Adolescent Depression Screening in Primary Care: Feasibility and Acceptability
ABSTRACT Despite available depression treatments, only one fourth to one third of depressed adolescents are receiving care. The problem of underdiagnosis and underreferral might be redressed if assessment of suicidality and depression became a more formal part of routine pediatric care. Our purpose for this study was to explore the feasibility and acceptability of implementing adolescent depression screening into clinical practice.
In this study we implemented a 2-stage adolescent identification protocol, a first-stage pen-and-paper screen and a second-stage computerized assessment, into a busy primary care pediatric practice. Providers tracked the number of eligible patients screened at both health maintenance and urgent care visits and provided survey responses regarding the burden that screening placed on the practice and the effect on patient/parent-provider relationships.
Seventy-nine percent of adolescent patients presenting for health maintenance visits were screened, as were the majority of patients presenting for any type of visit. The average completion time for the paper screen was 4.6 minutes. Providers perceived parents and patients as expressing more satisfaction than dissatisfaction with the screening procedures and that the increased time burden could be handled. All providers wished to continue using the paper screen at the conclusion of the protocol.
Instituting universal systematic depression screening in a practice with a standardized screening instrument met with little resistance by patients and parents and was well perceived and accepted by providers.
- SourceAvailable from: Maria Laura Bertolaccini
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "In addition, at least one neuropsychiatric manifestation was identified in 91% of the SLE patients and in 54% of the controls, with a 9.5 fold increase in risk, a specificity of 0.46 and a detection rate of 91% among SLE patients. Headache, anxiety, mild depression, mild cognitive impairment and polyneuropathy are common in otherwise healthy subjects and even more so among patients with a chronic disease  , making the attribution of such symptoms to SLE itself a challenge in those settings. Taking into account the high prevalence of some NP manifestations in both SLE and control groups, they set up a different model excluding headache, anxiety, mild depression, mild cognitive impairment and polyneuropathy without electrophysiological confirmation. "
ABSTRACT: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Clinical manifestations can involve both the central and peripheral nervous systems, and they must be differentiated from infections, metabolic complications, and drug-induced toxicity. Recognition and treatment of CNS involvement continues to represent a major diagnostic challenge. In this Review, we sought to summarise the current insights on the various aspects of neuropsychiatric SLE with special emphasis on the terminology and classification criteria needed to correctly attribute the particular event to SLE.Autoimmunity reviews 08/2012; 12(3). DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.08.014 · 7.10 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "At the same time, obtaining reimbursement for these services remains a very real barrier to implementation by psychologists (Noll & Fischer, 2004). Third, there are often attitudinal barriers among physicians and other health care providers to instituting psychosocial screening for children with a chronic illness (Varni, Burwinkle, & Lane, 2005; Zuckerbrot et al., 2007). There may be reluctance to screen because of the presumed stigma associated with receiving psychological services. "
ABSTRACT: Psychosocial factors are strongly associated with long-term medical and mental health outcomes for children with Type 1 diabetes. As a result, current national and international guidelines now call for psychosocial screening at or near the time of diabetes diagnosis. Despite this recommendation, there are no published protocols to provide guidance to psychologists attempting to screen and identify at-risk patients and their families and prevent the emergence of secondary psychological and medical complications. In this article, the authors describe a model psychosocial screening program that was designed to minimize barriers to implementation and that can potentially be adapted for use by psychologists in different settings. Preliminary findings from the pilot phase of program development suggest that the screening is effective at identifying patients at risk for subsequent problems with diabetes management. The screening was able to identify specific, modifiable risk factors that provide targets for efforts at preventive intervention using treatment approaches familiar to most psychologists. The authors conclude with a discussion of the importance of screening and knowledge of diabetes risk factors for psychologists working in different treatment settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)Professional Psychology Research and Practice 07/2011; 42(4):324-330. DOI:10.1037/a0023836 · 1.34 Impact Factor
Pediatric nursing 01/2010; 36(2):103-11.
- "Although the HEADSS screening tool is a commonly used interview technique by primary care providers, little information regarding testing of reliability and validity of the tool exists. Zuckerbrot et al. (2007) recommend the use of psychometrically reliable and practical methods, such as brief symptom checklists or validated depression scale, over the HEADSS screening tool. If a high-risk area is identified during the HEADSS assessment, further evaluation should take place (Reif & Warford, 2006). "