Article

Evaluation of claspin as a proliferation marker in human cancer and normal tissues.

Molecular Carcinogenesis Group, Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
The Journal of Pathology (Impact Factor: 7.43). 02/2007; 211(3):331-9. DOI: 10.1002/path.2095
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Claspin is a nuclear protein involved in DNA replication and the DNA damage response. Its structural and functional properties suggest that it may represent a potentially useful proliferation marker. To this end, a monoclonal antibody was generated and the expression of claspin was investigated in normal fibroblasts and various cancer cell lines, as well as in tumour and normal tissues from patients with primary epithelial carcinomas. Immunoblotting analysis confirmed the specificity of the antibody, while immunohistochemistry demonstrated its applicability in archival material. In normal cells and tissues, claspin expression was weak, whereas increased levels were observed in cancer cell lines and tumour specimens. Claspin staining correlated strongly with Ki67 staining in both normal (p < 0.001) and tumour tissues (p < 0.001). However, the labelling index (LI) of claspin was consistently lower than that of Ki67, suggesting that claspin expression may be limited to a narrower part of the cell cycle. Co-localization assays with cyclin A and cell synchronization experiments indicated that claspin expression coincides with the S phase. Interestingly, the relative increase of the claspin LI in tumour samples compared with normal tissues was significantly higher (14-fold) than that of the Ki67 LI (five-fold), suggesting that claspin may be a more sensitive marker of aberrant proliferation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Petros Tsantoulis, Aug 03, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
97 Views
  • Source
    • "Claspin plays a poorly understood, positive role in DNA replication, which appears distinct from its role in checkpoint signaling. In fact, not only does expression of Claspin represent a reliable marker of cell proliferation in both human cancer and normal tissues (Tsimaratou et al., 2007), but Claspin overexpression has also been shown to increase cell proliferation (Lin et al., 2004). Our finding suggests that Claspin represents another substrate that APC/C Cdh1 keeps at low levels during G1 to avoid premature entry into S. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In response to DNA damage in G2, mammalian cells must avoid entry into mitosis and instead initiate DNA repair. Here, we show that, in response to genotoxic stress in G2, the phosphatase Cdc14B translocates from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm and induces the activation of the ubiquitin ligase APC/C(Cdh1), with the consequent degradation of Plk1, a prominent mitotic kinase. This process induces the stabilization of Claspin, an activator of the DNA-damage checkpoint, and Wee1, an inhibitor of cell-cycle progression, and allows an efficient G2 checkpoint. As a by-product of APC/C(Cdh1) reactivation in DNA-damaged G2 cells, Claspin, which we show to be an APC/C(Cdh1) substrate in G1, is targeted for degradation. However, this process is counteracted by the deubiquitylating enzyme Usp28 to permit Claspin-mediated activation of Chk1 in response to DNA damage. These findings define a novel pathway that is crucial for the G2 DNA-damage-response checkpoint.
    Cell 08/2008; 134(2):256-67. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.043 · 33.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We previously showed that checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and Claspin, two DNA-damage checkpoint proteins, were down-regulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3), a known inhibitor of cell proliferation. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the transcriptional regulation of Chk1 and Claspin and to study their expression levels in human breast cancer tissue. Transient transfection experiments in MCF-7 breast cancer cells showed that promoter activities of Chk1 and Claspin were regulated by the E2F family of transcription factors. Subsequently, transcript levels of Chk1, Claspin, and E2F1 were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis in 103 primary invasive breast carcinomas and were compared with several clinicopathologic variables in breast cancer. A strong correlation was found between Chk1 and Claspin transcript levels. Transcript levels of Chk1, Claspin, and E2F1 were highest in histologic grade 3 tumors and in tumors in which the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was lost. Moreover, Chk1 expression was significantly elevated in grade 3 breast carcinomas showing a triple-negative ER-/PR-/HER-2- phenotype compared with other grade 3 tumors. Further research is warranted to validate the use of Chk1 inhibitors in triple-negative breast carcinomas for which treatment strategies are limited at present.
    Cancer Research 08/2007; 67(14):6574-81. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3545 · 9.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: About 5-10% of breast cancer is thought to be due to an inherited disease predisposition. Currently known genes account for less than half of the hereditary cases. Claspin, a tumor suppressor protein encoded by the CLSPN gene, is involved in monitoring of replication and sensoring of DNA damage and cooperates with CHK1 and BRCA1. Association with certain cell proliferation stimulatory features has also been described. Many previously identified susceptibility factors act in similar functional pathways as claspin, suggesting possible involvement of CLSPN in heritable breast cancer susceptibility. Here we have screened affected index cases from 125 Finnish cancer families for germline defects in CLSPN using conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) and direct sequencing. Altogether seven different sequence changes were observed, but none of them appeared to associate with breast cancer susceptibility. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the mutation screening of the CLSPN gene in familial breast cancer cases.
    Cancer Letters 04/2008; 261(1):93-7. DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2007.11.003 · 5.62 Impact Factor
Show more