Article

Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.

Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21215, USA.
The Journal of Arthroplasty (Impact Factor: 2.11). 02/2007; 22(1):100-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients with standard total hip arthroplasties may have reduced hip abduction and extension moments when compared with normal nonosteoarthritic hips. In comparison, patients after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty appear to have a near-normal gait. The authors evaluated temporal-spatial parameters, hip kinematics, and kinetics in hip resurfacing patients compared with patients with unilateral osteoarthritic hips and unilateral standard total hip arthroplasties. Patients with resurfacing walked faster (average 1.26 m/s) and were comparable with normals. There were no significant differences in hip abductor and extensor moments of patients with resurfacing compared with patients in the standard hip arthroplasty group. This study showed more normal hip kinematics and functionality in resurfacing hip arthroplasty, which may be due to the large femoral head.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
110 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resurfacing (RA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are options in the treatment of debilitating hip pathology. 381 patients that had undergone arthroplasty with a BHR RA, ASR RA, metal-on-metal (MoM) THA or ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA were reviewed for satisfaction, function, health and survivorship at a median follow up of 50months. Significantly lower survivorship for revision and reoperation was observed in the ASR group. The BHR and CoC demonstrated better outcome scores than the ASR (OHS and SAPS) and the BHR better scores than the MoM (OHS and SF12 PCS). In the short to medium term, survivorship and outcomes for the best performing RA (BHR) and THA (CoC) were comparable. There was a non-significant trend towards poorer outcome scores in the MoM THA group.
    The Journal of arthroplasty 03/2013; · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip arthroplasty is a successful surgical treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Different questionnaires are used by the clinicians to assess functional capacity and the patient's pain, despite these questionnaires are known to be subjective. Furthermore, many studies agree that kinematic and kinetic parameters are crucial to evaluate and to provide useful information about the patient's evolution for clinicians and rehabilitation specialists. However, these quantities can currently only be obtained in a fully equipped gait laboratory. Instrumented shoes can quantify gait velocity, kinetic, kinematic and symmetry parameters. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the instrumented shoes is a sufficiently sensitive instrument to show differences in mobility performance before and after total hip arthroplasty. In this study, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were measured before and 6-8 months after total hip arthroplasty. Both measurement sessions include 2 functional mobility tasks while the subject was wearing instrumented shoes. Before each measurement the Harris Hip Score and the Traditional Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index were administered as well. The stance time and the average vertical ground reaction force measured with the instrumented shoes during walking, and their symmetry index, showed significant differences before and after total hip arthroplasty. However, the data obtained with the sit to stand test did not reveal this improvement after surgery. Our results show that inter-limb asymmetry during a walking activity can be evaluated with the instrumented shoes before and after total hip arthroplasty in an outpatient clinical setting.
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 02/2014; 11(1):20. · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gait adaptations are persistent after total hip arthroplasty and can depend on the type of surgery. This study focused on two surgical approaches: anterior and lateral. To analyze gait adaptations, biomechanical analyses usually employ an a priori selection of the parameters that leads to incomplete or redundant information. In contrast, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) provides an efficient transformation of the dataset by automatically identifying the major sources of variability. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in level-walking among three groups of participants using PCA: patients undergoing an anterior surgical approach, patients undergoing a lateral surgical approach, and healthy controls. Biomechanical descriptions of the extracted principal components aided in the interpretation of the statistically significant results obtained from multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) tests. A point system was introduced to summarize the results and guide the interpretation. PCA captured reduced magnitude in sagittal and frontal moments in the anterior approach group, and reduced sagittal peaks angle in the lateral group, as previously found with traditional analyses. PCA also identified significant pattern delays in the anterior group, unnoticed in previous studies. In conclusion, neither surgical approach restored normal gait functionality because lower extremity kinetics and kinematics alterations persisted at 300-day follow-up after the surgery, regardless of the technique.
    Journal of biomechanics 07/2012; 45(12):2109-15. · 2.66 Impact Factor