The epidemiology of major joint contractures: a systematic review of the literature.

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.88). 04/2007; 456:22-9. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180308456
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current knowledge on the epidemiology of major joint contractures is limited. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies examining the epidemiology of joint contracture regardless of clinical condition. Epidemiologic measures of interest were prevalence, incidence, and prognostic risk factors. We used Medline to identify all epidemiologic studies of major joint contractures published from 1966 to March 2005. There was a high prevalence of major joint contractures. Most studies focused on one joint rather than including all relevant major contractures. However, most studies did provide a definition of a contracture or the measures used to assess contractures. Immobility is a highly prevalent disability in at-risk populations, and constitutes a tremendous burden to patients in nursing homes, hospitals, and the outpatient community. The lack of epidemiologic data is a major impediment to providing appropriate treatment.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: By proposing a new terminology (acquired deforming hypertonia or ADH) and a new definition for contractures, the main objective of this study was to establish their prevalence among institutionalized elderly patients. Secondary objectives were to analyze the negative impact of ADH and collect the opinions of clinicians on the possible treatments available. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among residents of 39 geriatric institutions (29 EHPAD and 10 USLD). All subjects presenting at least one ADH were surveyed over a one-week period. Among 3145 observed patients (mean age 88.9±9.7years) 22% (n=692) presented at least one ADH. In average, each patient presented 4.4±3.2 ADHs. Negative consequences on self-care, nursing and difficulties in getting dressed were most frequently observed. Only 25.4% of clinicians considered the ADH to be potentially reversible. Physical therapy was the therapeutic option most frequently chosen over medication and surgery. This study confirms the important prevalence of ADH among elderly institutionalized patients. Consequences on the level of dependence were significant. It seems relevant to elaborate hierarchical therapeutic strategies in order to counter these disorders and the fatalism that ensues.
    Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine 12/2013; 57(1). DOI:10.1016/
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What is the incidence of contractures six months after stroke? Can factors measured within four weeks of stroke predict the development of elbow, wrist, and ankle contractures six months later? Prospective cohort study. Consecutive sample of 200 adults with stroke admitted to a Sydney hospital. Loss of range of motion in major joints of the body was measured using a 4-point ordinal contracture scale. In addition, elbow extension, wrist extension, and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion were measured using torque-controlled procedures. Potential predictors of contracture were age, pre-morbid function, severity of stroke, muscle strength, spasticity, motor function, and pain. Measurements were obtained within four weeks of stroke and at six months after stroke. 52% of participants developed at least one contracture. Incidence of contracture varied across joints from 12% to 28%; shoulders and hips were most commonly affected. Muscle strength was a significant predictor of elbow, wrist, and ankle joint range. Prediction models explained only 6% to 20% of variance in elbow, wrist, and ankle joint range. About half of all patients with stroke develop at least one contracture within six months of stroke. Incidence of contractures across all joints ranged from 12% to 28%. Muscle strength is a significant predictor of elbow, wrist, and ankle contractures but cannot be used to accurately predict contractures in these joints.
    Journal of physiotherapy 03/2012; 58(1):41-7. DOI:10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70071-1 · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prolonged immobility during a critical illness may predispose patients to the development of joint contracture. We sought to document the incidence of, the risk factors for and the reversibility of joint contractures among patients who stayed in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) for 2 weeks or longer. We conducted a chart review to collect data on the presence of and risk factors for joint contractures in the shoulders, elbows, hips, knees and ankles among patients admitted to the ICU between January 2003 and March 2005. At the time of transfer out of the ICU, at least 1 joint contracture was recorded in 61 (39%) of 155 patients; 52 (34%) of the patients had joint contractures of an extent documented to impair function. Time spent in the ICU was a significant risk factor for contracture: a stay of 8 weeks or longer was associated with a significantly greater risk of any joint contracture than a stay of 2 to 3 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 7.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-38.9; p = 0.02). Among the variables tested, only the use of steroids conferred a protective effect against joint contractures (adjusted OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.83; p = 0.02). At the time of discharge to home, which occurred a median of 6.6 weeks after transfer out of intensive care, 50 (34%) of the 147 patients not lost to follow-up still had 1 or more joint contractures, and 34 (23%) of the patients had at least 1 functionally significant joint contracture. Following a prolonged stay in the ICU, a functionally significant contracture of a major joint occurred in more than one-third of patients, and most of these contractures persisted until the time of discharge to home.
    Canadian Medical Association Journal 04/2008; 178(6):691-7. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.071056 · 5.81 Impact Factor