Article

Identifying children with autism early?

Division of General Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 02/2007; 119(1):152-3. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-2026
Source: PubMed
0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: •We explore current findings related to maternal cradling bias.•Cradling bias crosses cultures, and is not correlated with handedness, hemispheric lateralization, and other factors.•We explore the relationship of maternal cradling bias to later infant social and language development.
    Infant Behavior and Development 09/2014; 37(4):722-728. DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.08.008 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Participants were queried regarding attitudes, social norms, and barriers to developmental screening. Using information from the focus groups, workflow strategies were developed for implementing screening. Referral rates and satisfaction with screening were gathered at the conclusion. Six focus groups of parents and clinicians were conducted. Major themes identified included 1) parents desired greater input on child development and increased time with physicians, 2) physicians did not fully trust parental input, 3) physicians preferred clinical acumen over screening tools, and 4) physicians lacked time and training to conduct screening. For the intervention, developmental screening was implemented at the 9-, 18-, 24-, and 30-month well visits using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-II and the Modified Checklist for Toddlers. 1397 (98% of eligible) children under 36 months old were enrolled, and 1184 (84%) were screened at least once. 1002 parents (85%) completed a survey at the conclusion of the screening trial. Most parents reported no difficulty completing the screens (99%), felt the screens covered important areas of child development (98%), and felt they learned about their child's strengths and limitations (88%). Developmental screening in urban low-income practices is feasible and acceptable, but requires strategies to capture parental input, provide training, facilitate referrals, and develop workflow procedures and electronic decision support.
    BMC Pediatrics 01/2014; 14(1):16. DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-14-16 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explored North Carolina pediatric healthcare professional's (PHP) perceptions of screening 12-18 month old infants for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Eight focus groups (66 PHPs) were conducted across practice settings. The purpose was to explore PHP's perspectives to: inform development of ASD screening tools and ultimately impact their use in PHP settings. PHPs reported concerns, barriers, and the need for research to support early ASD screening. Additionally, they expressed the need for: (a) clear "red flags" of ASD for 12-18 month olds; (b) socioculturally sensitive and effective screening tools; (c) effective early interventions; (d) systems to handle potential increases in referrals; and (e) continuing education. PHPs also demonstrated preferences about screening tool characteristics and processes for enhancing screening efforts.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 09/2014; 44:2311-2328. DOI:10.1007/s10803-014-2101-2 · 3.06 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads