Prednisolone reduces recurrent wheezing after a first wheezing episode associated with rhinovirus infection or eczema

University of Turku, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.48). 04/2007; 119(3):570-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.11.003
Source: PubMed


Rhinovirus-induced early wheezing has been suggested as a new important risk factor for recurrent wheezing.
We sought to investigate the risk factors for recurrent wheezing and to determine post hoc the efficacy of prednisolone in risk groups.
We followed for 1 year 118 children (median age, 1.1 years) who had had their first episode of wheezing and had participated in a trial comparing prednisolone with placebo in hospitalized children. Demographics and laboratory data were obtained at study entry. The follow-up outcome was recurrent wheezing (3 physician-confirmed episodes).
Recurrent wheezing was diagnosed in 44 (37%) children. Independent risk factors were age < 1 year, atopy, and maternal asthma. The probability of recurrent wheezing was higher in rhinovirus than respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-affected children among placebo recipients (hazard ratio, 5.05; 95% CI, 1.00-25.41). Prednisolone decreased the probability of recurrent wheezing in children with eczema (0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.63) but not in those without eczema (1.89; 95% CI, 0.83-4.29; P = .007 for interaction). Prednisolone was associated with less recurrent wheezing in the rhinovirus group (0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.71), but not in the RSV (2.12; 95% CI, 0.46-9.76) or in the RSV/rhinovirus-negative groups (2.03; 95% CI, 0.83-5.00; P = .017 for interaction).
Rhinovirus-induced early wheezing is a major viral risk factor for recurrent wheezing. Prednisolone may prevent recurrent wheezing in rhinovirus-affected first-time wheezers. The presence of eczema may also influence the response to prednisolone.
A prospective trial is needed to test the hypothesis that prednisolone reduces recurrent wheezing in rhinovirus-affected wheezing children.

Download full-text


Available from: Pasi Lehtinen, Oct 04, 2015
1 Follower
47 Reads
  • Source
    • "However, the entry criterion for infants in our study was hospitalization for LRTI regardless of the presence of other risk factors for asthma, and only about a quarter of them had wheezing at hospitalisation. In contrast, previous studies in developed countries were conducted among children already at increased risk of asthma, since they either had presence of wheezing during LRTI [20–22] or parental history of asthma or respiratory allergies [23–26]. Information on family risk factors for asthma was not available in our study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although association between respiratory syncytial virus infection and later asthma development has been established, little is known about the role of other respiratory viruses. Rhinovirus was considered a mild pathogen of the upper respiratory tract but current evidence suggests that rhinovirus is highly prevalent among children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether LRTI hospitalization associated with rhinovirus during infancy was associated with an increased risk of wheezing - a proxy measure of asthma - during childhood. During a 12 months period, all infants <1 year admitted to Manhiça District Hospital with symptoms of LRTI who survived the LRTI episode, were enrolled in the study cohort. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected on admission for viral determination and study infants were classified according to presence or not of rhinovirus. The study cohort was passively followed-up at the Manhiça District Hospital for up to 4 years and 9 months to evaluate the association between LRTI associated with rhinovirus in infancy and wheezing during childhood. A total of 220 infants entered the cohort; 25% of them had rhinovirus detected during the LRTI episode as opposed to 75% who tested negative for rhinovirus. After adjusting for sex and age and HIV infection at recruitment, infants hospitalized with LRTI associated with rhinovirus had higher incidence of subsequent visits with wheezing within the year following hospitalization [Rate ratio=1.68, (95% confidence interval=1.02-2.75); Wald test p-value = 0.039]. No evidence of increased incidence rate of visits with wheezing was observed for the remaining follow-up period. Our data suggest a short term increased risk of wheezing after an initial episode of LRTI with RV.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e69370. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069370 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "For example, TTV and AdV infections are associated with a chronic inflammatory state of the lungs [15] [170] [171] [172] [173]. In children, there is a link between susceptibility to HRVinduced wheezing and the development of asthma [174] [175] [176] [177] [178], and in adults, HRV is the most important trigger of exacerbations of COPD [91] [95]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnostics of respiratory viral infections has improved markedly during the last 15 years with the development of PCR techniques. Since 1997, several new respiratory viruses and their subgroups have been discovered: influenza A viruses H5N1 and H1N1, human metapneumovirus, coronaviruses SARS, NL63 and HKU1, human bocavirus, human rhinoviruses C and D and potential respiratory pathogens, the KI and WU polyomaviruses and the torque teno virus. The detection of previously known viruses has also improved. Currently, a viral cause of respiratory illness is almost exclusively identifiable in children, but in the elderly, the detection rates of a viral etiology are below 40%, and this holds also true for exacerbations of chronic respiratory illnesses. The new viruses cause respiratory symptoms like the common cold, cough, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. Acute respiratory failure may occur. These viruses are distributed throughout the globe and affect people of all ages. Data regarding these viruses and the elderly are scarce. This review introduces these new viruses and reviews their clinical significance, especially with regard to the elderly population.
    The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal 07/2011; 5(1):61-9. DOI:10.2174/1874306401105010061
  • Source
    • "We based our study definition of recurrent wheezing, 1 or more dispensings of a short acting beta agonist in the previous 12 months and the absence of an asthma diagnosis, on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended definition of 1 episode of asthma or wheezing in the previous 12 months. By definition, recurrent wheezing requires multiple episodes of wheezing and frequently in the medical literature a definition of 3 or more episodes is applied over a period of 6–12 months [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 2007 US approval for use of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children aged 24-59 months included precautions against use in (1) children <24 months and children aged 24-59 months with (2) asthma, (3) recurrent wheezing, and (4) altered immunocompetence. A postmarketing commitment was initiated to monitor LAIV use and the frequency of select safety outcomes in these cohorts. Vaccination rates and the frequency of hospitalizations or emergency department visits within 42 days after LAIV and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) administration were estimated from 2007 to 2009 claims data from a health insurance database. Rates of LAIV use per 10,000 child-days among cohorts 1, 2, and 4 were low relative to rates among the LAIV-recommended population (2007-2008; 0.03-0.78 vs. 1.32, 2008-2009; 0.08-3.26 vs. 5.94). However, rates of LAIV use per 10,000 child-days in cohort 3 were similar to rates among the LAIV-recommended population (2007-2008; 1.55 vs. 1.32, 2008-2009; 5.01 vs. 5.94). The rate of emergency department visits/hospitalizations within 42 days of vaccination with LAIV was the same as or less than the rate within 42 days of vaccination with TIV. Less restricted LAIV use in children with past wheezing may be related to the broad definition of recurrent wheezing used in national guidelines and the current study. In the small number of nonrecommended children receiving LAIV, no safety signals were identified.
    Vaccine 05/2011; 29(31):4947-52. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.113 · 3.62 Impact Factor
Show more