Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, San Luis, Missouri, United States
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.29). 01/2007; 67(11):1942-8. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247042.15547.eb
Source: PubMed


To establish the validity, reliability, and discriminative properties of the AD8, a brief informant interview to detect dementia, in a clinic sample.
We evaluated 255 patient-informant dyads. We compared the number of endorsed AD8 items with an independently derived Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and with performance on neuropsychological tests. Construct and concurrent validity, test-retest, interrater and intermodal reliability, and internal consistency of the AD8 were determined. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to assess the discriminative properties of the AD8.
Concurrent validity was strong with AD8 scores correlating with the CDR (r = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88). Construct validity testing showed strong correlation between AD8 scores, CDR domains, and performance on neuropsychological tests. The Cronbach alpha of the AD8 was 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.87), suggesting excellent internal consistency. The AD8 demonstrated good intrarater reliability and stability (weighted kappa = 0.67, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.75). Both in-person and phone administration showed equal reliability (weighted kappa = 0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73). Interrater reliability was very good (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.92). The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.95), suggesting excellent discrimination between nondemented individuals and those with cognitive impairment regardless of etiology.
The AD8 is a brief, sensitive measure that validly and reliably differentiates between nondemented and demented individuals. It can be used as a general screening device to detect cognitive change regardless of etiology and with different types of informants.

Download full-text


Available from: Catherine M Roe,
  • Source
    • "The administration of the AD8 requires minimal training and can be conducted either in person or over the phone within 3 minutes [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]. The AD8 has been previously validated to identify patients with varying severity of cognitive impairment in epidemiology studies [13] [14] [17] [19] and tertiary clinical settings [15] [16] [18] [20]. It is also well tolerated by the informants and healthcare professionals in primary healthcare settings [21]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The informant AD8 has excellent discriminant ability for dementia case finding in tertiary healthcare settings. However, its clinical utility for dementia case finding at the forefront of dementia management, primary healthcare, is unknown. Therefore, we recruited participants from two primary healthcare centers in Singapore and measured their performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and a local formal neuropsychological battery, in addition to the AD8. Logistic regression was conducted to examine the associations between demographic factors and dementia. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to establish the optimal cut-off points for dementia case finding. Of the 309 participants recruited, 243 (78.7%) had CDR = 0, 22 (7.1%) CDR = 0.5, and 44 (14.2%) CDR ≥1. Age was strongly associated with dementia, and the optimal age for dementia case finding in primary healthcare settings was ≥75 years. In this age group, the AD8 has excellent dementia case finding capability and was superior to the MMSE and equivalent to the MoCA [AD8 AUC (95% CI): 0.95 (0.91-0.99), cut-off: ≥3, sensitivity: 0.90, specificity: 0.88, PPV: 0.79 and NPV: 0.94; MMSE AUC (95% CI): 0.87 (0.79-0.94), p = 0.04; MoCA AUC (95% CI): 0.88 (0.82-0.95), p = 0.06]. In conclusion, the AD8 is well suited for dementia case finding in primary healthcare settings.
    Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD 10/2015; 49(1). DOI:10.3233/JAD-150390 · 4.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "First, we used the same interviewers to administer the AD8 instrument in all screenings so that we would not have interrater differences with regard to the study results. Second we used the same instrument, AD8, to avoid the biases of different tools used in different screening sites, and since AD8 is capable of screening very mild dementia [8–10], it would be more sensitive as compared to other tools used in the past such as MMSE [2–4]. Third, we surveyed individuals in the northern, central, southern, and eastern parts of Taiwan to reflect the status of screening results for all of Taiwan, which should be more objective when compared to other published studies in limited areas [2–7] in order to more accurately reflect and report on the status of dementia in Taiwan. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has increased in its prevalence due to the increasing aged population. Currently there is no updated data on the prevalence of dementia including its very mild stage in Taiwan. Under the extensive coverage of Mentality Protection Center (MPC), Fo Guang Shan, Taiwan, the volunteers of MPC have conducted the medicine-related services and the screening of dementia by AD8 (ascertainment of dementia 8) that can screen the dementia even at its very mild stage in general population in all Taiwan. From 2011 to 2013, in total, 2,171 participants, 368 in the northern, 549 in the central, 877 in the southern, and 377 in the eastern part, were recruited with the mean age being 66.9 ± 10.2 years old. The ratio of suspected dementia patients, AD8 score greater than or equal to 2, was 13.6% of all recruited participants with their mean AD8 score being 2.9 ± 1.3, mean age being 69.4 ± 10.8 years old, and female predominance being 73.0%. Although this is a screening study, it has extensive coverage of all Taiwan and the use of AD8 is capable of screening very mild dementia. A further study with a randomized sampling to examine the prevalence and incidence of dementia including its very mild stage is encouraged.
    05/2014; 2014(6):243738. DOI:10.1155/2014/243738
  • Source
    • "The Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT), a purely verbal cognitive screening instrument [6], was administered, on which she scored 4/28, a score at the upper limit of the normal range [7]. On the AD8, an informant screening questionnaire for dementia [8], which was completed by a family friend who had known the patient for 3 years, she scored 4/8, above the recommended cutoff for dementia [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One member of a pedigree with NARP syndrome (neurogenic weakness, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa), a mitochondrial disorder due to a point mutation at position 8993 in the mitochondrial genome ATPase 6 gene, was reevaluated some 20 years after first being reported in the medical literature. Initially assessed at age 39 years, she had retinitis pigmentosa and a mild sensory axonal neuropathy, typical features of NARP, but was otherwise clinically normal. At age 59 years, she was registered blind, had sensorineural hearing impairment, had recently been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, and may have had some mild cognitive impairment. This case shows that the clinical phenotype of NARP due to mitochondrial dysfunction may evolve over a period of decades.
    Case Reports in Neurology 09/2013; 5(3):204-7. DOI:10.1159/000357518
Show more