Article

Pioglitazone limits cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in rats

Laboratório de Imunologia Clínica e Experimental, Division of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
International Immunopharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.71). 01/2007; 6(13-14):1943-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.07.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Chronic cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a relevant factor in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy. Pioglitazone is an agonist of PPARgamma, capable of reducing chronic inflammation. We investigated the capacity of pioglitazone in preventing renal dysfunction. Adult male Wistar rats were assigned to: Vehicle (olive oil 1 ml/kg/day), CsA (10 mg/kg/day) alone and with pioglitazone (5 or 10 mg/kg/day). The animals were sacrificed at 28 days, where blood (serum creatinine ratio, CR) and kidney samples (arteriolopathy analyses) were collected. The mRNA transcripts of TGF-beta1, PAI-1, Smad3 and 7 were evaluated by real-time PCR. As expected, CsA treatment significantly decreased renal function that peaked at day 28, compared with vehicle (CR=1.29+/-0.03 vs. 0.95+/-0.14, p<0.05). In contrast, the administration of pioglitazone 5 or 10 mg/kg combined with CsA resulted in better renal function (CR=1.09+/-0.05 and 1.14+/-0.14, respectively, p<0.05). Animals treated with CSA showed relevant arteriolopathy (49.5+/-2.86%) and pioglitazone administration significantly limited it (37.0+/-3.59% and 36.6+/-1.72%, respectively, 5 or 10 mg/kg, p<0.05). In CsA-treated animals (alone and with pioglitazone), TGF-beta1 and Smad3 increased significantly. In animals treated with CsA and pioglitazone (5 mg/kg), PAI-1 was significantly lower than CsA alone (3.96+/-0.92 vs. 7.53+/-1.38, p<0.05). Interestingly, the administration of pioglitazone 5 or 10 mg/kg was associated with an increase in Smad7 (1.79+/-0.25 and 1.75+/-0.19, respectively), compared to vehicle and to CsA-treated groups (1.08+/-0.17 and 1.17+/-0.19, respectively, p<0.05). These data provide evidence that pioglitazone acts through down regulation of pro-fibrotic cytokine PAI-1 and overexpression of the regulatory Smad7.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
66 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gallic acid is a polyphenolic compound and is reported to be renoprotective because of its antioxidant activity in various preclinical studies. Gallic acid has been reported to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) in vitro. However, the relevance of the interplay between gallic acid and PPAR-γ in various pathologic conditions is yet to be established in vivo. The present study investigated the protective role of gallic acid against ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and the possible involvement of PPAR-γ in gallic acid-mediated renoprotection. The AKI was induced in rats through bilateral clamping of renal arteries for 40 min followed by reperfusion for 24 h. The AKI was assessed by the quantification of creatinine clearance, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, potassium level, fractional excretion of sodium, and urinary microproteins. The oxidative stress in renal tissues was quantified in terms of myeloperoxidase activity, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, superoxide anion generation, and reduced glutathione level. The histopathologic changes in renal tissues were assessed by hemotoxylin and eosin staining. The rats were administered gallic acid (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) orally for 7 d before subjecting them to AKI. The renal ischemia-reperfusion induced significant changes in plasma, urinary, and tissue parameters. The administration of gallic acid at three dose levels offered a significant protection against renal ischemia-reperfusion-induced AKI. The prior treatment with PPAR-γ antagonist, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, significantly abolished the renoprotective effect of gallic acid that confirms the involvement of PPAR-γ in gallic acid-mediated renoprotection. It is concluded that the activation of PPAR-γ significantly contributes toward gallic acid-mediated protection against ischemia-reperfusion-induced AKI.
    Journal of Surgical Research 11/2013; 187(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1088 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Context: The anticancer drug methotrexate (MTX) may cause multi-organ toxicities, including nephrotoxicity. Objective: To investigate effects of peroxisome proliferator activator receptor (PPAR)-α and -γ agonists; fenofibrate (FEN) and pioglitazone (PIO), in MTX-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Methods: Rats were given FEN or PIO (150 or 5 mg/kg/day, respectively) orally for 15 days. MTX was injected as a single dose of 20 mg/kg, i.p. at day 11 of experiment, with or without either PPAR agonists. Results: MTX induced renal toxicity, assessed by increase in serum urea and creatinine as well as histopathological alterations. MTX caused renal oxidative/nitrosative stress, indicated by decrease in GSH and catalase with increase in malondialdehyde and nitric oxide (NOx) levels. In addition, MTX increased renal level of the pro-inflammatory cytokine; tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and up-regulated the expression of both the inflammatory and apoptotic markers; NF-κB and caspase 3. Pre-administration of FEN or PIO to MTX-treated rats improved renal function and reversed oxidative/nitrosative parameters. Interestingly, pre-administration of PIO, but not FEN, decreased renal TNF-α level and NF-κB expression compared to MTX alone. Furthermore, PIO had more significant effect than FEN on reversing MTX-induced renal caspase 3 expression. Discussion: Both FEN and PIO conferred protection against MTX-induced nephrotoxicity through comparable amelioration of oxidative/nitrosative stress. FEN lacked any effect on TNF-α/NF-κB, which was reflected on its less improvement on renal histopathology and apoptosis. Conclusion: At indicated dosage, PPAR-γ ligand; PIO shows better improvement of MTX-induced nephrotoxicity compared to PPAR-α ligand; FEN due to differential effect on TNF-α/NF-κB inflammatory pathway.
    Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 02/2014; DOI:10.3109/08923973.2014.884135 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase-III inhibitor, reportedly exhibits positive effects against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced injury in several models. However, its potential role against the renal I/R insult has not been elucidated. To test whether the PPAR-γ (of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma) pathway is involved in the cilostazol effect, rats were randomized into sham, I/R, cilostazol (50 and 100 mg/kg per day, orally), pioglitazone (3 and 10 mg/kg per day, orally) and their combination at the low dose levels. Drugs regimens were administered for 14 days prior to the I/R induction. Pretreatment with cilostazol or pioglitazone provided significant protection against the I/R-induced renal injury as manifested by the attenuated serum levels of creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and cystatin C. Both drugs have also opposed the I/R-induced elevation in tissue contents/activity of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (Κim-1), nuclear factor-κB, interleuκin-18, caspase-1, as well as malondialdehyde, iNOS, myeloperoxidase, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. Nevertheless, the drugs increased both the PPAR-γ transcriptional activity and the content of glutathione. Furthermore, combining the two low doses of both drugs produced effects comparable to that of the high dose level of either drug, advocating the fortification of pioglitazone renoprotective effect when given concomitantly with cilostazol. In conclusion, cilostazol purveyed conceivable novel renoprotective mechanisms and alleviated incidents associated with acute renal injury either alone or in combination with pioglitazone partially via the elevation of PPAR-γ besides the amendment of the aforementioned biomarkers.
    PLoS ONE 05/2014; 9(5):e95313. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0095313 · 3.53 Impact Factor