Cybercartography of popular internet sites used by New York City men who have sex with men interested in bareback sex.

HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York 10032, USA.
AIDS Education and Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.59). 01/2007; 18(6):475-89. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2006.18.6.475
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A systematic method was used to elicit the names of the six most popular free Internet sites used by gay men and other men who have sex with men in New York City, to meet partners for "bareback" sex. An analysis of the sites characteristics shows that men can use mainstream Internet sites, gay-specific sites, and sex-focused sites free of charge to search for bareback sex partners, selecting by location, physical attributes, sexual mode, HIV-serostatus, and other characteristics. Many individuals use these sites, producing the impression that bareback sex is not an oddity confined to just a few. The official language of the bareback sites associates bareback sex with masculinity and courage, prioritizing pleasure, freedom, choice, and intimacy over HIV-transmission prevention. The sites facilitate sexual experimentation and the expansion of bareback networks. Although some consider bareback sex to represent a failure of HIV prevention, this study suggests that harm reduction strategies may be viable within bareback networks.

  • International Journal of Sexual Health 07/2013; 25(3). DOI:10.1080/19317611.2013.764375 · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Qualitative studies of the sexual risk practices of Portuguese men who have sex with men (MSM) are scarce, as have been campaigns to target this group despite high HIV infection rates. This study investigates the concepts and practices of safer sex of a group of 36 Portuguese self-identified gay men (age: x = 34.4, SD = 9.1) who have met sexual partners online; two identified as HIV positive. Thematic analysis of interviews showed that our participants were aware of HIV transmission risks and tended to protect themselves in most sexual practices. Oral sex and steady relationships, however, did not always include safer practices. Participants tended to rely on indirect sources of information when assessing their partners' HIV status, such as their physical characteristics or the information available in online profiles. Contrasting HIV positive and negative men's sexual expectations and practices indicated that communication shortcomings might be putting some at risk. Findings suggest that safe sex is a relational practice which can only be understood and addressed within the context in which it occurs.
    Cadernos de Saúde Pública 11/2014; 30(11):2423-2432. DOI:10.1590/0102-311X00134813 · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gay men’s use of the Internet to meet other gay men for social and sexual purposes is now so common that some predict the end of gay bars and other face-to-face hooking-up settings. There is speculation that the Internet is responsible for increases in sexually transmissible infections and HIV incident infections in a number of cities, both in the USA and elsewhere. In New York City, where this study took place, the use of Internet by men to meet other men seeking sex without condoms, called bareback sex, has created concerns among public health and gay community HIV/AIDS workers. Is the Internet at fault here? If so, how does it work to incite such risk-taking, if it is that? If not, what then is going on inside these barebacking sites? This study of six popular bareback sites seeks to understand the nature of this new online sexual culture, by investigating, first, the actual sites as cultural production through the methodological approach of cybercartography. Then, in a second stage, users of these sites were interviewed. During the cybercartography, however, the investigation suggested that the recent conceptual recuperation of masculinity as an analytic in gender studies might offer some value in understanding what was happening sexually and culturally on these sites. Men’s sexual desires were also revealed to be forming and reforming in relation to the sites, and issues of race and ethnicity emerged to challenge singular notions of masculinity. This paper suggests that masculinity itself might need some recalibration if it is to come to grips with the performative richness of the Internet and its sexual potential. We may also need to understand these sites not simply as inciting risk-taking behaviour but as evolving sexual cultures in their own right.
    Sexualities 02/2008; 11(1-2):121-141. DOI:10.1177/1363460707085467 · 0.63 Impact Factor