Gastric residual volume (GRV) and gastric contents measurement by refractometry
ABSTRACT Traditional use of gastric residual volumes (GRVs), obtained by aspiration from a nasogastric tube, is inaccurate and cannot differentiate components of the gastric contents (gastric secretion vs delivered formula). The use of refractometry and 3 mathematical equations has been proposed as a method to calculate the formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume. In this paper, we have validated these mathematical equations so that they can be implemented in clinical practice.
Each of 16 patients receiving a nasogastric tube had 50 mL of water followed by 100 mL of dietary formula (Osmolite HN, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH) infused into the stomach. After mixing, gastric content was aspirated for the first Brix value (BV) measurement by refractometry. Then, 50 mL of water was infused into the stomach and a second BV was measured. The procedure of infusion of dietary formula (100 mL) and then water (50 mL) was repeated and followed by subsequent BV measurement. The same procedure was performed in an in vitro experiment. Formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume were calculated from the derived mathematical equations.
The formula concentrations, GRVs, and formula volumes calculated by using refractometry and the mathematical equations were close to the true values obtained from both in vivo and in vitro validation experiments.
Using this method, measurement of the BV of gastric contents is simple, reproducible, and inexpensive. Refractometry and the derived mathematical equations may be used to measure formula concentration, GRV, and formula volume, and also to serve as a tool for monitoring the gastric contents of patients receiving nasogastric feeding.
- SourceAvailable from: Emma J Ridley[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The provision of early nutrition therapy to critically ill patients is established as the standard of care in most intensive care units around the world. Despite the known benefits, tolerance of enteral nutrition in the critically ill varies and delivery is often interrupted. Observational research has demonstrated that clinicians deliver little more than half of the enteral nutrition they plan to provide. The main clinical tool for assessing gastric tolerance is gastric residual volume; however, its usefulness in this setting is debated. There are several strategies employed to improve the tolerance and hence adequacy of enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill. One of the most widely used strategies is that of prokinetic drug administration, most commonly metoclopramide and erythromycin. Although there are new agents being investigated, none are ready for routine application in the critically ill and the benefits are still being established. This review investigates current practice and considers the literature on assessment of enteral tolerance and optimization of enteral nutrition in the critically ill.Nutrition 02/2011; 27(5):509-12. DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2010.10.010 · 3.05 Impact Factor
Conference Paper: High power four-way power divider/combiner[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A four-way waveguide power divider/combiner has been developed using a radial waveguide. The divider has an insertion loss of less than 0.5 dB and a power balance of ±0.2 dB over a bandwidth of 2.5 GHz at X -band. A power combiner using this circuit and four Gunn oscillators has been demonstrated with over 70% combining efficiency. The circuit should have applications in millimeter-wave power combining and high-power microwave systemsMicrowave Symposium Digest, 1990., IEEE MTT-S International; 06/1990
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Enteral nutrition has been shown to have clinical advantages over parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients. However, delivery of enteral nutrition can be challenging because of intolerance and potential adverse effects. Gastric feeding is more physiologic than post-pyloric feeding, but its use may be limited by intolerance due to gastric dysfunction and by inappropriately low gastric residual volumes. Post-pyloric feeding may help to overcome these disadvantages by making it possible to avoid feeding interruption and potentially reduce the risk of aspiration. Results from studies to date have not shown any advantage of post-pyloric over gastric feeding in regard to outcome. This article focuses on strategies for enteral nutrition delivery in critically ill patients. The selection of site for enteral feeding should be based on risks, patient tolerance, and availability of local expertise. Predetermined feeding protocols may help to optimize the delivery of enteral nutrition. Only sufficient and safe delivery of enteral nutrition will have a positive impact on patient outcome.Current Gastroenterology Reports 09/2007; 9(4):309-16. DOI:10.1007/s11894-007-0035-y