Article

Y-chromosome genotyping and genetic structure of Zhuang populations.

Department of Pathophysiology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China.
Acta Genetica Sinica 01/2007; 33(12):1060-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60143-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Zhuang, the largest ethnic minority population in China, is one of the descendant groups of the ancient Bai-Yue. Linguistically, Zhuang languages are grouped into northern and southern dialects. To characterize its genetic structure, 13 East Asian-specific Y-chromosome biallelic markers and 7 Y-chromosome short tandem repeat (STR) markers were used to infer the haplogroups of Zhuang populations. Our results showed that O*, O2a, and O1 are the predominant haplogroups in Zhuang. Frequency distribution and principal component analysis showed that Zhuang was closely related to groups of Bai-Yue origin and therefore was likely to be the descendant of Bai-Yue. The results of principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis contradicted the linguistically derived north-south division. Interestingly, a west-east clinal trend of haplotype frequency changes was observed, which was supported by AMOVA analysis that showed that between-population variance of east-west division was larger than that of north-south division. O* network suggested that the Hongshuihe branch was the center of Zhuang. Our study suggests that there are three major components in Zhuang. The O* and O2a constituted the original component; later, O1 was brought into Zhuang, especially eastern Zhuang; and finally, northern Han population brought O3 into the Zhuang populations.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
201 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The recent paper by Shi et al. (2008) provided the most details for the ethnic features of Y chromosome haplogroup D. The geographic distribution and age estimate for haplogroup D and its sub-clades helps in understanding the origin and migration processes of the early modern human in East Asia. Clades DE* and D* were found in Tibetan and Thai respectively. These findings make the search of the birth place of haplogroup D possible. Here we continued the discussion of Chandrasekar et al. (2007). The frequencies of haplogroup D in various populations of East Asia were collected from all the available literature. The analyses showed that the emergence of haplogroup D may be between India and Indochina. Clade D1 emerged subsequently when population move to the east. After clade D* diffused to the whole East Asia, it gave birth to clade D2 in Japan and clade D3 in Tibet independently.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Y chromosome evolves from an autochromosome and accumulates male-related genes including sex-determining region of Y-chromosome (SRY) and several spermatogenesis-related genes. The human Y chromosome (60 Mb long) is largely composed of repetitive sequences that give it a heterochromatic appearance, and it consists of pseudoautosomal, euchromatic, and heterochromatic regions. Located on the two extremities of the Y chromosome, pseudoautosomal regions 1 and 2 (PAR1 and PAR2, 2.6 Mb and 320 bp long, respectively) are homologs with the termini of the X chromosome. The euchromatic region and some of the repeat-rich heterochromatic parts of the Y chromosome are called "male-specific Y" (MSY), which occupy more than 95% of the whole Y chromosome. After evolution, the Y chromosome becomes the smallest in size with the least number of genes but with the most number of copies of genes that are mostly spermatogenesis-related. The Y chromosome is characterized by highly repetitive sequences (including direct repeats, inverted repeats, and palindromes) and high polymorphism. Several gene rearrangements on the Y chromosome occur during evolution owing to its specific gene structure. The consequences of such rearrangements are not only loss but also gain of specific genes. One hundred and fifty three haplotypes have been discovered in the human Y chromosome. The structure of the Y chromosome in the GenBank belongs to haplotype R1. There are 220 genes (104 coding genes, 111 pseudogenes, and 5 other uncategorized genes) according to the most recent count. The 104 coding genes encode a total of about 48 proteins/protein families (including putative proteins/protein families). Among them, 16 gene products have been discovered in the azoospermia factor region (AZF) and are related to spermatogenesis. It has been discovered that one subset of gene rearrangements on the Y chromosome, "micro-deletions", is a major cause of male infertility in some populations. However, controversies exist about different Y chromosome haplotypes. Six AZFs of the Y chromosome have been discovered including AZFa, AZFb, AZFc, and their combinations AZFbc, AZFabc, and partial AZFc called AZFc/gr/gr. Different deletions in AZF lead to different content spermatogenesis loss from teratozoospermia to infertility in different populations depending on their Y haplotypes. This article describes the structure of the human Y chromosome and investigates the causes of micro-deletions and their relationship with male infertility from the view of chromosome evolution. After analysis of the relationship between AZFc and male infertility, we concluded that spermatogenesis is controlled by a network of genes, which may locate on the Y chromosome, the autochromosomes, or even on the X chromosome. Further investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying male fertility/infertility will facilitate our knowledge of functional genomics.
    Journal of Genetics and Genomics 05/2008; 35(4):193-9. · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Linguistics and genetics always reach similar results in phylogenetic studies of human populations. A previous study found that populations speaking Han Chinese dialects have closer genetic relationships to each other than to neighboring ethnic groups. However, the Pinghua Chinese population from Guangxi is an exception. We have reported that northern Pinghua people are genetically related to populations speaking Daic languages. In this study, we further studied the southern Pinghua population. The Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA haplogroup components and network analysis indicated that northern and southern Pinghua populations were genetically different. Therefore, we concluded that the Pinghua speakers may have various origins, even though Pinghua dialects are similar. Pinghua dialects might have originated when the Daic or Hmongic speakers from different regions learnt to speak the same Chinese dialect hundreds of years ago. Speakers of one language do not always have just one origin. Spoken by one‐fifth of the world's populations, Chinese is one of the most ancient written languages in the world and has diverged into different dialects in the past few thousand years. Traditional Chinese dialect classification comprises seven groups, in which Pinghua is not included. With further linguistic study during the past 20 years, Chinese is now classified into 10 major dialects, Mandarin,, 2008). Most Pinghua speakers are Han Chinese; however, small sections of Guangxi indigenous ethnic groups such as Yao in Longsheng and Fuchuan counties are also taking Pinghua as their native language now (Liang & Zhang, 1999). There are various Chinese dialects in Guangxi, including Cantonese, Mandarin, Hakka, and Pinghua. Pinghua was the main language for communication among Han Chinese and southern ethnic groups in Guangxi before the arrival of the other Chinese dialects (Zhang, 1988). The history of Pinghua Chinese might be older than those of Hakka, Cantonese, or Min Chinese. Now, the population speaking Pinghua is around 3–4 million, mainly distributed in Guangxi, some also scattered in Hunan, Yunnan, and Guangdong. As one of the four dialects (Pinghua, Hakka, Mandarin, and Cantonese) in Guangxi, Pinghua is considered to be distinct from Hakka and Mandarin; however, the relation between Pinghua and Cantonese has always been a controversial subject in linguistics (Zhang & Liang, 1996). Some linguists insisted that Pinghua is different from Cantonese, therefore the two dialects are not closely related (Wei, 1996; Zhang, 1997; Liang & Zhang, 1999; Li, 2007). The Pinghua dialect is classified into the northern and southern subgroups, geographically divided by the city of Liuzhou (Yang et al., 1985). Some other linguists proposed to divide northern Pinghua and southern Pinghua according to the Cantonese influence on them (Wu, 2001; Xie, 2001; Qin, 2002). However, the characters of all the Pinghua dialects are apparent (Wang, 2001; Zhan et al., 2003). Our previous study on the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA diversity of northern Pinghua populations (Gan et al., 2008) indicated that Pinghua people were much closer to indigenous ethnic groups than to other Han Chinese. Pinghua populations are not descendants of Han migrants but of ethnic groups that have accepted the Han culture and language. The Pinghua dialect might have developed from an early Chinese dialect learnt by the Guangxi ethnic groups, while also under the influence of their mother language.
    Journal of Systematics and Evolution 03/2013; · 1.85 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
17 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014