Racial differences in tumor stage and survival for colorectal cancer in an insured population

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.9). 02/2007; 109(3):612-20. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22437
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite declining death rates from colorectal cancer (CRC), racial disparities have continued to increase. In this study, the authors examined disparities in a racially diverse group of insured patients.
This study was conducted among patients who were diagnosed with CRC from 1993 to 1998, when they were enrolled in integrated healthcare systems. Patients were identified from tumor registries and were linked to information in administrative databases. The sample was restricted to non-Hispanic whites (n = 10,585), non-Hispanic blacks (n = 1479), Hispanics (n = 985), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (n = 909). Differences in tumor stage and survival were analyzed by using polytomous and Cox regression models, respectively.
In multivariable regression analyses, blacks were more likely than whites to have distant or unstaged tumors. In Cox models that were adjusted for nonmutable factors, blacks had a higher risk of death from CRC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06-1.30). Hispanics had a risk of death similar to whites (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.18), whereas Asians/Pacific Islanders had a lower risk of death from CRC (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02). Adjustment for tumor stage decreased the HR to 1.11 for blacks, and the addition of receipt of surgical therapy to the model decreased the HR further to 1.06. The HR among Hispanics and Asians/Pacific Islanders was stable to adjustment for tumor stage and surgical therapy.
The relation between race and survival from CRC was complex and appeared to be related to differences in tumor stage and therapy received, even in insured populations. Targeted interventions to improve the use of effective screening and treatment among vulnerable populations may be needed to eliminate disparities in CRC.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States. There are significant differences in CRC incidence and mortality by race with the highest burden occurring among blacks. The underlying factors contributing to CRC disparities are multiple and complex. Studies have suggested that a higher prevalence of putative risk factors for CRC, limited access to healthcare services, lower utilization of healthcare resources and increased biological susceptibilities contribute to this disparity by race. This article reviews the factors associated with the disproportionally higher burden of CRC among blacks; addresses the controversies regarding the age to begin CRC screening and the screening modality to use for blacks; and proffers solutions to eliminate CRC disparity by race.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2014; 20(4):869-876. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.869 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For the management of thyroid diseases, there have been few studies aimed at examining the association between disparities and outcomes.
    09/2014; 140(12). DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1745
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes among different race ethnicities undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery. The nationwide inpatient sample was used to identify all thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy admissions from 2003 to 2009, using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes. Race, demographic, and clinical characteristics of patients were collected, along with surgeon volume, to predict the length of stay (LOS), complication rates, mortality, and total charges by racial group, using univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 106,314 thyroid and parathyroid surgeries were included in the current analysis. Of these patients, 54 % were Caucasian, 11 % African American, 7 % Hispanic, and 3 % Asian. Mean LOS was longer for African American patients (4 ± 8.7 days) than for Caucasians (2.3 ± 5.5 days) [p < 0.001]. African Americans had higher overall complications (16.8 %) compared with Caucasians (11 %), Hispanics (13.5 %), and Asians (12 %) [p < 0.001]. In-hospital mortality was higher for African Americans (0.8 %) compared with that from other race groups (0.3 %) [p < 0.001]. Mean total charges were significantly higher for African Americans ($33,292 ± $67,387) compared with those for Caucasians ($22,855 ± $40,167) (p < 0.001). African Americans had less access to intermediate- (10-99 cases) and high- (>100 cases) volume surgeons compared with Caucasians-45 versus 49 %, and 16 versus 19 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Higher surgeon volume was associated with improved outcomes (p < 0.001). Racial disparity in all investigated outcomes was still significantly evident even after stratification by surgeon volume. Higher surgeon volume is associated with improved patient outcomes. However, our data suggests that the observed racial disparities in thyroid and parathyroid surgery go beyond access to quality healthcare providers.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 03/2014; DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-3610-0 · 3.94 Impact Factor