Oliver, D. et al. Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ 334, 82

University of Reading Institute of Health Sciences, Reading RG1 5AG.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 17.45). 02/2007; 334(7584):82. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39049.706493.55
Source: PubMed


To evaluate the evidence for strategies to prevent falls or fractures in residents in care homes and hospital inpatients and to investigate the effect of dementia and cognitive impairment.
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies grouped by intervention and setting (hospital or care home). Meta-regression to investigate the effects of dementia and of study quality and design.
Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, Cochrane Database, Clinical Trials Register, and hand searching of references from reviews and guidelines to January 2005.
1207 references were identified, including 115 systematic reviews, expert reviews, or guidelines. Of the 92 full papers inspected, 43 were included. Meta-analysis for multifaceted interventions in hospital (13 studies) showed a rate ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.997) for falls but no significant effect on the number of fallers or fractures. For hip protectors in care homes (11 studies) the rate ratio for hip fractures was 0.67 (0.46 to 0.98), but there was no significant effect on falls and not enough studies on fallers. For all other interventions (multifaceted interventions in care homes; removal of physical restraints in either setting; fall alarm devices in either setting; exercise in care homes; calcium/vitamin D in care homes; changes in the physical environment in either setting; medication review in hospital) meta-analysis was either unsuitable because of insufficient studies or showed no significant effect on falls, fallers, or fractures, despite strongly positive results in some individual studies. Meta-regression showed no significant association between effect size and prevalence of dementia or cognitive impairment.
There is some evidence that multifaceted interventions in hospital reduce the number of falls and that use of hip protectors in care homes prevents hip fractures. There is insufficient evidence, however, for the effectiveness of other single interventions in hospitals or care homes or multifaceted interventions in care homes.

Download full-text


Available from: Margot A Gosney,
    • "Falls are a substantial concern across the residential and long-term aged-care sector with half its population falling annually (Haralambous et al. 2010, Nyman & Victor 2011, Burland et al. 2013). Between 25-30% of falls among older people in residential aged care result in physical injury (Oliver et al. 2007, Burland et al. 2013) and are associated with an increased risk of mortality functional decline, depression and anxiety (Rubenstein 2006, Morley 2007, Oliver et al. 2007). Frail, older people who require nursing home care are at high risk of falls as they present with combinations of; multiple co-morbidities, age-related systems decline and cognitive impairment (Rubenstein 2006, Onder et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to facilitate the implementation and operation of a falls prevention Community of Practice in a residential aged-care organization and evaluate its effect on falls outcomes. Falls are a substantial concern across the residential aged-care sector with half its older population falling annually. Preventing falls requires tailoring of current evidence for reducing falls and adoption into daily activity, which is challenging for diversely skilled staff caring for a frailer population. Forming a community of practice could provide staff with the opportunity to share and develop their expertise in falls prevention and innovate change. A mixed methods design based on a realist approach conducted across 13 residential care facilities (N = 779 beds). Staff will be invited to become a member of the community of practice with all sites represented. The community of practice will be supported to audit falls prevention activity and identify gaps in practice for intervention. The impact of the community of practice will be evaluated at three levels: individual member level, facility level and organizational level. A pre-post design using a range of standardized measures supported by audits, surveys, focus groups and interviews will determine its effect on falls prevention practice. Falls outcomes will be compared at five time intervals using negative binomial regression and logistic regression. The study is funded 2013-2017. Findings from this research will assist residential aged-care providers to understand how to effectively translate evidence about falls prevention into clinical practice. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 07/2015; DOI:10.1111/jan.12725 · 1.74 Impact Factor
    • "This approach resulted in a multitude of clinical assessment tools to identify high-risk patients as a " physiologically anticipated " group (Morse, Tylko, & Dixon, 1987). However, the value of assessment tools has been questioned (Schwendimann, Buhler, Geest, & Milisen, 2008; Oliver et al., 2007), and recently, a review of research evidence in the United Kingdom recommended that as STF assessment tools had little predictive value, all people admitted to hospital older than 65 years should automatically be considered to be at high risk of STFs (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE], 2013). So, despite numerous best-practice interventions, STFs remain one of the major patient safety events and preventable harm issues. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to use a theoretical model (bench) for human factors and ergonomics (HFE) and a comparison with occupational slips, trips, and falls (STFs) risk management to discuss patient STF interventions (bedside). Risk factors for patient STFs have been identified and reported since the 1950s and are mostly unchanged in the 2010s. The prevailing clinical view has been that STF events indicate underlying frailty or illness, and so many of the interventions over the past 60 years have focused on assessing and treating physiological factors (dizziness, illness, vision/hearing, medicines) rather than designing interventions to reduce risk factors at the time of the STF. Three case studies are used to discuss how HFE has been, or could be, applied to STF risk management as (a) a design-based (building) approach to embed safety into the built environment, (b) a staff- (and organization-) based approach, and (c) a patient behavior-based approach to explore and understand patient perspectives of STF events. The results from the case studies suggest taking a similar HFE integration approach to other industries, that is, a sustainable design intervention for the person who experiences the STF event-the patient. This paper offers a proactive problem-solving approach to reduce STFs by patients in acute hospitals. Authors of the three case studies use HFE principles (bench/book) to understand the complex systems for facility and equipment design and include the perspective of all stakeholders (bedside). © 2015, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
    Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 07/2015; 57(7). DOI:10.1177/0018720815593642 · 1.69 Impact Factor
    • "Many of the studies in these systematic reviews explicitly exclude people with dementia and the evidence base for falls prevention in this group is much weaker. One systematic review found no overall association between dementia or cognitive impairment and the impact of strategies to prevent falls or fractures in care homes and hospital (Oliver et al. 2007), suggesting that the same broad approaches will work for people with dementia. Conversely, a randomised controlled trial found that some otherwise effective strategies appear to be ineffective in people with cognitive impairment (Haines et al. 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify the potential benefits of dementia specialist nursing and to inform the implementation of roles to support people with dementia during hospital admission. Extended stays and adverse events mean that hospital admissions are costly for people with dementia, and patient experiences and outcomes can be poor. Specialist nurses have been identified as having potential to enhance care quality, reduce excess stays and reduce costs, but the evidence base for dementia specialist nurse roles has not previously been synthesised. Scoping review. Cochrane Library, Campbell Collaboration, Clinical Evidence, Evidence-Based Medicine, York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases and internet searches and personal libraries/expert consultation to identify grey literature. Initial scoping searches were used to inform more focused systematic searches. Studies directly evaluating dementia nurse specialist roles or giving evidence of effectiveness of interventions/services that could be delivered by them to improve core outcomes were identified by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. While direct evidence for the effectiveness of these roles is lacking, a number of areas were identified in which a nurse specialist role could make a contribution, including preventing adverse events and improving patient experiences and outcomes. There is a considerable body of evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions although the volume of evidence for specific interventions is not always significant. The evidence indicates that a skilled dementia specialist nurse, undertaking a clearly defined role, and working directly with people with dementia and their carers for a significant proportion of the time, could benefit people with dementia in hospitals and their family carers. Clear guidance for the development and implementation of dementia specialist nurse roles in acute hospital settings. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 12/2014; 24(9-10). DOI:10.1111/jocn.12717 · 1.26 Impact Factor
Show more