Peer Reviewed: Efficacy of an Emergency Department-based Motivational Teenage Smoking Intervention

West Virginia University, Department of Community Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Office of Drug Abuse Intervention Studies, P.O. Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Preventing chronic disease (Impact Factor: 1.96). 02/2007; 4(1):A08.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Motivational interviewing techniques have been minimally researched as a function of a teenage smoking intervention. The present study examined the efficacy of a theory-based motivational tobacco intervention (MTI).
A randomized two-group design was used to compare 6-month post-baseline quit and reduction rates among teenagers who received the MTI with those who received brief advice or care as usual. Participants were smokers aged 14 to 19 years (N = 75) who presented for treatment in a university-affiliated hospital emergency department (ED). Motivational interviewing techniques were used by trained providers to facilitate individual change; stage-based take-home materials also were provided.
Similar to past clinic-based studies of motivational interviewing with teenage smokers, our study found negative results in terms of intervention efficacy for cessation. Six-month follow-up cessation rates were nonsignificant--two teenagers quit smoking. Among teenagers who were available at follow-up, a medium effect size (Cohen's h = .38) was found for reduction and a large effect size (Cohen's h = .69) was found for percentage reduction, although these results also were not statistically significant.
Although the major findings of this study were not significant, the reductions in tobacco use suggest that motivational interviewing may be a clinically relevant counseling model for use in teenage smoking interventions. However, many questions remain, and the current literature lacks studies on trials with significant outcomes using motivational interviewing in smoking cessation. Additionally, more research is needed to examine the suitability of the ED for MTI-type interventions.

Download full-text


Available from: Candice W Hamilton, Apr 10, 2015
  • Source
    • "In one study, teens who had been arrested or required to appear in court for a variety of offenses were given the option to participate in a diversionary program (Helstrom & Hutchison 2007). The other study recruited participants for treatment who presented for care for any reason in an emergency room in a suburban, university-affiliated hospital (Horn et al. 2007). Neither study reported significant treatment effects. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of premature morbidity and mortality in the United States. The majority of children smoke their first cigarette in early adolescence, and many older teens have well-established dependence on nicotine. Efforts to promote and support smoking cessation among these youth smokers are critical. The available experimental studies of youth cessation interventions find that behavioral interventions increase the chances of youth smokers achieving successful cessation. Currently there is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments with youth smokers. Many innovative studies have been compromised by challenges in recruiting sufficient numbers of youth, obtaining approval for waivers of parental consent, and high attrition in longitudinal studies. Key areas for future work include bridging the fields of adolescent development and treatment design, matching treatments to developmental trajectories of smoking behavior, better understanding treatment processes and treatment moderators, and building demand for evidence-based cessation treatments.
    Annual Review of Psychology 02/2009; 60:229-55. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163659 · 20.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Preventing chronic disease 02/2007; 4(1):A02. · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Preventing chronic disease 02/2007; 4(1):A01. · 1.96 Impact Factor
Show more