Article

Ligand-specific dynamics of the androgen receptor at its response element in living cells

Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, Postboks 1041 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Molecular and Cellular Biology (Impact Factor: 5.04). 04/2007; 27(5):1823-43. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01297-06
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Androgens have key roles in normal physiology and in male sexual differentiation as well as in pathological conditions such as prostate cancer. Androgens act through the androgen receptor (AR), which is a ligand-modulated transcription factor. Antiandrogens block AR function and are widely used in disease states, but little is known about their mechanism of action in vivo. Here, we describe a rapid differential interaction of AR with target genomic sites in living cells in the presence of agonists which coincides with the recruitment of BRM ATPase complex and chromatin remodeling, resulting in transcriptional activation. In contrast, the interaction of antagonist-bound or mutant AR with its target was found to be kinetically different: it was dramatically faster, occurred without chromatin remodeling, and resulted in the lack of transcriptional inhibition. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer analysis of wild-type AR and a transcriptionally compromised mutant at the hormone response element showed that intramolecular interactions between the N and C termini of AR play a key functional role in vivo compared to intermolecular interactions between two neighboring ARs. These data provide a kinetic and mechanistic basis for regulation of gene expression by androgens and antiandrogens in living cells.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nagaich Akhilesh, Aug 23, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
104 Views
  • Source
    • "Methods such as FRAP, in vivo single-molecule analysis, and in vivo footprinting have been used to establish that indeed at least 90% of the molecules of each sequence specific DNA binding protein examined are bound to DNA in cells at any instant (Elf et al., 2007; Kao-Huang et al., 1977; Phair et al., 2004; Yang and Nash, 1995). The proteins exchange rapidly between the DNA bound and unbound state, with residence times on functional recognition sites within CCRs often being only a few or tens of seconds (Bosisio et al., 2006; Karpova et al., 2008; Klokk et al., 2007; Phair et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2006). When not bound to DNA, transcription factor molecules diffuse quickly within the nucleus, traversing one micron in less than a second (Elf et al., 2007; Phair et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To understand how transcription factors function, it is essential to determine the range of genes that they each bind and regulate in vivo. Here I review evidence that most animal transcription factors each bind to a majority of genes over a quantitative series of DNA occupancy levels. These continua span functional, quasifunctional, and nonfunctional DNA binding events. Factor regulatory specificities are distinguished by quantitative differences in DNA occupancy patterns. I contrast these results with models for transcription networks that define discrete sets of direct target and nontarget genes and consequently do not fully capture the complexity observed in vivo.
    Developmental Cell 10/2011; 21(4):611-26. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.008 · 10.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • " these data initiated discussion on the interpretation of many of the preceding FRAP experiments on nuclear receptors which suggested a much shorter binding time in the order of tens of seconds rather than minutes ( e . g . McNally et al . 2000 ; Farla et al . 2004 , 2005 ; Schaaf and Cidlowski 2003 ; Rayasam et al . 2005 ; Marcelli et al . 2006 ; Klokk et al . 2007 ; Meijsing et al . 2007 ) ."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fluorescent protein labelling, as well as impressive progress in live cell imaging have revolutionised the view on how essential nuclear functions like gene transcription regulation and DNA repair are organised. Here, we address questions like how DNA-interacting molecules find and bind their target sequences in the vast amount of DNA. In addition, we discuss methods that have been developed for quantitative analysis of data from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments (FRAP).
    Chromosome Research 01/2011; 19(1):83-98. DOI:10.1007/s10577-010-9172-5 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In addition to preventing androgen binding to the AR as an antagonist, it has been suggested that bicalutamide induces release of cytochrome C by Bax-dependent and -independent mechanisms resulting in apoptosis of LNCaP cells [40]. Furthermore, previous work from our laboratory suggests that AR antagonists, including bicalutamide, may function by affecting AR–chromatin interaction dynamics [50]. Further work is required to determine at what level bicalutamide and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway interact to bring about the added inhibitory effects on prostate cancer cells. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Androgen receptor (AR) and the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) signaling are two of the most important pathways implicated in prostate cancer. Previous work has shown that there is crosstalk between these two pathways; however, there are conflicting findings and the molecular mechanisms are not clear. Here we studied the AR-PI3K pathway crosstalk in prostate cancer cells in vitro as well as in vivo. Quantitative PCR, Western analysis, reporter assays, and proliferation analyses in vitro and in vivo were used to evaluate the effect of PI3K pathway inhibition on AR signaling and cell growth. Transcriptional activity of AR was increased when the PI3K pathway was inhibited at different levels. In the androgen responsive prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, androgen and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin synergistically activated androgen target genes. Despite increased androgen signaling, rapamycin treatment reduced LNCaP cell growth; the AR antagonist bicalutamide potentiated this effect. Furthermore, the rapamycin derivative CCI-779 reduced the growth of CWR22 prostate cancer xenografts while increasing AR target gene expression. These findings suggest that inhibition of the PI3K pathway activates AR signaling. Despite the increase in AR signaling which has proliferative effects, the result of PI3K pathway inhibition is antiproliferative. These findings suggest that the PI3K pathway is dominant over AR signaling in prostate cancer cells which should be considered in developing novel therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer.
    Cellular oncology: the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology 01/2010; 32(1-2):11-27. DOI:10.3233/CLO-2009-0487 · 4.17 Impact Factor
Show more