Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses

University of Reading Institute of Health Sciences, Reading RG1 5AG.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 02/2007; 334(7584):82. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39049.706493.55
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the evidence for strategies to prevent falls or fractures in residents in care homes and hospital inpatients and to investigate the effect of dementia and cognitive impairment.
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies grouped by intervention and setting (hospital or care home). Meta-regression to investigate the effects of dementia and of study quality and design.
Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, Cochrane Database, Clinical Trials Register, and hand searching of references from reviews and guidelines to January 2005.
1207 references were identified, including 115 systematic reviews, expert reviews, or guidelines. Of the 92 full papers inspected, 43 were included. Meta-analysis for multifaceted interventions in hospital (13 studies) showed a rate ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.997) for falls but no significant effect on the number of fallers or fractures. For hip protectors in care homes (11 studies) the rate ratio for hip fractures was 0.67 (0.46 to 0.98), but there was no significant effect on falls and not enough studies on fallers. For all other interventions (multifaceted interventions in care homes; removal of physical restraints in either setting; fall alarm devices in either setting; exercise in care homes; calcium/vitamin D in care homes; changes in the physical environment in either setting; medication review in hospital) meta-analysis was either unsuitable because of insufficient studies or showed no significant effect on falls, fallers, or fractures, despite strongly positive results in some individual studies. Meta-regression showed no significant association between effect size and prevalence of dementia or cognitive impairment.
There is some evidence that multifaceted interventions in hospital reduce the number of falls and that use of hip protectors in care homes prevents hip fractures. There is insufficient evidence, however, for the effectiveness of other single interventions in hospitals or care homes or multifaceted interventions in care homes.

Download full-text


Available from: Margot A Gosney, Jun 27, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimsTo determine the most accurate fall risk screening tools for predicting falls among patients aged 65 years or older admitted to acute care hospitals.Background Falls represent a serious problem in older inpatients due to the potential physical, social, psychological and economic consequences. Older inpatients present with risk factors associated with age-related physiological and psychological changes as well as multiple morbidities. Thus, fall risk screening tools for older adults should include these specific risk factors. There are no published recommendations addressing what tools are appropriate for older hospitalized adults.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane electronic databases were searched between January 1981–April 2013. Only prospective validation studies reporting sensitivity and specificity values were included.Review methodsRecommendations of the Cochrane Handbook of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews have been followed.ResultsThree fall risk assessment tools were evaluated in seven articles. Due to the limited number of studies, meta-analysis was carried out only for the STRATIFY and Hendrich Fall Risk Model II. In the combined analysis, the Hendrich Fall Risk Model II demonstrated higher sensitivity than STRATIFY, while the STRATIFY showed higher specificity. In both tools, the Youden index showed low prognostic accuracy.Conclusion The identified tools do not demonstrate predictive values as high as needed for identifying older inpatients at risk for falls. For this reason, no tool can be recommended for fall detection. More research is needed to evaluate fall risk screening tools for older inpatients.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 10/2014; 71(6). DOI:10.1111/jan.12542 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Background: Globally, falls in older people are a leading cause of injury-related mortality and morbidity. Cognitive impairment is a well-known risk factor for falls in this population group. While there is now a large body of evidence to support effective interventions for falls reduction across care settings, very little is known about interventions in the vulnerable, but increasing population of cognitively impaired community-dwelling older people. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to investigate interventions designed to reduce falls in community-dwelling, cognitively impaired older adults. Methods: A literature search of databases was conducted to identify original research published in English, which met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for effective (non-pharmacological) falls prevention interventions in cognitively impaired community-dwelling people over 65 years of age. Data from the selected papers were extracted into data extraction tables and analyzed according to study characteristics, measures, results, and quality. Results: The review identified 11 studies providing data from 1,928 participants. Interventions included exercise, health assessment and management of risk, multi-component and cognitive behavioral programs, and hip protectors as falls risk reduction strategies. Seven of the selected studies showed an intervention effect in decreasing falls risk; however, only two of these showed a significant improvement in physical performance measures specifically in a cognitively impaired group. Conclusions: The diversity of interventions, study designs, populations, and quality of the studies, which met inclusion criteria, resulted in conflicting evidence and inconclusive results for falls prevention interventions in this highly complex population.
    International Psychogeriatrics 10/2012; 25(2):1-13. DOI:10.1017/S1041610212001573 · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hip fractures represent an increasing public health burden with a simple fall to the floor as the most common cause. Because nursing home residents are particularly at risk, nursing homes should implement a broad range of fall prevention strategies. However, not all fall incidents can be avoided and external hip protectors may contribute to prevent hip fractures. A major problem in studying the effectiveness of hip protectors is residents’ poor adherence. In nursing homes, adherence is dependent not only on the resident, but also on staff knowledge of and attitudes about hip protectors.
    International journal of nursing studies 02/2011; 48(2):193-203. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.008 · 2.25 Impact Factor