Article

Respiratory physiotherapy to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery - A systematic review

Division of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Chest (Impact Factor: 7.13). 01/2007; 130(6):1887-99. DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1887
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the efficacy of respiratory physiotherapy for prevention of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.
We searched in databases and bibliographies for articles in all languages through November 2005. Randomized trials were included if they investigated prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy and pulmonary outcomes, and if the follow-up was at least 2 days. Efficacy data were expressed as risk differences (RDs) and number needed to treat (NNT), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Thirty-five trials tested respiratory physiotherapy treatments. Of 13 trials with a "no intervention" control group, 9 studies (n = 883) did not report on significant differences, and 4 studies (n = 528) did: in 1 study, the incidence of pneumonia was decreased from 37.3 to 13.7% with deep breathing, directed cough, and postural drainage (RD, 23.6%; 95% CI, 7 to 40%; NNT, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.5 to 14); in 1 study, the incidence of atelectasis was decreased from 39 to 15% with deep breathing and directed cough (RD, 24%; 95% CI, 5 to 43%; NNT, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.4 to 18); in 1 study, the incidence of atelectasis was decreased from 77 to 59% with deep breathing, directed cough, and postural drainage (RD, 18%; 95% CI, 5 to 31%; NNT, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.3 to 19); in 1 study, the incidence of unspecified pulmonary complications was decreased from 47.7% to 21.4 to 22.2% with intermittent positive pressure breathing, or incentive spirometry, or deep breathing with directed cough (RD, 25.5 to 26.3%; NNT, 3.8 to 3.9). Twenty-two trials (n = 2,734) compared physiotherapy treatments without no intervention control subjects; no conclusions could be drawn.
There are only a few trials that support the usefulness of prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy. The routine use of respiratory physiotherapy after abdominal surgery does not seem to be justified.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Patrick Pasquina, Jun 28, 2015
4 Followers
 · 
557 Views
  • Source
    Physiotherapy 06/2013; 99(2):119. · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing oesophageal surgery have a high risk for post-operative complications including pulmonary infections. Recently, physical therapy has shifted from the post-operative to the pre-operative phase to diminish post-operative complications and to shorten hospital stay. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility and initial effectiveness of pre-operative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on the incidence of pneumonia in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. METHODS: A pragmatic non-randomized controlled trial was conducted among all patients who underwent an oesophagectomy between January 2009 and February 2010. Patients in the intervention group received IMT prior to surgery. Feasibility was assessed on the basis of the occurrence of adverse effects during testing or training and patient satisfaction. Initial effectiveness on respiratory function was evaluated by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and endurance, the incidence of post-operative pneumonia and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included, of which 44 received pre-operative IMT. No adverse effects were observed. IMT was well tolerated and appreciated. In the intervention group, the median MIP and endurance improved significantly after IMT by 32% and 41%, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of post-operative pneumonia and the length of hospital stay were comparable for the intervention and the conventional care groups (pneumonia, 25% vs. 23% [p = 0.84]; hospitalization, 13.5 vs. 12 days [p = 0.08]). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative IMT is feasible in patients with oesophageal carcinoma and significantly improves respiratory muscle function. This, however, did not result in a reduction of post-operative pneumonia in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Physiotherapy Research International 03/2013; 18(1). DOI:10.1002/pri.1524
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thoracic surgery may cause reduced respiratory function and pulmonary complications, with associated increased risk of mortality. Postoperative physiotherapy aims to reverse atelectasis and secretion retention, and may include incentive spirometry. To review the evidence for incentive spirometry, examining the physiological basis, equipment and its use following thoracic surgery. MEDLINE was searched from 1950 to January 2008, EMBASE was searched from 1980 to January 2008, and CINAHL was searched from 1982 to January 2008, all using the OVID interface. The search term was: '[incentive spirometry.mp]'. The Cochrane Library was searched using the terms 'incentive spirometry' and 'postoperative physiotherapy'. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Resource Centre was also searched, and a hand search was performed to follow-up references from the retrieved studies. Non-scientific papers were excluded, as were papers that did not relate to thoracic surgery or the postoperative treatment of patients with incentive spirometry. Initially, 106 studies were found in MEDLINE, 99 in EMBASE and 42 in CINAHL. Eight references were found in the Cochrane Library and one paper in the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Resource Centre. Four studies and one systematic review investigating the effects of postoperative physiotherapy and incentive spirometry in thoracic surgery patients were selected and reviewed. Physiological evidence suggests that incentive spirometry may be appropriate for lung re-expansion following major thoracic surgery. Based on sparse literature, postoperative physiotherapy regimes with, or without, the use of incentive spirometry appear to be effective following thoracic surgery compared with no physiotherapy input.
    Physiotherapy 07/2009; 95(2):76-82. DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.003 · 2.11 Impact Factor