Timing of resection of liver metastases synchronous to colorectal tumor: proposal of prognosis-based decisional model.

Unit of Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Strada Provinciale 142 km 3,95 10060, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 04/2007; 14(3):1143-50. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9284-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Timing of hepatectomy for synchronous metastases of colorectal cancer is still debated. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors after synchronous and delayed liver resections to define selection criteria for choosing timing of hepatectomy.
The study was performed on 127 patients with synchronous metastases undergoing radical hepatectomy. We divided patients according to the timing of hepatectomy: 70 synchronous (group A) and 57 delayed (group B).
Overall survival was similar between the two groups (5-year survival 30.8% vs. 32.0% A vs. B, P = .406). The multivariate analysis evidenced four independent prognostic factors in group A: male sex (P = .04), T4 (P = .0035), more than three metastases (P = .0001), and metastatic infiltration of nearby structures (P < .0001). There were no statistically significant prognostic factors in group B. Patients with more than three metastases had a significantly worse survival in group A than in group B (3-year survival, 15.0% vs. 34.3%, P = .007); similarly, borderline significant difference was encountered in patients with T4 primary tumor (3-year survival, 16.7% vs. 60%, P = .064)
Patients with liver metastases synchronous with colorectal cancer with T4 primary tumor, metastasis infiltration of neighboring structures, and especially with more than three metastases should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It remains unclear whether primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SLMs) should be resected simultaneously or with a staged procedure. We reviewed the short-term outcomes of 127 patients who underwent simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and SLM at our institution from January 1993 to December 2011. The proportion of simultaneous resections was 84.7% (127 of 150 patients). There was no postoperative mortality, and the postoperative complication rate was 61.4%. Major complications occurred in 23 (18.2%) patients, and anastomotic failure occurred in 2 (1.6%). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 74%, 64%, and 52%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival period was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-9.5 months) and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 17%. Simultaneous resection can be performed safely in patients with colorectal cancer and SLM.
    Surgery 10/2013; · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The optimal management of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases has not yet been elucidated. The aim of the present study was systematically to review current evidence concerning the timing and sequence of surgical interventions: colon first, liver first or simultaneous.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed of clinical studies comparing the timing and sequence of surgical interventions in patients with synchronous liver metastases. Retrospective studies were included but case reports and small case series were excluded. Preoperative and intraoperative data, length of hospital stay, perioperative mortality and morbidity, and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were compared. The studies were evaluated according to a modification of the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria.ResultsEighteen papers were included and 21 entries analysed. Five entries favoured the simultaneous approach regarding duration of procedure, whereas three showed no difference; five entries favoured simultaneous treatment in terms of blood loss, whereas in four there was no difference; and all studies comparing length of hospital stay favoured the simultaneous approach. Five studies favoured the simultaneous approach in terms of morbidity and eight found no difference, and no study demonstrated a difference in perioperative mortality. One study suggested a better 5-year survival rate after staged procedures, and another suggested worse 1-year but better 3- and 5-year survival rates following the simultaneous approach. The median MINORS score was 10, with incomplete follow-up and outcome reporting accounting primarily for low scores.Conclusion None of the three surgical strategies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases appeared inferior to the others.
    British Journal of Surgery 03/2014; · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The optimal timing of resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases is still controversial. Retrospective cohort studies always had baseline imbalances in comparing simultaneous resection with staged strategy. Significantly more patients with mild conditions received simultaneous resections. Previous published meta-analyses based on these studies did not correct these biases, resulting in low reliability. Our meta-analysis was conducted to compensate for this deficiency and find candidates for each surgical strategy.
    PLoS ONE 08/2014; 9(8):e104348. · 3.53 Impact Factor