Article

Neurobehavioral Performance of Adult and Adolescent Agricultural Workers

Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology (CROET), L606, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
NeuroToxicology (Impact Factor: 3.05). 04/2007; 28(2):374-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.10.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There are many occupational hazards associated with working in agriculture including risk of injury and exposure to pesticides. Research examining neurobehavioral effects of pesticide exposure have focused primarily on the acute effects in adults working in agriculture. Organophosphate poisoned populations have shown a consistent pattern of deficits when compared to a non-exposed or non-poisoned population on measures of motor speed and coordination, sustained attention, and information processing speed. Fewer studies have examined the effect of long-term low-level exposure on nervous system functioning in agricultural workers. Pesticides are thought to pose a considerably higher risk to children than to adults, yet little is known about the extent or magnitude of health problems related to occupational exposure to pesticides in children and adolescents. The present study compared the neurobehavioral performance of adolescents and adults working in agriculture and examined the impact of years working in agriculture on neurobehavioral performance. One hundred seventy-five Hispanic adolescent and adults completed a neurobehavioral test battery consisting of 10 computer-based tests measuring attention, response speed, coordination and memory. Age, gender, school experience, and years working in agriculture all impacted performance on the neurobehavioral tests. Comparison of adult and adolescents did not reveal decreased neurobehavioral performance in adolescents. On several tests the adolescents performed better than adult counterparts. The adolescents and adults were engaged in comparable agricultural working environments at the time of the neurobehavioral testing. These findings suggest that, at the time of exposure to pesticides, adolescents are not more vulnerable to the effects of working in agriculture. Evidence from this study suggests that cumulative exposure to low levels of pesticides over many years of agricultural work is associated with neurological impairment as measured by the Selective Attention, Symbol-Digit, Reaction Time tests. Experience handling pesticides was also associated with deficits in neurobehavioral performance.

Full-text

Available from: Diane Rohlman, May 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
152 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Occupational exposure to pesticides has not been conducted in depth so far in China. The potential dermal exposure and risk assessment were conducted for applicators through application with a knapsack power sprayer in cucumber greenhouses. The spray suspension was prepared with 75% chlorothalonil WP and 48% chlorpyrifos EC. The dermal patch method was applied to assess the potential dermal exposure (PDE) of applicators during application. The average total PDE on the whole body of applicators during application of chlorothalonil and chlorpyrifos was 83.2 mL h−1 and 85.1 mL h−1, respectively. The most exposed part of the body was arms, especially the right arm. For risk assessment, the margin of safety (MOS) was calculated from the PDE. The MOS values were 0.1 and 0.2 for application of chlorothalonil and chlorpyrifos, respectively, both less than 1, which indicated low possibility of health risk.
    Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10/2014; 21(4):972-985. DOI:10.1080/10807039.2014.949165 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is limited evidence about whether background exposure to organochlorine pesticides is related to impairment of cognitive function in general populations. This study was performed to investigate cross-sectional associations between serum concentrations of organochlorine pesticides and cognitive function, a predictor of dementia, among U.S. elders without overt dementia. Study subjects were 644 elders aged 60–85, participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. We selected 6 organochlorine pesticides (p,p′-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), p,p′-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), trans-nonachlor, oxychlordane, heptachlor epoxide, and β-hexachlorocyclohexane) which were commonly detected in current general population. Cognitive function was assessed with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test. All 6 compounds showed statistically significant or marginally significant inverse associations with cognitive score after adjusting for covariates including education levels. The strongest association was observed with p,p′-DDT. With the outcome of low cognitive score defined as < 25th percentile, elders in the highest quartile of p,p′-DDT, p,p′-DDE, and β-hexachlorocyclohexane had 2 to 3 times higher risks than those in the lowest quartile. In particular, when their concentrations were further divided with the cutoff points of 90th and 95th percentiles, p,p′-DDT in the highest 5th percentile showed 6.5 (95% confidence interval: 2.6–16.3) times higher risk of low cognitive score. On the other hand, non-persistent pesticides like organophosphates or pyrethroid showed little association with this cognitive score. The potential role of background exposure to organochlorine pesticides in the development of dementia should be explored in future prospective studies and in-vitro/in-vivo experimental studies.
    Environment International 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.003 · 5.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differences among outcomes required separate analyses on adults and adolescents.•Scores in tests on memory and attention were consistently lower in exposed adults.•Poisonings, subject characteristics or within-study bias did not explain the differences among studies.•Neuropsychological performances of exposed workers were related to exposure duration.•Further investigations are needed to specify the risk of adolescents and women.
    Environmental Research 01/2015; 136. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.030 · 3.95 Impact Factor