Article

Time trends for HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance among antiretroviral-experienced and naive pregnant women in New York City during 1991 to early 2001.

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (Impact Factor: 4.39). 03/2007; 44(3):329-35. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31802f1296
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Time trends in the prevalence of drug resistance to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnant women have not been studied. Treatment and prophylactic efficacy could be compromised by drug-resistant HIV strains. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of antiretroviral resistance mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and of major mutations to protease inhibitors (PIs) in virus isolates from 300 HIV-infected pregnant women in New York City from 1991 to early 2001. The overall prevalence of mutations for NRTIs from 1991 to early 2001 was higher for ART-experienced (25.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.1% to 32.1%]) than ART-naive (8.6% [95% CI: 3.7% to 13.4%]) mothers (P < 0.002). For NNRTIs, the overall prevalence of mutations was somewhat higher among ART-experienced (5.8% [95% CI: 2.3% to 9.3%]) versus ART-naive (1.6% [95% CI: 0% to 3.7%]) women (P = 0.06), and increased over time for ART-naive women (0%-7.4%; P = 0.03) and ART-experienced women (0%-19.4%; P = 0.0002). The prevalence of PI-associated mutations was also higher overall among ART-experienced mothers (5.8% [95% CI: 2.3% to 9.3%] vs. 1.6% [95% CI: 0% to 3.7%]; P = 0.06), with increases over time seen for ART-naive women (0%-7.4%; P = 0.03) and ART-experienced women (0%-16.1%; P = 0.0008). The increasing prevalence of drug resistance in pregnant women, including those who are drug-naive, underscores the necessity for resistance testing to guide treatment to achieve suppression of the mother's virus.

0 Followers
 · 
55 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A substantial number of studies have been performed across the world to determine transmitted drug resistance. Large variations between different parts of the world can be expected because of differences in availability over time of treatment. Time trend analyses are often not possible because of small numbers of included patients. In this review, we present the available data on the transmission of drug-resistant HIV, with a major emphasis on the time trends of drug resistance prevalences. We identified relevant literature by searching in PubMed through September 2009. Studies were grouped, according to the year of data collection, into the following time periods: < 2001, 2001-2003, > 2003. We selected a total of 215 studies, which included 43,170 patients. The following prevalences of transmission of drug-resistant HIV were found, in rank order: North America (12.9%), Europe (10.9%), Latin America (6.3%), Africa (4.7%), and Asia (4.2%). Changes over time in particular drugs classes were found in all parts of the world. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance declined over time in North America (p = 0.03), Europe (p < 0.001), and Latin America (p < 0.001). The decline in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance reflects the improvement of treatment regimens in resource-rich settings. In contrast the resistance prevalence increased in Asia (p = 0.047) and Africa (p < 0.001). This can be explained by the antiretrovirals becoming more available during recent years in these continents. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance rose over time in North America (p < 0.001), Europe (p < 0.001), Latin America (p < 0.001), and Asia (p = 0.01). This paper gives a complete overview of the epidemiology of resistance of antiretroviral drugs in drug-naive patients worldwide. The time trends that were observed seem to reflect changes in describing prescriptions over time. Changes include the more wide-spread use of antiretroviral drugs in developing countries and the development of therapies from low-active mono-therapies to highly active antiretroviral regimens in the industrialized countries.
    AIDS reviews 14(1):17-27. · 4.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 strains has been gaining attention and is becoming a growing problem throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDRM) among antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-infected pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: ARV-naïve pregnant women were recruited at Hospital Geral de Nova Iguacu (HGNI), Rio de Janeiro, from 2005-2008. HIV genotyping was carried out using ViroSeq (Abbott v 2.0). TDRM were detected using the Calibrated Population Resistance Tool -CPR v. 6.0.The prevalence of mutations associated with resistance in the protease and reverse transcriptase regions of the HIV genome were assessed in samples collected prior to initiation of ARV prophylaxis or treatment. Results: Among 238 eligible specimens that were collected, 197 samples were successfully amplified using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Eighty one percent of women were infected with HIV subtype B, 10% with subtype F1 viruses, 1.0% with subtype C virus and 8.0% with recombinant forms of the virus. The prevalence of HIV TDRM was 5.6% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 2.0% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and 3.0% for protease inhibitors. The overall prevalence of any drug resistance was 10.7%. There were no multiclass resistant strains identified in the analyzed samples. Conclusions: The prevalence of HIV TDRM among the pregnant women in our cohort was moderate. Resistance testing should be encouraged in Rio de Janeiro, among other locations, for all HIV- infected pregnant women prior to prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.
    AIDS research and human retroviruses 12/2012; DOI:10.1089/AID.2011.0333 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Raltegravir (MK-0518) is an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase active against HIV-1 susceptible or resistant to older antiretroviral drugs. We conducted two identical trials in different geographic regions to evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltegravir, as compared with placebo, in combination with optimized background therapy, in patients infected with HIV-1 that has triple-class drug resistance in whom antiretroviral therapy had failed. Patients were randomly assigned to raltegravir or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. In the combined studies, 699 of 703 randomized patients (462 and 237 in the raltegravir and placebo groups, respectively) received the study drug. Seventeen of the 699 patients (2.4%) discontinued the study before week 16. Discontinuation was related to the study treatment in 13 of these 17 patients: 7 of the 462 raltegravir recipients (1.5%) and 6 of the 237 placebo recipients (2.5%). The results of the two studies were consistent. At week 16, counting noncompletion as treatment failure, 355 of 458 raltegravir recipients (77.5%) had HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies per milliliter, as compared with 99 of 236 placebo recipients (41.9%, P<0.001). Suppression of HIV-1 RNA to a level below 50 copies per milliliter was achieved at week 16 in 61.8% of the raltegravir recipients, as compared with 34.7% of placebo recipients, and at week 48 in 62.1% as compared with 32.9% (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Without adjustment for the length of follow-up, cancers were detected in 3.5% of raltegravir recipients and in 1.7% of placebo recipients. The overall frequencies of drug-related adverse events were similar in the raltegravir and placebo groups. In HIV-infected patients with limited treatment options, raltegravir plus optimized background therapy provided better viral suppression than optimized background therapy alone for at least 48 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00293267 and NCT00293254.)
    New England Journal of Medicine 07/2008; 359(4):339-54. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0708975 · 54.42 Impact Factor