1, 24 hours and 7 days. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA for each time interval and material status and t-tests. The cytotoxicity of the tested materials were statistically different at the various time intervals (P<0.001). IRM was the most cytotoxic root-end filling material (P<0.001), MTA demonstrated the least cytotoxicity followed by CC. Despite displaying the greatest cytotoxicity, IRM is approved by the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Cold ceramic had significantly lower cytotoxicity compared to IRM, in all but one subgroup. Further investigations are required to assess the clinical applicability of this novel material.
    Iranian endodontic journal. 01/2009; 4(3):106-11.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was carried out in order to determine in vitro biocompatibility of white mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and to compare it with that of the commonly used materials, i. e. calcium hydroxide liner (Dycal), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and Portland cement which has a similar composition of MTA. To assess the biocompatibility of each material, cytotoxicity was examined using MG-63 cells. The degree of cytotoxicity was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a colorimetric method, based on reduction of the tetrazolium salt 2,3 bis {2methoxy 4nitro 5[(sulfenylamino) carbonyl] 2H tetrazolium hydroxide} (XTT) assay. The results of SEM revealed the cells in contact with GIC, MTA. and Portland cement at 1 and 3 days were apparently healthy. In contrast, cells in the presence of Dycal appeared rounded and detached. In XTT assay, the cellular activities of the cells incubated with all the test materials except Dycal were similar, which corresponded with the SEM observation. The present study supports the view that MTA is a very biocompatible root perforation repair material. It also suggests that cellular response of Portland cement and GIC are very similar to that of MTA.
    Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. 01/2009; 34(3).