A Retrospective Comparison of Anesthetic Agents in Electroconvulsive Therapy

Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, United States
Journal of Ect (Impact Factor: 1.39). 01/2007; 22(4):243-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.yct.0000244238.17791.a4
Source: PubMed


A recent lack of availability of the anesthetic agent methohexital in the United States allowed for a naturalistic study of the efficacy and the adverse effects of alternatives. Methohexital, propofol, and thiopental were compared as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy in 95 patients treated during a 23-month period in a general public hospital. Missed seizures and arrhythmias were infrequently observed (<4% for any agent). Methohexital was found significantly related to longer seizure durations in comparison with both other agents (P < 0.01). The use of propofol was associated with increased risk of missed seizure (8.9%) compared with methohexital (3.9%) and thiopental (3.2%). Propofol was also associated with higher doses of administered energy, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.018) observed between propofol and thiopental. Although propofol required the greatest energy delivery, it was associated with the shortest seizure durations. Methohexital resulted in the longest seizure duration, and thiopental was associated with the least amount of energy delivery with an intermediate seizure length.

5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Methohexitone has been the most widely used anaesthetic for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, recent scarcity and erratic availability has led to use of other anaesthetics with differing effects upon ECT. We compared treatment parameters and response to ECT in patients anaesthetised with different anaesthetics in a routine clinical setting. This was a naturalistic retrospective casenote analysis of 81 consecutive courses of ECT (total 659 treatments) for major depression. Three anaesthetics were compared: methohexitone (n=34), propofol (n=13) and etomidate (n=34). Mean seizure duration was lowest (p<0.0001) for propofol. However, mean stimulus charge was highest in the propofol group (p<0.0001) who required a greater increase in stimulus charge during the course of treatment and also experienced a greater proportion of failed seizures (</=15 s on EEG). Despite differing effects upon treatment parameters, choice of anaesthetic did not appear to significantly affect therapeutic response to ECT. Use of propofol may be associated with longer treatment course that could result in extra cost. This was a retrospective casenote study, in which patients were not randomised to anaesthetic and standardised outcome measures were not used. The small sample size in the propofol group may have reduced the power of the study to demonstrate other differences between propofol and the other anaesthetic groups. A formal economic analysis was not performed. Individual anaesthetics differentially influence seizure duration and stimulus charge but final response to ECT appears not to be adversely affected.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 05/2008; 113(1-2):165-71. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.004 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mechanisms are involved in glutamate-mediated learning and memory as well as in glutamatergic excitotoxicity. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)-induced amnesia may arise from glutamatergic excitotoxicity; if so, COX-2 inhibition may attenuate retrograde amnesia with ECT. Wistar rats which received celecoxib (15 mg/kg per day) or vehicle for 18 days were trained for 3 days on a passive avoidance task. On each of the next 3 days, rats which showed perfect learning (n=51) received true or sham suprathreshold electroconvulsive shocks (ECS; 60 mC) in a factorial design; daily dosing with drug or vehicle was continued. One day after the last ECS, recall of pre-ECS learning was tested. ECS-treated rats showed impaired recall in the vehicle but not celecoxib group. Celecoxib significantly protected against ECS-induced retrograde amnesia; this benefit was independent of the drug-induced attenuation of ECS seizure duration. Celecoxib may protect against ECS-induced retrograde amnesia by attenuating ECS-induced, COX-2-mediated glutamatergic excitotoxicity.
    Journal of Neural Transmission 07/2008; 115(7):1063-70. DOI:10.1007/s00702-008-0063-2 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The optimal anesthetic for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a frequently studied but unresolved issue. Methohexital and propofol are 2 widely used anesthetic agents for ECT. The purpose of this study was to determine which of the 2 agents was associated with superior clinical outcomes. Records from all patients who had undergone separate ECT courses with methohexital and propofol between 1992 and 2008 (n = 48) were reviewed for a retrospective within-subject comparison of outcome measures. The clinical outcomes we examined were number of treatments required in a course of ECT, changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Mini Mental Status Examination, and length of stay in the hospital after initiation of ECT. Additionally, we compared treatment delivery between methohexital and propofol treatment courses, measuring rate of restimulation for brief seizures, seizure duration, percentage of treatments that were bilateral, and average charge administered. Data from 1314 treatments over 155 ECT courses were reviewed. Improvement in depressive symptoms, based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, was not affected by choice of anesthetic agent. However, when right unilateral electrode placement was used, patients receiving propofol required significantly more treatments than those receiving methohexital. Propofol was also associated with a significantly higher requirement for bilateral ECT and higher stimulus dosing. Seizure duration was significantly shorter in the propofol condition, with more patients requiring restimulation for brief seizures. Length of stay in the hospital and cognitive outcomes were not significantly different between propofol and methohexital treatments. We recommend methohexital as the induction agent of choice for ECT, especially with right unilateral placement.
    The journal of ECT 03/2012; 28(1):14-9. DOI:10.1097/YCT.0b013e31823a4220 · 1.39 Impact Factor
Show more