Brief Report: Testing the Factorial Invariance of the CBCL Somatic Complaints Scale as a Measure of Internalizing Symptoms for Children with and without Chronic Illness

Bradley/Hasbro Children's Research Center, Brown University Medical School, The CORO Building, Suite 204, One Hoppin Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.91). 07/2007; 32(5):512-6. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl051
Source: PubMed


To examine the factorial invariance of the Somatic Complaints subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of Internalizing Behavior Problems across a sample of children with and without spina bifida.
Multisample confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare mother and father report on the Somatic Complaints subscale across a sample of children with spina bifida and a matched comparison sample of able-bodied children ages 8 through 11 years (N = 68 for mother report in each group; N = 54 for father report in the spina bifida group and 53 for the able-bodied group).
Although there were no significant between-group differences in the magnitude of factor loadings, significantly more variance in scores on the Somatic Complaints scale was unrelated to Internalizing Behavior Problems for the spina bifida group, compared to the able-bodied group. There were no between-group differences when father data were analyzed, but the latent variable of Internalizing Behavior Problems explained little variance in the Somatic Complaints scale for either group.
Maternal report of Somatic Complaints on the CBCL does not appear to measure Internalizing Behavior Problems in the same manner across groups of children with and without spina bifida. This suggests that the Somatic Complaints subscale should be interpreted with caution when measuring Internalizing Behavior Problems within this population.

Download full-text


Available from: Fred B. Bryant, Sep 24, 2014

  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics 03/2008; 29(1):51-4. DOI:10.1097/DBP.0b013e31815f250c · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with brain tumors are at risk for psychological and behavioral difficulties. This study examined the ability of parent report of attention problems, withdrawal, anxiety, and depression, as well as IQ, to predict later adaptive functioning in 42 children treated for brain tumors. Age at diagnosis, SES, gender, and scores on the Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) also were examined as predictors. Parent report of attention problems, SES, and NPS were significant predictors of later adaptive functioning across domains. This finding highlights the ability of parent report of attention problems to predict later adaptive functioning in children treated for brain tumors.
    Child Neuropsychology 06/2008; 15(1):40-52. DOI:10.1080/09297040802036102 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The factorial validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scales used to measure social-cognitive correlates of physical activity among adolescent girls were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to questionnaire responses obtained from a multi-ethnic sample (N = 4885) of middle-school girls from six regions of the United States. A cohort of 1893 girls completed the scales in both sixth and eighth grades, allowing longitudinal analysis. Theoretically and statistically sound models were developed for each scale, supporting the factorial validity of the scales in all groups. Multi-group and longitudinal invariance was confirmed across race/ethnicity groups, age within grade, BMI categories, and the 2-year period between grades. The scores from the scales provide valid assessments of social-cognitive variables that are putative mediators or moderators of change in physical activity. The revised scales can be used in observational studies of change or interventions designed to increase physical activity among girls during early adolescence.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 06/2009; 35(1):72-88. DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp031 · 2.91 Impact Factor
Show more