Effects of a carbohydrate-restricted diet with and without supplemental soluble fiber on plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other clinical markers of cardiovascular risk.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4017, USA.
Metabolism (Impact Factor: 3.61). 02/2007; 56(1):58-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.08.021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Carbohydrate-restricted diets (CRDs) promote weight loss, reductions in plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) levels, and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels but may cause undesirable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) responses in some people. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of adding soluble fiber to a CRD on plasma LDL-C and other traditionally measured markers of cardiovascular disease. Using a parallel-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 30 overweight and obese men (body mass index, 25-35 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to supplement a CRD with soluble fiber (Konjac-mannan, 3g/d) (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15). Plasma lipids, anthropometrics, body composition, blood pressure, and nutrient intake were evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks. Compliance was excellent as assessed by 7-day weighed dietary records and ketonuria. Both groups experienced decreases in (P < .01) body weight, percent body fat, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and plasma glucose levels. After 12 weeks, HDL-C and TAG improved significantly in the fiber (10% and -34%) and placebo (14%, -43%) groups. LDL-C decreased by 17.6% (P < .01) at week 6 and 14.1% (P < .01) at week 12 in the fiber group. Conversely, LDL-C reductions were significant in the placebo group only after 12 weeks (-6.0%, P < .05). We conclude that although clearly effective at lowering LDL-C, adding soluble fiber to a CRD during active and significant weight loss provides no additional benefits to the diet alone. Furthermore, a CRD led to clinically important positive alterations in cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Download full-text


Available from: Matthew J Sharman, Jul 08, 2015
  • Source
    • "Subjects were asked to refrain from consuming eggs that were not associated with the intervention. All subjects attended a group meeting before the intervention with registered dietitians, where detailed instructions on keeping diet records and following a CRD similar to those used in our previous studies [11] [18] were discussed. Subjects were not given guidelines about energy restriction. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Carbohydrate-restricted diets (CRDs) have been shown to reduce body weight, whereas whole egg intake has been associated with increased satiety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of additional dietary cholesterol and protein provided by whole eggs while following a CRD on insulin resistance and appetite hormones. Using a randomized blind parallel design, subjects were allocated to an egg (640 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol) or placebo (0 mg/d additional dietary cholesterol) group for 12 weeks while following a CRD. There were significant reductions in fasting insulin (P < .025) and fasting leptin concentrations (P < .01) for both groups, which were correlated with the reductions in body weight and body fat (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Both groups reduced insulin resistance as measured by the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (P < .025). There was a significant decrease in serum glucose levels observed after the intervention. We did not observe the expected increases in plasma ghrelin levels associated with weight loss, suggesting a mechanism by which subjects do not increase appetite with CRD. To confirm these results, the subjective measures of satiety using visual analog scale showed that both groups felt more "full" (P < .05), "satisfied" (P < .001), and "wanted to eat less" (P < .001) after the intervention. These results indicate that inclusion of eggs in the diet (additional dietary cholesterol) did not modify the multiple beneficial effects of CRD on insulin resistance and appetite hormones.
    Nutrition research 05/2009; 29(4):262-8. DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2009.03.007 · 2.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Diets promoting weight loss and reducing atherogenic lipid profiles have typically been founded on the belief that lowering total dietary fat with particular attention to saturated fats would produce the most effective change in lipids and weight. However, increasingly, data gathered over the last few years challenges that notion and, in fact, indicate that better weight loss, better satiety, and better lipid profiles may result when the diet is low in carbohydrate and no restriction on fat content is adopted [4] [8] [22] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]. In this short 8-week study, improved lipid profiles with respect to LDL patterns and the similar compliance to such dietary plans suggests that further examination of such a pattern is worthy and must be examined in the context of long-term health. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diets designed to promote weight loss and improve atherogenic lipid profiles traditionally include a reduction in total fat and, in particular, saturated fats. This study was designed to test the efficacy of a low-fat diet vs a carbohydrate (CHO)-restricted (low-CHO) diet in hypertriglyceridemic patients on lipid profile, weight loss, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and satiety. Twenty-eight hypertriglyceridemic subjects (based on fasting triacylglycerol [TG] levels exceeding 1.69 mmol/L) were randomized to either the low-CHO or low-fat diet for 8 weeks. Fasting bloods were acquired at weeks 0 and 8 and analyzed for lipids and hs-CRP. Body weight and other anthropometric measures were also obtained. Three random 24-hour food recalls were used to assess compliance during the trial and 2 recalls before randomization to permit individualized dietary education. A significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed (P = .045), wherein the small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were reduced by 46% in the low-CHO-assigned subjects and increased by 36% for those assigned the low-fat plan. The observed decrease in TG (18%) among low-CHO subjects, in contrast to the 4% increase for low-fat group, was not significant, nor were there significant differences in hs-CRP, overall dietary compliance, satiety, or the magnitude of body weight loss between groups (low-CHO group, -3.8% vs low-fat group, -1.6%). Favorable reductions in small low-density lipoprotein concentrations after 8 weeks suggest that a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (20% CHO as energy) can promote a less atherogenic lipid profile when compared to the low-fat diet.
    Nutrition research 08/2008; 28(7):443-9. DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.013 · 2.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article discusses metabolic syndrome, which has recently been defined by the National Institutes of Health (2001) and affects approximately 47 million Americans. Suggestions have been included for risk factor identification, prevention measures, and intervention guidelines for the components of metabolic syndrome. Many Americans with metabolic syndrome will be in the workplace. Thus, the role of the occupational health nurse in the prevention of metabolic syndrome is vital. Prevention measures for metabolic syndrome focus on the education and encouragement of employees to attain or maintain healthy lifestyles. For employees with identified risk factors, collaboration between the occupational health nurse and the employee provide an avenue for healthy employee outcomes.
    AAOHN Journal 02/2003; 51(1):28-37. · 0.61 Impact Factor