Article

Comparison of CPAP titration at home or the sleep laboratory in the sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome.

Department of Sleep Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 12/2006; 29(11):1451-5.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is conventionally started after in-laboratory overnight titration. This use of sleep laboratory space is both costly and limits access for diagnostic studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether automated CPAP titration in the home produced patient outcomes equal to those following laboratory-based automated CPAP titration. The main outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, objective daytime sleepiness (Oxford SLEep Resistance test or OSLER test), and CPAP use; we also performed quality-of-life questionnaires: Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire and SF-36.
Prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial
Regional sleep center and patients' homes.
Two hundred CPAP-naïve patients with OSAHS requiring CPAP treatment.
One hundred patients were randomly assigned to a standard 1-night in-hospital CPAP titration and 100 to 3 nights' home CPAP titration and then issued with fixed pressure CPAP. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
The patient groups did not differ at baseline. The CPAP pressures defined at titration (mean+/- SEM: 10.6+/-0.2, 10.4+/-0.2 cm H20, p = .19), number of mask leaks, and initial acceptance rates were similar in the sleep-laboratory and home-titrated groups. At 3-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in CPAP use (mean+/-SEM: 4.39+/-0.25, 4.38+/-0.25 h/night; p > .9), Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (9.5+/-0.5, 8.5+/-0.5, p = .14), OSLER, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, or SF-36 between the sleep-laboratory and home-titrated groups.
Home-based automated CPAP titration is as effective as automatic in-laboratory titrations in initiating treatment for OSAHS.

0 Followers
 · 
227 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objectiveNocturnal application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Determination of the therapeutic pressure (CPAP titration) is usually performed by a technician in the sleep laboratory during attended polysomnography. One possible alternative to manual titration is automated titration. Indeed, during the last 15 years, devices have been developed that deliver autoadjustable CPAP (A-CPAP). The aim of the present study was to compare the titration effectiveness of two A-CPAP devices using different flow-based algorithms in patients with OSA. Methods This is a randomized study; 79 subjects underwent two consecutive unattended home A-CPAP titration nights with two different devices (Autoset Resmed; Remstar Auto Respironics); during the third and the fourth night, patients underwent portable monitoring in the sleep laboratory during fixed CPAP at the A-CPAP recommended pressure. ResultsBland Altman plots showed good agreement between the recommended median and maximal pressure levels obtained with the two devices. A significant improvement was observed in all the sleep parameters by both A-CPAP machines to a similar degree. Conclusions It was observed that the two A-CPAP devices using different algorithms are equally effective in initial titration of CPAP.
    Respirology 08/2013; 18(6). DOI:10.1111/resp.12098 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La CPAP es el tratamiento de elección en pacientes con SAHS. Los pacientes con un IAH > 5 y síntomas, son susceptibles de tratamiento con CPAP nasal. Si no tienen síntomas, con patología cardiovascular, se debe considerar el tratamiento si el IAH >30, especialmente en pacientes con edad inferior a 70 años. Puesto que no es un tratamiento curativo, debe usarse de forma continuada, y para esto debemos hacer un ajuste de la presión óptima, para la que es imprescindible una adecuada información y preparación del enfermo, pudiendo realizarse diversas técnicas para el ajuste. La PSG completa en el laboratorio de sueño es la que mejor asegura la corrección de todos los fenómenos patológicos (respiratorios y neurológicos). Pero debido a lo costoso y largo del procedimiento y a las largas listas de espera se han propuesto otras opciones como son la PSG en noche partida para pacientes con IAH>20, el ajuste empírico mediante fórmula matemática, que puede usarse de manera provisional, a la espera de titulación, y un sistema de Auto-CPAP validado y con análisis visual (Normativa SEPAR 2010). Uno de los procedimientos más extendidos, para titular la presión de CPAP es el uso de equipos de CPAP automática. Existe una gran diversidad de equipos, con comportamientos diferentes, ya que utilizan un algoritmo de presión diferente, y variables distintas. Sin embargo, en otros estudios clínicos no se han encontrado diferencias. Estos, miden varias variables respiratorias, para detectar anormalidades respiratorias. Básicamente existen 3 variables de medida: flujo, ronquido e impedancia (valorada mediante oscilación forzada). Aunque inicialmente no todos los equipos utilizaban todas las variables, hoy la mayoría utilizan todas ellas con diferentes algoritmos.
  • Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 10/2010; 27. DOI:10.1016/S0761-8425(10)70019-X · 0.49 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
239 Downloads
Available from