Article

Estimation of the Period Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Nine Health Plans Using Computerized Diagnoses and Outpatient Pharmacy Dispensings

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (Impact Factor: 5.48). 01/2007; 13(4):451-61. DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There are few contemporary estimates of prevalence rates for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in diverse North American communities.
We estimated the period prevalence of IBD for January 1, 1999, through June 30, 2001, among 1.8 million randomly sampled members of nine integrated healthcare organizations in the US using computerized diagnoses and outpatient pharmaceutical dispensing. We also assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivities of 1) the case-finding algorithm, and 2) the 30-month sampling period using medical chart review and linkage to a 78-month dataset, respectively.
The PPV of the case-finding algorithm was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78-87) and 84% (95% CI, 79-89) in two different organizations. In both, the sensitivity of the optimal algorithm, compared with the most inclusive, exceeded 90%. The sensitivity of the 30-month sampling period compared with 78 months was 61% (95% CI, 57-64) in one organization. Applying a slightly more sensitive case-finding algorithm, the average period prevalence of IBD across the nine organizations, standardized to the age- and gender-distribution of the US population, 2000 census, was 388 cases (95% CI, 378-397) per 100,000 persons (range 209-784 per 100,000; average follow-up 26 months). The prevalence of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and unspecified IBD was 129, 191, and 69 per 100,000, respectively.
The observed average prevalence was similar to prevalence proportions reported for other North American populations (369-408 per 100,000). Additional research is needed to understand differences in the occurrence of IBD among diverse populations as well as practice variation in diagnosis and treatment of IBD.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Immunomodulator (IM) treatments in ulcerative colitis (UC) are not curative and carry increased risk of complications, sometimes leading to therapy changes, reduced treatment benefits, and eventual relapse. We assessed patterns of IM utilization and therapy changes, complications, and disease relapse in a real-world population of patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Methods: Claims data from a large commercially insured U. S. population were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were (1) >= 2 UC diagnosis claims (ICD-9-CM 556.xx) between January 2005 and July 2010, (2) >= 1 IM claim, where first IM claim defined the index date, (3) >= 12 months preindex health plan enrollment (baseline), and (4) >= 24 months postindex plan enrollment (follow-up). Characteristics of and changes to the index IM therapy during follow-up were descriptively assessed, as were complications and disease relapses. Results: A total of 2136 patients were identified for inclusion (age, mean [SD], 46 [16] years, 54% female). Azathioprine was the most common index IM (46% of patients), followed by 6-mercaptopurine (28%). Switching from the index IM to another therapy class was common (21% of patients), with 5-ASAs (48% of switchers), oral corticosteroids (21%), and biologics (17%) being the most frequent next agents used. Augmentation was also common (25% of patients), with 5-ASA being, by far, the most frequent agent added to the index IM (72% of augmenters). Thirty percent of patients experienced a complication, and 73% of patients relapsed, with the majority of relapses occurring during index IM exposure. Conclusions: This assessment of IM treatments for UC demonstrated frequent changes to therapy and high downstream complication and relapse rates.
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 06/2014; 20(8). DOI:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000089 · 5.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 10% to 15% of individuals, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is difficult to classify as ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Previous work has demonstrated that probe-based elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) can produce spectra, informed by parameters like tissue ultrastructure and hemoglobin content, capable of differentiating pathologies. This study investigates whether ESS is an in vivo optical biomarker for the presence, activity, and type of IBD in the colon. Pilot study, a retrospective data analysis. ESS spectra of endoscopically normal and inflamed colon were obtained from 48 patients with IBD and 46 non-IBD controls. Measurements from patients with IBD were categorized as CD or UC based on clinical diagnosis. Spectra were analyzed using high-dimensional methods. Leave-one-patient-out cross-validation was used to obtain diagnostic performance estimates. Patients with IBD were distinguishable from non-IBD controls with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.91 based on readings from endoscopically normal mucosa, and 0.94 and 0.93 from inflamed mucosa. In patients with IBD, histologically normal and inflamed colon were distinguishable with per-class accuracies of 0.83 and 0.89, respectively; histologically normal from inactive inflammation with accuracies of 0.73 and 0.89, respectively; and inactive from active colitis with accuracies of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The diagnosis of CD versus UC was made with per-class accuracies of 0.92 and 0.87 in normal and 0.87 and 0.85 in inflamed mucosa, respectively. ESS, a simple, low-cost clinically friendly optical biopsy modality, has the potential to enhance the endoscopic assessment of IBD and its activity in real time and may help to distinguish CD from UC.
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 05/2014; DOI:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000058 · 5.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are not uniformly effective, thus necessitating dose changes, switching, and augmentation and carry adverse event risk, often requiring discontinuation, which reduces treatment benefits.AimTo assess continuity of and changes to initial CD and UC treatments, as well as costs associated with specific parameters defining suboptimal therapy.Methods Commercial US insurance claims (2006–2010) were retrospectively analysed. CD and UC patients receiving monotherapy with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), corticosteroids (CS), immunomodulators (IM) or biologics were included. Continuity of and changes to initial (index) therapy and associated costs (2011 US$) were assessed over 12 months following therapy initiation. Suboptimal therapy included discontinuation or switch (except for CS), dose escalation, augmentation, inadequate loading (biologics only), prolonged CS use (>3 months), surgery or hospitalisation.ResultsThe study included 13 005 CD and 19 878 UC patients. Augmentation was a common index therapy change (~20% of 5-ASA initiators, ~40% of CS initiators, ≥40% of IM initiators and 26–55% of biologic initiators) in both CD and UC patients. Approximately 50% of CD and UC 5-ASA initiators discontinued/interrupted treatment. Approximately 80% of CD and UC patients had ≥1 suboptimal therapy marker. Mean all-cause total costs per CD patient were significantly higher in those with vs. without suboptimal therapy ($18 736 vs. $10 878; P < 0.001); in UC, the disparity was smaller ($12 679 vs. $9653; P < 0.001).Conclusions Frequent dose and treatment changes were observed in all classes of initial UC and CD treatments. The economic impact of suboptimal therapy among UC and CD patients is substantial.
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 04/2014; DOI:10.1111/apt.12727 · 4.55 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
5 Downloads
Available from
Sep 15, 2014