Mental health screening in schools.

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center for School Mental Health Analysis and Action, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Journal of School Health (Impact Factor: 1.66). 03/2007; 77(2):53-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00167.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article discusses the importance of screening students in schools for emotional/behavioral problems.
Elements relevant to planning and implementing effective mental health screening in schools are considered. Screening in schools is linked to a broader national agenda to improve the mental health of children and adolescents. Strategies for systematic planning for mental health screening in schools are presented.
Mental health screening in schools is a very important, yet sensitive, agenda that is in its very early stages. Careful planning and implementation of mental health screening in schools offers a number of benefits including enhancing outreach and help to youth in need, and mobilizing school and community efforts to promote student mental health while reducing barriers to their learning.
When implemented with appropriate family, school, and community involvement, mental health screening in schools has the potential to be a cornerstone of a transformed mental health system. Screening, as part of a coordinated and comprehensive school mental health program, complements the mission of schools, identifies youth in need, links them to effective services, and contributes to positive educational outcomes valued by families, schools, and communities.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Internalizing disorders, specifically depression and anxiety, affect up to 14 and 32 % of youth, respectively (Merikangas et al. in J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49:980-989, 2010). In part to overcome barriers to receiving community services, schools have become a major provider of mental health services to children. Schools need effective mechanisms in place to accurately identify students who may need such services. The current study examined the accuracy of one such method, teacher nominations, in identifying elementary school children who self-report elevated levels of depression and/or anxiety. Participants were 238 fourth and fifth-grade students within a large, urban school district in a southeastern state and their 26 classroom teachers. Regarding sensitivity, teachers identified 50 and 40.7 % of students who repeatedly reported at-risk levels of depression and anxiety, respectively. Teachers falsely identified as symptomatic 16.2 and 17.5 % of students with typical levels of depression and anxiety, respectively. These findings suggest teachers can identify approximately half of children who experience at-risk levels of depression and anxiety, but substantial miss rates call into question this method for use as either an alternative to universal screenings or as an initial step (gatekeeper role) in a multi-modal identification process.
    School Mental Health 12/2014; 6(4):237-250. DOI:10.1007/s12310-014-9125-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies have shown that ethnic background hinders clinician detection of autistic features in children from non-western minority groups. The use of a structured instrument during evaluation of these children can reduce the risk of hindered detection. The aims of the current studies were to establish the extent of school-based professionals’ involvement in detecting autism and to replicate earlier findings of autism detection amongst school mentors. Results showed that school-based professionals were reported to be the first to suspect autistic features in 20% of children later diagnosed with autism. Additionally, school-based professionals refer to autism more often when judging children from majority than children from minority groups. However, using a structured instrument did not eliminate this bias. Providing these professionals with culture-sensitive education may help maximise their involvement in detecting autism amongst children from all ethnic backgrounds.
    Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 11/2014; 9. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.013 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although it is widely known that the occurrence of depression increases over the course of adolescence, symptoms of mood disorders frequently go undetected. While schools are viable settings for conducting universal screening to systematically identify students in need of services for common health conditions, particularly those that adversely affect school performance, few school districts routinely screen their students for depression. Among the most commonly referenced barriers are concerns that the number of students identified may exceed schools' service delivery capacities, but few studies have evaluated this concern systematically. System dynamics (SD) modeling may prove a useful approach for answering questions of this sort. The goal of the current paper is therefore to demonstrate how SD modeling can be applied to inform implementation decisions in communities. In our demonstration, we used SD modeling to estimate the additional service demand generated by universal depression screening in a typical high school. We then simulated the effects of implementing "compensatory approaches" designed to address anticipated increases in service need through (1) the allocation of additional staff time and (2) improvements in the effectiveness of mental health interventions. Results support the ability of screening to facilitate more rapid entry into services and suggest that improving the effectiveness of mental health services for students with depression via the implementation of an evidence-based treatment protocol may have a limited impact on overall recovery rates and service availability. In our example, the SD approach proved useful in informing systems' decision-making about the adoption of a new school mental health service.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10488-015-0628-y · 3.44 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 1, 2014