Article

Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: A review of the literature

Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.21). 01/2007; 19(12):755-62. DOI: 10.1080/14767050600852601
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this review we give an overview of the methods and pitfalls in cervical length measurements. We compared the different techniques and investigated factors that influence visualization of the cervix. The data in this overview may be used to establish guidelines in clinical practice.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Gerard H A Visser, Jun 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
369 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To determine if there is an association between cervical strain, evaluated using ultrasound elastography, and spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD) <37 weeks of gestation. Methods: One hundred and eighty nine (189) women at 16-24 weeks of gestation were evaluated. Ultrasound elastography was used to estimate cervical strain in three anatomical planes: one mid-sagittal in the same plane used for cervical length measurement, and two cross sectional images: one at the level of the internal cervical os, and the other at the level of the external cervical os. In each plane, two regions of interest (endocervix and entire cervix) were examined; a total of six regions of interest were evaluated. Results: The prevalence of sPTD was 11% (21/189). Strain values from each of the six cervical regions correlated weakly with cervical length (from r=-0.24, P<0.001 to r=-0.03, P=0.69). Strain measurements obtained in a cross sectional view of the internal cervical os were significantly associated with sPTD. Women with strain values ≤25th centile in the endocervical canal (0.19) and in the entire cervix (0.14) were 80% less likely to have a sPTD than women with strain values >25th centile [endocervical: odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.96; entire cervix: OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.9]. Additional adjustment for gestational age, race, smoking status, parity, maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and previous preterm delivery did not appreciably alter the magnitude or statistical significance of these associations. Strain values obtained from the external cervical os and from the sagittal view were not associated with sPTD. Conclusion: Low strain values in the internal cervical os were associated with a significantly lower risk of spontaneous preterm delivery <37 weeks of gestation.
    Journal of Perinatal Medicine 12/2013; 42(2):1-11. DOI:10.1515/jpm-2013-0277 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim was to evaluate the agreement between and the reproducibility of transperineal and transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurements performed by the duty obstetrical team in case of preterm labor. The acceptability of transperineal ultrasonography was also assessed. Pregnant patients between 25 and 34 weeks of gestation with contractions and a clinically modified cervix were included. Order of ultrasonography examination (transperineal or transvaginal first) and rank of operator (resident or senior) were allocated randomly. Agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman plot. The patient's discomfort and preference for either method were assessed with a questionnaire. 62 patients admitted for preterm labor between 25 and 34 weeks of gestation were included. Six seniors and nine residents took part in the study. Among the 51 patients with an interpretable transperineal ultrasound scan, median cervical length measurements with the transperineal and the transvaginal technique were, respectively, 25 mm (0-53) and 27 mm (4-51). Concordance was good with an ICC of 0.83 [IC 95 % = (0.73-0.90)]. Transperineal ultrasonography was preferred in 56.5 % of cases. In case of preterm labor, cervical length measurement with transperineal ultrasonography seems reproducible and can be performed by the obstetric team on duty.
    Archives of Gynecology 04/2014; 290(3). DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3229-1 · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cervical length measurement by transvaginal scanning (TVS) has been proposed by some as a universal screening test for preterm labour. The presence of prominent cervical mucous may affect assessment of the cervix; however, the exact technique to measure the cervix when there is prominent mucous or funnelling has not been described. We evaluated the level of agreement in cervical length measurements amongst Australian specialists and sonographers reporting on cervical assessment using an online survey. We conducted an online survey with 11 images of the cervix to assess how obstetric sonographers and sonologists report on the cervix when there is prominent mucous or funnelling. They were asked five questions about the image of the cervix. A kappa coefficient was calculated from the responses. We had 151 complete responses to the online survey. For the images which showed funnelling or prominent cervical mucous, there was little agreement regarding the cervix being open or closed and regards the location of the internal os. The Kappa coefficient was 0.22 indicating a low level of agreement for the location of the internal os. There is lack of agreement amongst Australian specialists and sonographers reporting on cervical assessment when there is prominent mucous or funnelling seen in the cervix. We propose a method to standardise reporting on the cervix incorporating the chorioamniotic membrane for the identification of the inner cervical os when there is prominent mucous or funnelling.
    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 02/2014; 54(2). DOI:10.1111/ajo.12173 · 1.62 Impact Factor