Cyanide in the chemical arsenal of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata.
ABSTRACT Cyanide production has been reported from over 2500 plant species, including some members of the Brassicaceae. We report that the important invasive plant, Alliaria petiolata, produces levels of cyanide in its tissues that can reach 100 ppm fresh weight (FW), a level considered toxic to many vertebrates. In a comparative study, levels of cyanide in leaves of young first-year plants were 25 times higher than in leaves of young Arabidopsis thaliana plants and over 150 times higher than in leaves of young Brassica kaber, B. rapa, and B. napus. In first-year plants, cyanide levels were highest in young leaves of seedlings and declined with leaf age on individual plants. Leaves of young plants infested with green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) produced just over half as much cyanide as leaves of healthy plants, suggesting that aphid feeding led to loss of cyanide from intact tissues before analysis, or that aphid feeding inhibited cyanide precursor production. In a developmental study, levels of cyanide in the youngest and oldest leaf of young garlic mustard plants were four times lower than in the youngest and oldest leaf of young Sorghum sudanense (cv. Cadan 97) plants, but cyanide levels did not decline in these leaves with plant age as in S. sudanense. Different populations of garlic mustard varied moderately in the constitutive and inducible expression of cyanide in leaves, but no populations studied were acyanogenic. Although cyanide production could result from breakdown products of glucosinolates, no cyanide was detected in vitro from decomposition of sinigrin, the major glucosinolate of garlic mustard. These studies indicate that cyanide produced from an as yet unidentified cyanogenic compound is a part of the battery of chemical defenses expressed by garlic mustard.
- SourceAvailable from: Regina Vaicekonyte[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Garlic mustard is an invasive, exotic herb that is now widespread in North America. Recent research has shown that garlic mustard exudes biochemical compounds that inhibit the growth of entomopathogenic fungi. We investigated how the removal of garlic mustard would affect the abundance of entomopathogenic fungi in forest soils in eastern New York. Using a standard bioassay, we compared the abundance of entomopathogenic fungi in soil with and without garlic mustard both before and 45 d after garlic mustard had been experimentally removed. In soil from which garlic mustard had been experimentally removed 45 d earlier, the abundance of entomopathogenic fungi was restored to levels found in soil with no history of garlic mustard. These results suggest it is possible to increase the abundance of entomopathogenic fungi in the soil in a short time by eradicating garlic mustard plants from an invaded area. Recolonization by entomopathogenic fungi could be beneficial to humans if it increases the mortality of arthropods that are vectors of infectious disease, such as blacklegged ticks, but harmful if it increases the mortality of arthropods that provide valuable ecosystem services, such as bees and ants.Invasive Plant Science and Management 04/2012; 5(3):323-329. · 0.84 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Invasive species can show substantial genetic variation in ecologically important traits, across ranges as well within the introduced range. If these traits affect competition with native species, then management may benefit from considering the genetic landscape of the invader. Across their introduced range, Alliaria petiolata populations vary in their investment in allelopathic traits according to invasion history, which could lead to gradients of impact on native species. Red oak (Quercus rubra) seedlings were transplanted into eight A. petiolata‐invaded sites that varied in their invasion history and allelochemical concentrations. At each site, an invader removal treatment was crossed with experimental inoculations of native soil biota, to test whether the benefits of these restoration actions differed across invader populations. Q. rubra seedlings grew faster in invader populations with a longer invasion history and lower allelochemical concentrations. Invader removal and soil inoculation interacted to determine seedling growth, with the benefits of soil inoculation increasing in younger and more highly allelopathic invader populations. A greenhouse experiment using soils collected from experimentally inoculated field plots found similar patterns. These results suggest that the impact of this invader varies across landscapes and that knowledge of this variation could improve the efficacy and efficiency of restoration activities.Evolutionary Applications 04/2012; 5(3). · 4.15 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Space and time are the two fundamental drivers of ecological dynamics. Studies exploring the Stress gradient hypothesis (SGH) – which predicts that the patterns of interspecific interactions shift from negative to positive with increasing environmental severity – conceptualize environmental severity predominantly from a spatial perspective. Here, from a temporal perspective and for intraspecific interactions, we asked: do the predictions of the SGH at the intraspecific level apply to seasonal change in environmental severity? We conducted a field experiment, which was complemented by a two-year field survey of natural populations of the non-native biennial forb Alliaria petiolata at the Koffler Scientific Reserve, Ontario, Canada. In both experiment and field survey studies we found statistically significant negative density-dependent survival in the productive summer period and positive density-dependent survival over the severe winter period. Effects were stronger in the field experiment than in the survey of natural populations. We suggest that the SGH at the intraspecific level may be applicable to seasonal variation in environmental severity, though our ability to detect its effect in natural communities may depend on other factors such as species dominance and environmental heterogeneity.Oikos 05/2014; · 3.56 Impact Factor
Cyanide in the Chemical Arsenal of Garlic Mustard,
Don Cipollini & Bill Gruner
Received: 3 July 2006 /Revised: 30 August 2006 /Accepted: 18 September 2006 /
Published online: 5 December 2006
# Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006
Abstract Cyanide production has been reported from over 2500 plant species, including
some members of the Brassicaceae. We report that the important invasive plant, Alliaria
petiolata, produces levels of cyanide in its tissues that can reach 100 ppm fresh weight
(FW), a level considered toxic to many vertebrates. In a comparative study, levels of
cyanide in leaves of young first-year plants were 25 times higher than in leaves of young
Arabidopsis thaliana plants and over 150 times higher than in leaves of young Brassica
kaber, B. rapa, and B. napus. In first-year plants, cyanide levels were highest in young
leaves of seedlings and declined with leaf age on individual plants. Leaves of young plants
infested with green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) produced just over half as much cyanide
as leaves of healthy plants, suggesting that aphid feeding led to loss of cyanide from intact
tissues before analysis, or that aphid feeding inhibited cyanide precursor production. In a
developmental study, levels of cyanide in the youngest and oldest leaf of young garlic
mustard plants were four times lower than in the youngest and oldest leaf of young
Sorghum sudanense (cv. Cadan 97) plants, but cyanide levels did not decline in these leaves
with plant age as in S. sudanense. Different populations of garlic mustard varied moderately
in the constitutive and inducible expression of cyanide in leaves, but no populations studied
were acyanogenic. Although cyanide production could result from breakdown products of
glucosinolates, no cyanide was detected in vitro from decomposition of sinigrin, the major
glucosinolate of garlic mustard. These studies indicate that cyanide produced from an as yet
unidentified cyanogenic compound is a part of the battery of chemical defenses expressed
by garlic mustard.
Keywords Allelopathy.Alliaria petiolata.Cyanide.Invasiveplants.Plantdefenses.
Cyanide is a well-known inhibitor of respiratory electron transport that is produced by over
2500 plant species including many food plants (Jones 1998). Although substantial debate
J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94
D. Cipollini (*):B. Gruner
Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton,
Ohio 45435, USA
exists on the role of cyanogenic compounds and cyanide in plants (Jones 1998; Gleadow
and Woodrow, 2002), cyanide production has been invoked as an herbivore- and pathogen-
resistance mechanism in many plants including clover, black cherry, and sorghum (Lindroth
et al., 2000; Busk and Møller, 2002; Fitzgerald et al., 2002; Gleadow and Woodrow, 2002).
In addition, cyanogenic compounds in plants like cassava appear to have roles in storage
and mobilization of nitrogen (Gleadow and Woodrow, 2002; Jorgensen et al., 2005).
Cyanide production in each of the aforementioned species typically reaches levels that can
impact animal or human health (Jones 1998). Cyanide production has been reported in
some members of the Brassicaceae, including Brassica oleraceae, B. juncea, B. rapa, B.
napus, and Raphanus sativus (Sexton and Howlett, 2000; Chandra et al., 2004), but levels
found thus far in plants in this family have been minimal and generally well below those
considered to affect plant or animal health. In turn, the source of the detectable cyanide in
brassicaceous plants is unknown, although the decomposition of glucosinolates, a
ubiquitous group of defensive secondary compounds in this family, is one candidate
(Sexton and Howlett, 2000).
Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata [(M. Bieb) Cavara and Grande; Brassicaceae] is a
Eurasian biennial herb that is an important invasive plant in North America. This plant has
several known or presumed impacts on the flora and fauna in its invaded range that are
apparently chemically mediated. These include allelopathic interactions with plants (Prati
and Bossdorf, 2004), mycorrhizal fungi (Roberts and Anderson, 2001; Stinson et al., 2006),
and herbivorous insects (Porter 1994; Haribal and Renwick, 1998; Haribal et al., 2001).
Garlic mustard is also grazed little by mammalian or avian herbivores (D. Cipollini,
personal observation). Like all brassicaceous plants, garlic mustard produces glucosinolates
and defense proteins in both a constitutive and inducible fashion (Vaughan and Berhow,
1999; Cipollini et al., 2005). Garlic mustard is also rich in flavone gycosides, including
isovitexin 6″-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, and it produces a novel cyanoallyl glycoside,
alliarinoside; both have demonstrable effects on insect resistance (Haribal and Renwick,
1998; Haribal et al., 2001; Cipollini et al., 2005). It is likely that this suite of defenses
contributes to the invasive success of this plant in novel habitats.
In this paper, we report that garlic mustard produces substantial quantities of cyanide
from its tissues, an as yet undescribed component of the chemical arsenal of this plant. We
first examined cyanide production in leaves and roots of young plants from a single
population of garlic mustard, and then compared levels found in shoots to those of several
in the youngest and oldest leaves of garlic mustard to that of a known cyanide producer,
Sorghum sudanense (Sudan grass). Third, we examined leaf age-specific cyanide
production in garlic mustard in the presence and absence of aphid herbivory. Fourth, we
examined variation among garlic mustard populations in constitutive and inducible cyanide
production. Finally, we examined whether the decomposition of sinigrin, the primary
glucosinolate in garlic mustard (Vaughan and Berhow, 1999), could be the source of
cyanide produced by this plant.
Methods and Materials
Experiment 1: Demonstration of Cyanide in Roots and Shoots of Garlic Mustard Seeds of
garlic mustard were collected from plants growing naturally in the Wright State University
forest preserve, cold stratified, and grown in the greenhouse in Pro Mix BX potting
86 J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94
medium, as described by Cipollini et al. (2005). Most experiments were conducted with the
Wright State population, although experiment 5 includes several other populations. In this
experiment, four plants were grown for 3 wk at which time all stems, leaves, and petioles
present on each plant were collected and pooled for cyanide analysis, as described below.
Roots of each plant were carefully extracted from the soil at the same time and rinsed free
of soil with distilled water before cyanide analysis. Cyanide production by above-ground
tissues was compared to that of roots with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on SAS
(version 9.1). Means were compared using Tukey’s test in this and all other experiments.
Experiment 2: Comparisons of Cyanide Production in Leaves of Garlic Mustard with Other
Brassicaceous Plants Seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia), Brassica
kaber (wild collected), B. rapa (wild collected), and B. napus (cv. Westar), were grown
from seed as described above, but without cold stratification. Garlic mustard was grown
from cold-stratified seed as described above. All leaf material present on five 3-wk-old
plants of each species was collected and pooled for analysis of cyanide. Cyanide production
was compared among species with one-way ANOVA.
Experiment 3: Temporal Variation in Cyanide Production in Leaves of Garlic Mustard in
Comparison to Sudan Grass This experiment was designed to compare variation in
cyanide production in garlic mustard to a known cyanide-producing plant. Garlic mustard
and Sudan grass [S. sudanense (cv. Cadan 97)] were grown from seed individually in pots
in Pro Mix BX, as described above. Starting 2 wk after germination, the youngest fully
expanded leaf and the oldest fully expanded leaf were collected from five plants of each
species for cyanide analysis. Harvests continued in this manner from a subset of previously
unsampled plants once per week for the next 8 wk, although the oldest leaves on each plant
could be sampled for only 4 wk until they were too senescent to sample. This collection
scheme isolates the effect of plant age on cyanide production in leaves of two distinct
developmental stages. Cyanide production through time was compared between garlic
mustard and Sudan grass with repeated-measures ANOVA, with time as the within-subject
effect and species as the between-subjects effect. As the youngest leaves on each plant were
sampled for 8 wk, and the oldest for only 4 wk, cyanide production was statistically
examined separately for the youngest and oldest leaves.
Experiment 4: Leaf-specific Cyanide Production in the Presence of Aphid Herbivory This
experiment examined within-plant variation in cyanide production among leaves in garlic
mustard, but the plants were impacted by an outbreakof green peachaphids (Myzus persicae)
in our greenhouse. When plants grown as described above were 40-d-old, we classified
subsets of them as noninfested or infested (∼20–30 aphids per plant). Infested plants were
affected by aphids for approximately 2 wk at the time they were sampled. Fully expanded
third (old), fourth (intermediate), and fifth (young) true leaves of garlic mustard plants were
collected from 10–13 plants in each aphid infestation group for analysis of cyanide.
Cyanide production was compared among aphid exposures and leaf ages by using two-way
ANOVA, with aphid exposure and leaf age nested within aphid exposures as effects.
Experiment 5: Population Variation in Constitutive and Salicylic Acid-induced Levels of
Cyanide Seeds of five populations of garlic mustard collected in the wild from Dalsland,
Sweden; Marmontweg and Elderveld, the Netherlands; Hanau, Germany; and Ligonier,
Pennsylvania, were cold-stratified and grown as described above. When plants were 8 wk
J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94 87
old, five plants from each population were sprayed with a 0.05-M solution of salicylic acid,
as described by Cipollini et al. (2004). Salicylic acid induces many defense-related genes in
plants (Mauch-Mani and Metraux, 1998), but its effect on cyanide production has never
been examined. Leaf material was collected from the fully expanded fourth true leaf of each
of these plants along with each of five control plants. Cyanide production was compared
among populations and salicylate treatments with two-way ANOVA.
Experiment 6: Assessment of Sinigrin as a Source of Cyanide In this experiment, we
evaluated the ability of sinigrin, the primary glucosinolate in garlic mustard (Vaughn and
Berhow, 1999), to liberate cyanide upon enzymatic decomposition with thioglucosidase.
We incubated 0.1 ml of sinigrin (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA) at concentrations
of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/ml with 0.1 ml of 3 mg/ml thioglucosidase (E.C.
188.8.131.52 from Sinapis alba; Sigma Chemical) suspended in sodium phosphate buffer in
25 ml center-well incubation flasks, and followed the protocol for cyanide trapping and
analysis described below.
Cyanide Analysis We analyzed endogenous cyanide production in our tissues using a
method modified from Lambert et al. (1975). Briefly, a weighed amount of fresh plant
material (∼0.02–0.05 g depending on tissue and species) was ground in a cold mortar with
0.5 ml of ice-cold 0.1-M sodium phosphate buffer. The homogenate was quickly transferred
to a 25-ml center-well incubation flask, and the mortar was rinsed into the flask with an
additional 0.5 ml of phosphate buffer. To trap cyanide in the flask, 0.2 ml of 0.1 M NaOH
was placed in the center well, and the flasks were sealed and incubated at room temperature
for 18 hr. To quantify cyanide present in the trap solution, 0.1 ml of 1 M acetic acid were
added to the 0.2-ml trap solution (which was diluted as needed), followed by 1 ml of 0.25%
succinimide/0.025% N-chlorosuccinimide reagent and 0.2 ml of 3% barbituric acid–
pyridine solution. After incubation at room temperature for 10 min, absorbance at 580 nm
was recorded for each sample in a spectrophotometer. Cyanide levels were quantified
relative to a standard curve made with potassium cyanide and are expressed as milligram
cyanide per kilogram tissue fresh weight (=ppm FW).
Experiment 1 Three-week-old garlic mustard plants produced a mean level of 44.4
(±2.17) ppm cyanide from their aboveground tissues (including stems, leaves, and petioles)
and 5.4 (±2.13) ppm from their roots. These levels were significantly different from one
another (F1, 6=212.5, P<0.001).
Experiment 2 Leaf cyanide production varied among the five brassicaceous species
examined (F4, 14=526.0, P<0.001, Table 1). Levels of cyanide in leaves of 3-wk-old
garlic mustard plants were 25 times higher than in leaves of 3-wk-old A. thaliana plants and
over 150 times higher than in leaves of 3-wk-old B. kaber, B. rapa, and B. napus plants.
Experiment 3 Changes in cyanide production through time by the youngest fully expanded
leaf varied between garlic mustard and Sudan grass (time × species: F7, 2=54.02, P=0.018,
Fig. 1). Cyanide production in the youngest leaf of Sudan grass was five times higher than
88 J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94
in garlic mustard on the first sampling date, and it steadily declined to minimal levels
through the 8-wk-time course as plants aged. In contrast, cyanide production declined little
through time in garlic mustard, and by the fifth week of the time course through the end,
cyanide levels in the youngest leaves of garlic mustard plants were significantly higher than
in Sudan grass. A similar pattern was observed in cyanide production in the oldest fully
expanded leaf of garlic mustard and Sudan grass through the 4-wk-time course (time ×
species: F3, 6=150.54, P<0.001, Fig. 2). The decline in cyanide production in the oldest
leaves in Sudan grass through time was even more dramatic than in the youngest leaves.
Experiment 4 Cyanide production varied among aphid-infested and noninfested plants
(F1, 64=25.56, P<0.001) and among leaf ages within each aphid treatment (F4, 64=10.72, P<
0.001, Table 2). Cyanide production was higher in young leaves than in older leaves in
general and was lower in aphid-infested plants across all leaf ages.
Experiment 5 Significant variation in constitutive and salicylic acid (SA)-inducible cyanide
production in leaves of 8-wk-old garlic mustard plants was detected among populations
(pop: F4, 40=4.21, P=0.006; pop × SA: F4, 40=8.4, P<0.001, Table 3). Constitutive
cyanide production was higher in plants from Dalsland, Marmontweg, and Elderveld than
Week of sampling
Cyanide concentration (ppm)
Fig. 1 Mean (±1 SE) cyanide levels in the youngest fully expanded leaf of garlic mustard and Sudan grass
(Sorghum sudanense) through an 8-wk time course as plants aged. Plants were 2 wk old at the first sampling
Table 1 Mean (±1 SE) cyanide levels in leaves of 3-wk-old seedlings of five brassicaceous species
Means followed by different letters are significantly different at P=0.05.
J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–9489
in plants from Hanau and Ligonier. Although SA had little effect on cyanide production in
plants from Dalsland, Marmontweg, and Ligonier, it strongly induced cyanide production in
plants from Hanau and strongly reduced production in plants from Elderveld.
Experiment 6 Cyanide production was not detectable from the decomposition of sinigrin at
any concentration in our experimental setup.
Garlic mustard, an important invasive plant of forest understories throughout North
America, produces a wealth of chemical defenses (e.g., Cipollini et al., 2005). We
demonstrate for the first time here that garlic mustard produces substantial amounts of
cyanide from its tissues.
Week of sampling
Cyanide concentration (ppm)
Fig. 2 Mean (±1 SE) cyanide levels in the oldest fully expanded leaf of garlic mustard and Sudan grass
(Sorghum sudanense) through a 4-wk time course as plants aged. Plants were 2 wk old at the first sampling
Table 2 Mean (±1 SE) cyanide levels in young, intermediate, and old leaves of 5-wk-old seedlings of garlic
mustard in the presence and absence of green peach aphids
TreatmentLeaf ageCyanide (ppm)
Aphids absent Young
Means within an aphid treatment with different letters are significantly different at P=0.05.
90J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94
Cyanide contents reached by garlic mustard in some experiments were over 100 ppm
FW in leaves, a level considered to be acutely toxic to humans (and other vertebrates) for
plants like cassava (Jorgensen et al., 2005). In other experiments, levels in leaves ranged
from 20 to 85 ppm, levels that are still considered to be moderately toxic (Jorgensen et al.,
2005). As cyanide has known biological activity against animals, plants, and microbes
(Jones 1998; Blenis et al., 2004; Gonzalez and Sotomayor, 2005), cyanide may contribute
to some of the reported allelopathic effects of garlic mustard on other plants, insects, and
mycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Porter 1994; Prati and Bossdorf, 2004; Stinson et al., 2006), and to
its known deterrence of mammalian or avian herbivores (D. Cipollini, personal
observation). It should be noted that we expressed cyanide content in garlic mustard per
unit fresh weight, although many authors express cyanide content per unit dry weight (e.g.,
Lindroth et al., 2000). Expressing cyanide content in garlic mustard per unit dry weight
would increase levels substantially, accounting for the average moisture content of leaves.
Within each plant, cyanide production was much higher in leaves than in roots and
generally declined with leaf age. These findings are consistent with patterns of cyanide
production in the foliage and roots of many other cyanogenic plants (e.g., Vickery et al.,
1987; Busk and Møller, 2002; Fitzgerald et al., 2002; Jorgensen et al., 2005). In plants
where the roots contain high levels of cyanide, like cassava, cyanide production by leaves is
thought to be the source of cyanogenic compounds that are subsequently transported to
roots (Jorgensen et al., 2005). Unlike S. sudanense studied here, cyanogenic potential in the
youngest leaf of garlic mustard did not decline as plants aged. This indicates that garlic
mustard consistently maintains the potential for cyanide toxicity in young leaves throughout
much of its first season of growth, a pattern also seen in some other cyanogenic plants (e.g.,
Gleadow and Woodrow, 2000).
Interestingly, cyanide production was lower in aphid-infested plants across all leaf ages
than in noninfested plants. Because we classified plants as infested or noninfested after the
aphids had time to choose plants, it is possible that the patterns we observed resulted from
aphid selection of the more weakly cyanogenic individuals in our experiment. However, as
can be seen in the mean cyanide contents of the noninfested plants, individuals do not vary
to a large extent in cyanide production in this population, which is known to be relatively
genetically homogenous for other growth and defense characteristics (Cipollini 2002).
Thus, it is more likely that aphid feeding somehow caused the differences in cyanide
contents that we observed. For example, aphid feeding may have led to the volatilization of
Table 3 Mean (±1 SE) cyanide levels in leaves of 8-wk-old plants of five garlic mustard populations treated
with 0.05 M salicylic acid or a control solution
PopulationSalicylate TreatmentCyanide (ppm)
Means followed by different letters differ significantly at P=0.05 in the absence of salicylic acid. Means
followed by asterisks indicate populations where salicylic acid significantly affected cyanide levels.
J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94 91
cyanide from intact tissues before their analysis by enabling cyanide precursors and
enzymes to mix in planta, thus lowering the cyanogenic potential of the tissue at the time of
analysis. Alternatively, aphid feeding may have decreased cyanide precursor production
either directly by downregulating gene expression or indirectly through nutrient limitation
of precursor production. As cyanide production is increased by nitrogen fertilization in
many plants (e.g., Busk and Møller, 2002; Jorgensen et al., 2005), aphid feeding may have
reduced cyanide content by lowering tissue nitrogen content.
Populations varied to some extent in the constitutive and inducible production of
cyanide, similar to other cyanogenic plant species (e.g., Lindroth et al., 2000; Schappert and
Shore, 2000), but none of the six total populations studied here was acyanogenic. We have
observed differences in defense production among populations of garlic mustard (Cipollini
et al., 2005), but not enough populations were sampled in the current study to place our
observations in an evolutionary or ecological context. Salicylic acid increased, decreased,
or had no effect on cyanide production, depending upon the population studied. Salicylic
acid is involved in the induction of numerous defenses in plants in response to biotic stimuli
(Mauch-Mani and Metraux, 1998) and is known to induce cyanide-resistant respiration in
plants (Kapulnik et al., 1992). Its effect on cyanide production has not been examined in
any plant to our knowledge, but it has been shown to suppress the expression of dhurrinase
mRNA in Sorghum bicolor (Salzman et al., 2005), which would presumably decrease
cyanide production from the cyanogenic glycoside, dhurrin, found in these plants.
Garlic mustard produces substantially more cyanide than any brassicaceous plant studied
to date (e.g., Sexton and Howlett, 2000; Chandra et al., 2004), including A. thaliana and the
three Brassica species examined in this study. This appears to make garlic mustard unique
among members of this family, which are characterized by their production of
glucosinolates; cyanide production, however, has not been widely surveyed in this family.
Only a few plant species are known as producers of both glucosinolates and cyanogenic
glycosides, including Carica papaya in the Caricaceae family (Bennett et al., 1997), which
is a member of the Capparales order along with members of the Brassicaceae family
(Rodman et al., 1998). It has been suggested that glucosinolate production arose in an
already cyanogenic species (Rodman et al., 1998; Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006), and it is
perhaps surprising that so few members of the Brassicaceae have been confirmed to be
Regardless of origin, cyanide production by garlic mustard may contribute to its
unpalatability toward mustard specialist herbivores that typically prefer glucosinolate-
containing plants (Porter 1994; Haribal and Renwick, 1998; Haribal et al., 2001) and some
of its other allelopathic effects. We have noted anecdotally that treatment of garlic mustard
leaves by freezing followed by subsequent thawing and incubation at room temperature
makes them substantially more palatable and fosters better growth of larvae of the cabbage
looper, Trichoplusia ni (D. Cipollini, unpublished data). This effect may be explained, in
part, by the freezing-induced loss of cyanide from tissues. Interestingly, garlic mustard is
also distinguished among members of its family by a characteristic garlic odor when its
leaves are crushed (thus its common name). To our knowledge, the chemical profile and
significance of this volatile blend has not been examined, but cyanide is certainly a part of it.
The source of cyanide in garlic mustard could not be determined in this study. The
decomposition of glucosinolates has been suggested as a possible source in brassicaceous
plants, but this does not appear to be the source in garlic mustard. Garlic mustard contains
sinigrin (2-propenyl glucosinolate) as its primary glucosinolate (Vaughan and Berhow,
1999), but neither we nor Sexton and Howlett (2000) found that the thioglucosidase-
92J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94
catalyzed hydrolysis of this compound could liberate cyanide in vitro. Moreover, the
Brassica species and A. thaliana studied here are each well known as producers of
glucosinolates (e.g., Cipollini et al., 2003, 2004; Chandra et al., 2004), yet each gave rise to
negligible levels of cyanide in this study. The conversion of 1-amino-cyclopropane 1-
carboxylic acid (ACC) into ethylene results in some cyanide production in plants, but levels
seen here are much higher than those noted to be produced in this manner in other plant
tissues (Yip and Yang, 1998). Although not initially considered a cyanogenic compound,
garlic mustard contains a novel cyanoallyl glycoside, alliarinoside, with a –CN group as
part of the molecule (Haribal et al., 2001). It is possible that either the enzymatic or
nonenzymatic decomposition of this compound could yield volatile cyanide. If this
compound is not the source of cyanide, then either other glucosinolates or an as yet
undescribed cyanogenic compound may be the source.
Acknowledgments We thank Stephanie Enright for technical assistance, the Ohio Board of Regents for
funding, and a simple curiosity that motivated this project. Martin Heil, Nicole van Dam, and Harriet
Hillstrom kindly provided seeds of European garlic mustard plants. Two anonymous reviewers substantially
improved the manuscript.
BENNETT, R. N., KIDDLE, G., and WALLSGROVE, R. M. 1997. Biosynthesis of benzylglucosinolate,
cyanogenic glucosides and phenylpropanoids in Carica papaya. Phytochemistry 45:59–66.
BLENIS, P. V., CHOW, P. S., DUNCAN, I., and KNOWLES, N. R. 2004. Cyanide levels near fairy rings affect the
growth of grasses and fungi. Can. J. Bot. 82:1324–1329.
BUSK, P. K. and MØLLER, B. L. 2002. Dhurrin synthesis in sorghum is regulated at the transcriptional level
and induced by nitrogen fertilization in older plants. Plant Physiol. 129:1222–1231.
CHANDRA, A. K., MUKHOPADHYAY, S., LAHARI, D., and TRIPATHY, S. 2004. Goitrogenic content of Indian
cyanogenic plant foods and their in vitro anti-thyroid activity. Indian J. Med. Res. 119:180–185.
CIPOLLINI, D. F. 2002. Variation in the expression of chemical defenses in Alliaria petiolata in the field and
common garden. Am. J. Bot. 89:1422–1430.
CIPOLLINI, D. F., BUSCH, J., SIMMS, E., STOWE, K., and BERGELSON, J. 2003. Genetic variation and
relationships of constitutive and induced trypsin inhibitor activity, glucosinolate content, and biological
resistance in Brassica rapa. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:285–302.
CIPOLLINI, D. F., ENRIGHT, S., TRAW, B., and BERGELSON, J. 2004. Salicylic acid inhibits jasmonic acid-
induced resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to Spodoptera exigua. Mol. Ecol. 13:1643–1653.
CIPOLLINI, D., MBAGWU, J., HILLSTROM, C., BARTO, K., and ENRIGHT, S. 2005. Expression of constitutive
and inducible chemical defenses in native and invasive populations of Alliara petiolata. J. Chem. Ecol.
FITZGERALD, T. D., JEFFERS, P. M., and MANTELLA, D. 2002. Depletion of host-derived cyanide in the gut of
the eastern tent caterpillar, Malacosoma americanum. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:257–268.
GLEADOW, R. M. and WOODROW, I. E. 2000. Temporal and spatial variation in cyanogenic glycosides in
Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Tree Physiol. 20:591–598.
GLEADOW, R. M. and WOODROW, I. E. 2002. Constraints on the effectiveness of cyanogenic glycosides in
herbivore defense. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1301–1313.
GONZALEZ, E. and SOTOMAYOR, C. 2005. Allelopathic affects of cyanogenic glucosides on Nemaguard
peach seedlings. Cien. Inv. Agr. 32:11–15.
HALKIER, B. A. and GERSHENZON, J. 2006. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant
HARIBAL, M. and RENWICK, J. A. A. 1998. Isovitexin 6-O-β-D-glucopyranoside: a feeding deterrent to Pieris
napi oleracea from Alliaria petiolata. Phytochemistry 47:1237–1240.
HARIBAL, M., YHANG, Z., ATTYGALLE, A. B., RENWICK, J. A. A., and MEINWALD, J. 2001. A cyanoallyl
glucoside from Alliaria petiolata as a feeding deterrent for larvae of Pieris napi oleraceae. J. Nat. Prod.
JONES, D. A. 1998. Why are so many food plants cyanogenic? Phytochemistry 47:155–162.
J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–9493
JORGENSEN, K., BAK, S., BUSK, P. K., SORENSEN, C., OLSEN, C. E., PUONTI-KAERLAS, J., and MOLLER, B.
L. 2005. Cassava plants with a depleted cyanogenic glucoside content in leaves and tubers. Distribution
of cyanogenic glucosides, their site of synthesis and transport, and blockage of the biosynthesis by RNA
interference technology. Plant Physiol. 139:363–374.
KAPULNIK, Y., YALPANI, N., and RASKIN, I. 1992. Salicylic acid induces cyanide-resistant respiration in
tobacco cell-suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 100:1921–1926.
LAMBERT, J. L., RAMASAMY, J., and PAUKSTELLS, J. V. 1975. Stable reagents for the colorimetric
determination of cyanide by modified König reactions. Anal. Chem. 47:916–918.
LINDROTH, R. L., HOFMANN, R. W., CAMPBELL, B. D., MCNABB, W. C., and HUNT, D. Y. 2000. Population
differences in Trifolium repens L. response to ultraviolet-B radiation: Foliar chemistry and consequences
for two lepidopteran herbivores. Oecologia 122:20–28.
MAUCH-MANI, B. and METRAUX, J.-P. 1998. Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance to pathogen
attack. Ann. Bot. 82:535–540.
PORTER, A. 1994. Implications of introduced garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in the habitat of Pieris
virginiensis (Pieridae). J. Lepid. Soc. 48:171–172.
PRATI, D. and BOSSDORF, O. 2004. Allelopathic inhibition of germination by Alliaria petiolata
(Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:285–288.
ROBERTS, K. J. and ANDERSON, R. C. 2001. Effect of garlic mustard [Alliaria petiolata (Bieb. Cavara &
Grande)] extracts on plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Am. Midl. Nat. 146:146–152.
RODMAN, J. E., SOLTIS, P. S., SOLTIS, D. E., SYTSMA, K. J., and KAROL, K. G. 1998. Parallel evolution of
glucosinolate biosynthesis inferred from congruent nuclear and plastid gene phylogenies. Am. J. Bot.
SALZMAN, R. A., BRADY, J. A., FINLAYSON, S. A., BUCHANAN, C. D., SUMMER, E. J., SUN, F., KLEIN, P. E.,
KLEIN, R. R., PRATT, L. H., CORDONNIER-PRATT, M.-M., and MULLET, J. E. 2005. Transcriptional
profiling of sorghum induced by methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and aminocyclopropane carboxylic
acid reveals cooperative regulation and novel gene responses. Plant Physiol. 138:352–368.
SCHAPPERT, P. J. and SHORE, J. S. 2000. Cyanogenesis in Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae): Developmental
expression, heritability, and cost of cyanogenesis. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:337–352.
SEXTON, A. C. and HOWLETT, B. J. 2000. Characterization of a cyanide hydratase gene in the
phytopathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:463–470.
STINSON, K. A., CAMPBELL, S. A., POWELL, J. R., WOLFE, B. E., CALLAWAY, R. M., THELEN, G. C.,
HALLETT, S. G., PRATI, D., and KLIRONOMOS, J. N. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native
tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLOS Biol. 4/5: e140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/
VAUGHN, S. F. and BERHOW, M. A. 1999. Allelochemicals isolated from tissues of the invasive weed garlic
mustard (Alliaria petiolata). J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2495–2504.
VICKERY, P. J., WHEELER, J. L., and MULCAHY, C. 1987. Factors affecting the hydrogen cyanide potential of
white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38:1053–1059.
YIP, W. K. and YANG, S.-F. 1998. Ethylene biosynthesis in relation to cyanide metabolism. Bot. Bull. Acad.
94J Chem Ecol (2007) 33:85–94