Continued decline of the threatened Eastern Scotian Shelf Atlantic cod population: How important is grey seal predation

Population Ecology Division, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada.
Ecological Applications (Impact Factor: 4.09). 01/2007; 16(6):2276-92. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2276:CDOAAC]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed


The continental shelf ecosystem on the Eastern Scotian Shelf (ESS) has experienced drastic changes. Once common top predators are a small fraction of their historical abundance, and much of the current community structure is now dominated by pelagic fishes and invertebrates. Embedded within this food web, Atlantic cod and gray seal populations have recently exhibited nearly opposite trends. Since 1984, cod populations have decreased exponentially at a rate averaging 17% per year, whereas gray seals have continued to increase exponentially at a rate of 12%. We reexamined the impact of gray seals on Atlantic cod dynamics using more than 30 years of data on the population trends of cod and gray seals while incorporating new information on seal diet and seasonal distribution. The closure of the cod fishery over 10 years ago allowed for a better estimation of natural mortality rates. We quantified the impact of seals on ESS cod by (1) estimating trends in seal and cod abundance, (2) estimating the total energy needed for seal growth and maintenance from an energetics model, (3) using estimates of the percentage of cod in the total diet derived from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) and of the size-specific selectivity of cod consumed (derived from otoliths collected from fecal samples), and (4) assuming a gray seal functional response. Uncertainties of the model estimates were calculated using the Hessian approximation of the variance-covariance matrix. Between 1993 and 2000, cod comprised, on average, < 5% of a gray seal's diet. Our model shows that, since the closure of the fishery, gray seals have imposed a significant level of instantaneous mortality (0.21), and along with other unknown sources of natural mortality (0.62), are contributing to the failure of this cod stock to recover.

Download full-text


Available from: William Don Bowen, Jan 16, 2015
  • Source
    • "This would theoretically result in a depensatory PR that would accelerate the decline and even inhibit recovery , particu - larly if a 2 - state system is realized ( Fu , Mohn & Fanning 2001 ; Frank et al . 2005 ; Trzcinski , Mohn & Bowen 2006 ) . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. A robust test of ecological theory is to gauge the predictive accuracy of general relationships parameterized from multiple systems but applied to a new area. To address this goal, we used an ecosystem-level experiment to test predator-prey theory by manipulating prey abundance to determine whether predation was density dependent, density independent, compensatory, or depensatory (inversely density dependent) on prey populations. 2. Understanding the nature of predation is of primary importance in community ecology because it establishes whether predation has little effect on prey abundance (compensatory), whether it promotes coexistence (density dependent), reduces the equilibrium of prey (density independent), or whether it can be destabilizing (depensatory). 3. We used theoretical predictions consisting of functional and numerical equations parameterized independently from meta-analyses on wolves (Canis lupus) and moose (Alces alces), but applied to our specific wolf-moose system. Predictions were tested by experimentally reducing moose abundance across 6500 km2 as a novel way of evaluating the nature of predation. 4. Depensatory predation of wolves on moose was the best explanation of the population dynamic – a mechanism that has been hypothesized to occur but has rarely been evaluated. Adding locally obtained kill rates and numerical estimates to the independent data provided no benefit to model predictions, suggesting that the theory was robust to local variation. 5. These findings have critical implications for any organism that is preyed upon but that also has, or will be, subject to increased human exploitation or perturbations from environmental change. If depensatory predation is not accounted for in harvest models, predicted yields will be excessive and lead to further population decline.
    Journal of Animal Ecology 06/2015; DOI:10.1111/1365-2656.12413 · 4.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although food web and multispecies models have demonstrated that apex predators such as marine mammals do not constitute a major energy pathway in this ecosystem relative to other trophic levels (Read and Brownstein 2003, Link et al. 2006), prey-specific removals by marine mammals can be substantial (Trites et al. 1997, Overholtz and Link 2007, NEFSC 2012). There are estimates for marine mammal consumption in the NEUS region (e.g., Kenney et al. 1997, Link et al. 2006, Overholtz and Link 2007) and in contiguous northwest Atlantic ecosystems (Hammill and Stenson 2000, Trzcinski et al. 2006, Bundy et al. 2009). However, these estimates span multiple orders of magnitude because of differing methodologies, different time periods, and inconsistent assumptions. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The economic and ecological impacts of fish consumption by marine mammals, the associated interactions with commercial fish stocks, and the forage demands of these marine mammal populations are largely unknown. Consumption estimates are often either data deficient or not fully evaluated in a rigorous, quantitative manner. Although consumption estimates exist for the Northeast United States (NEUS) Large Marine Ecosystem, there is considerable uncertainty in those estimates. We examined consumption estimates for 12 marine mammal species inhabiting the regional ecosystem. We used sensitivity analyses to examine metabolically driven daily individual consumption rates, resulting in a suite of feasible parameter-pair ranges for each of three taxonomic groups: mysticetes, odontocetes, and pinnipeds. We expanded daily individual consumption to annual consumption based on abundance estimates of marine mammals found on the NEUS continental shelf coupled with estimates of annual residence time for each species. To examine consumptive removals for specific prey, diet compositions were summarized into major prey categories, and predatory removals by marine mammal species as well as for total marine mammal consumption were estimated for each prey taxa. Bounds on consumption estimates for each marine mammal species were determined using Monte Carlo resampling simulations. Our results suggest that consumption for these 12 marine mammal species combined may be similar in magnitude to commercial fishery landings for small pelagic and groundfish prey groups. Consumption by marine mammals warrants consideration both as a source of mortality in assessments of prey stocks, and to determine marine mammal forage demands in ecosystem assessment models. The approach that we present represents a rigorous, quantitative method to scope the bounds of the biomass that marine mammals are expected to consume, and is appropriate for use in other ecosystems where the interaction between marine mammals and commercial fisheries is thought to be prominent.
    Ecological Applications 03/2015; 25(2):373-389. DOI:10.1890/13-1656.1 · 4.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Estimating the diets of marine mammals is needed to understand how individuals and populations respond to ecological and environmental variability and their functional roles in marine ecosystems (Bowen 1997). An understanding of diet is also of practical importance in marine mammal conservation (Parrish et al. 2002) and to evaluate the contribution of marine mammal predation to sources of natural mortality in prey populations, some of which may be commercially fished or of conservation concern (e.g., Trzcinski et al. 2006). In many terrestrial and avian predators, the species composition of diets can be estimated from direct observation of feeding or provisioning, although indirect methods are also used (Pierce and Boyle 1991). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diet estimation in marine mammals relies on indirect methods including recovery of prey hard parts from stomachs and feces, quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA), stable isotope mixing models, and identification of prey DNA in stomach contents and feces. Experimental evidence (9 species/13 studies) shows that digestion strongly influences the proportion and size of otoliths that can be recovered in feces. Number correction factors (NCF) and digestion coefficients have been experimentally determined to reduce the biases in fecal analysis. Correction factors and coefficients have not been determined for diet estimated from stomach contents. QFASA estimates which prey species and amounts must have been eaten to account for the fatty acid composition of the predator. Experimental studies on mammals and seabirds (9 species/10 studies) indicate that accurate estimates of diet can be determined using QFASA. Stable isotope mixing models provide rather coarse taxonomic resolution of diet composition. Prey DNA analysis shows promise as a method to estimate the species composition of diet, but further development and testing is needed to validate its use. Obtaining a representative sample from marine mammal populations is a significant challenge. Therefore, the use of complementary methods is recommended to obtain the most informative results.
    Marine Mammal Science 10/2013; 29(4). DOI:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2012.00604.x · 1.94 Impact Factor
Show more