Article

Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: a review of the literature.

Division of Perinatology and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.52). 01/2007; 19(12):755-62. DOI: 10.1080/14767050600852601
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this review we give an overview of the methods and pitfalls in cervical length measurements. We compared the different techniques and investigated factors that influence visualization of the cervix. The data in this overview may be used to establish guidelines in clinical practice.

1 Bookmark
 · 
263 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the predictive value of cervical length as measured by transvaginal sonography (TVS) in supine and upright maternal positions for the mode of delivery and induction-to-delivery interval after induction of labor at term, and to compare these measurements with the Bishop score and its predictive value. TVS for cervical length measurement in the supine and upright positions and digital examination of the cervix were performed in 68 nulliparous and 34 parous women before induction of labor at term. In assessing the predictive value of the Bishop score and TVS parameters for a vaginal delivery after labor induction only nulliparous women were included in the analysis, since all the parous women delivered vaginally. Both nulliparous and parous women were included in the analysis of the induction-to-delivery interval. The method of labor induction, oxytocin or prostaglandin, was determined on the basis of the pre-induction Bishop score. Logistic regression analysis showed in nulliparous women that only the cervical length measured in the upright position was a significant predictor of the need for Cesarean section (odds ratio 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.27). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve in predicting the need for Cesarean section because of failure to progress were higher for the cervical length, both in supine and upright positions, than for the Bishop score (0.66, 0.68 and 0.46, respectively). Only the Bishop score correlated significantly with the induction-to-delivery interval in both nulliparous and parous women. However, this may have been due to a selection bias, as no significant correlation with Bishop score was found when the oxytocin and prostaglandin induction-to-delivery intervals were analyzed separately. Our results suggest that maternal postural change might improve the accuracy of sonographically-measured cervical length for predicting a vaginal delivery after induction of labor at term. However, our results need to be confirmed in a larger and more homogeneous population.
    Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 02/2009; 33(2):213-20. · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the reliability of, and patient satisfaction with, transperineal cervical length measurement during the third trimester of pregnancy and to compare these with measurement during the mid-trimester, using transvaginal sonographic imaging of the cervix as a reference. Women attending an outpatient clinic for cervical length measurement before 29 weeks or after 35 weeks of gestation were examined by transvaginal and transperineal ultrasound and the results compared. Preference for either method was indicated by both sonographers and patients. Seventy-one patients participated in the study, 23 in the second and 48 in the third trimester of pregnancy. There was failure to obtain a clear image on transperineal ultrasound in 30% of mid-trimester pregnancies, and in 19% of third-trimester cases. Elevation of the patient's hips improved the image in five out of 10 women in whom the scan was repeated following a postural change. Transvaginal cervical length measurements could be obtained in all cases. There was a strong correlation between transvaginal and transperineal measured cervical length (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.85). Sonographers preferred transvaginal images of the cervix irrespective of whether they were obtained in the second or third trimester. Transperineal ultrasound was judged as not or mildly painful by most women, but transvaginal ultrasound was preferred. Transvaginal ultrasound is the least painful, most feasible, and probably most accurate method with which to measure cervical length in the third trimester of pregnancy. Transperineal ultrasound is a feasible alternative, although its application in clinical practice is restricted by the need for an experienced sonographer.
    Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 10/2008; 32(5):657-62. · 3.56 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
121 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014