Article

Life stress, coping and comorbid youth: an examination of the stress-vulnerability model for substance relapse.

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Journal of psychoactive drugs (Impact Factor: 1.1). 10/2006; 38(3):255-62. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2006.10399851
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The stress-vulnerability model of addiction relapse states that the impact of life stress on alcohol and other drug use is influenced by several types of psychosocial risk and protective factors. Coping skills have been shown to be protective against alcohol or other drug use in adolescents and adults. To date, the influence of life stress and coping on addiction relapse has not been investigated among substance use disordered youth with comorbid Axis I psychopathology. In the present study, 80 adolescents, ages 13 to 17, were followed six months after treatment for substance use and Axis I disorders. Participants completed measures of psychopathology, substance use, life stressors and coping during treatment and at three and six months following treatment. Coping ability best predicted youth substance use at six months. Negative life events moderated the relation between coping and frequency of substance use. These results suggest that coping is a protective factor for return to substance involvement post-treatment, particularly for comorbid youth who have experienced high levels of life stress.

1 Follower
 · 
101 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: National efforts have focused on improving adolescent substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes, yet improvements remain modest. Because adolescents are noteworthy for heterogeneity in their clinical profiles, treatment might be enhanced by the identification of clinical subgroups for which interventions could be more effectively tailored. Some of these subgroups, such as those based on abstinence motivation, substance involvement, and psychiatric status are promising candidates. This study examined the unique predictive utility of adolescents' primary reason for alcohol and other drug use. Adolescent outpatients (N = 109; 27% female, aged 14-19) were assessed at treatment intake on their reason for substance use, as well as demographic, substance use, and clinical variables, and reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Reason for use fell into two broad domains: using to enhance a positive state (positive reinforcement [PR]; 47% of youth) and using to cope with a negative state (negative reinforcement [NR]; 53% of youth). Compared with PR patients, NR patients were significantly more substance involved, reported more psychological distress, and had a more extensive treatment history. It is important to note that NR patients showed a significant treatment response, whereas PR patients showed no improvement. PR-NR status also uniquely predicted treatment response and outcome independent of a variety of other predictors, including abstinence motivation, self-efficacy, coping, and prior treatment. Adolescents' primary reason for substance use may provide unique clinical information that could inform treatment planning and patient-treatment matching. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
    Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 12/2012; 27(4). DOI:10.1037/a0031065 · 2.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drug-induced sensitization has been associated with enhanced self-administration and may contribute to addiction. The possible association between sensitization and voluntary ethanol consumption using an addiction model was investigated. Mice (n = 60) were individually housed with ad libitum access to food and had free choice between ethanol (5% and 10%) and water in a four-phase paradigm: free choice (12 weeks), withdrawal (2 weeks), re-exposure (2 weeks), and quinine-adulteration (2 weeks). Control mice (n = 10) had access to water. Mice were characterized as addicted (n = 10, ethanol preference without reducing intake with adulterated ethanol), heavy (n = 22, ethanol preference but reduced intake with adulterated ethanol), and light (n = 21, water preference). Oral ethanol then was withdrawn, and 24 h later mice received a 2 g/kg ethanol (i.p.) challenge dose or saline, and ambulation was evaluated 10 min later. Half of the classified mice received daily 2 g/kg ethanol injections for 14 days, and ambulation was assessed 10 min after the last dose. Acute ethanol increased ambulation in all groups compared to the control group, and chronic ethanol induced sensitization, showing no difference among ethanol-treated mice. The data suggest that independent neural mechanisms are responsible for the development of addiction and sensitization.
    Journal of Neural Transmission 02/2008; 115(1):43-54. DOI:10.1007/s00702-007-0843-0 · 2.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Orientadora : Roseli Boerngen de Lacerda Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmacologia. Defesa: Curitiba, 2007 Inclui bibliografia