Effect of ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol on breast density in postmenopausal women.
ABSTRACT Women with higher mammographic breast density have increased risk for breast cancer, and there is some evidence that a change in breast density may be a marker for change in risk for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 2 years of treatment with ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol results in a change in breast density.
The Ultra-Low-dose Transdermal Estradiol Assessment was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 2 years of treatment with unopposed ultra-low-dose (0.014 mg/d) transdermal estradiol for prevention of osteoporosis in 417 postmenopausal women with no history of breast cancer who had not had a hysterectomy. We obtained mammograms at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of treatment from 276 of the participants. Right craniocaudal views were analyzed at a central radiology facility by a trained clinician blinded to treatment group and order of acquisition. Contour analysis was performed to define dense areas versus fatty tissue. Between-group differences in mean change in percent breast density from baseline to 1 and to 2 years of follow-up were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for clinical site.
Participants were 66 +/- 5 years old and 94% were white. The average percent breast density at baseline was 34%. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in percent breast density after 1 year (between-group difference, 0.1%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 1.6%) or 2 years of treatment (0.8%; -0.6% to 2.1%).
Two years of treatment with ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol did not increase breast density.
SourceAvailable from: Sebastian Carranza Lira[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Long time ago hormone therapy has had several indications during climacteric. However, after WHI study, its use has been reconsidered. According to several current consensus, hormone therapy must be prescribed to control vasomotor symptoms; low-doses are associated with lower risks than conventional doses. Multiple studies report benefits of low-dose and ultra low-dose of hormone therapy during cli - macteric. Here we review the literature on low and ultra low hormone therapy doses used in climacteric women, an alternative that must
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objective: To update for both clinicians and the lay public the evidence-based position statement published by The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) in July 2008 regarding its recommendations for menopausal hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal women, with consideration for the therapeutic benefit-risk ratio at various times through menopause and beyond. Methods: An Advisory Panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of women_s health was enlisted to review the July 2008 NAMS position statement, evaluate new evidence through an evidence-based analysis, and reach consensus on recommendations. The Panel_s recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees as an official NAMS position statement. Also participating in the review process were other interested organizations who then endorsed the document. Results: Current evidence supports a consensus regarding the role of HT in postmenopausal women, when potential therapeutic benefits and risks around the time of menopause are considered. This paper lists all these areas along with explanatory comments. Areas that vary from the 2008 position statement are noted. A suggested reading list of key references published since the last statement is also provided. Conclusions: Recent data support the initiation of HT around the time of menopause to treat menopause-related symptoms; to treat or reduce the risk of certain disorders, such as osteoporosis or fractures in select postmenopausal women; or both. The benefit-risk ratio for menopausal HT is favorable for women who initiate HT close to menopause but decreases in older women and with time since menopause in previously untreated women.Menopause 03/2010; 15(4 Pt 1). DOI:10.1097/gme.0b013e31817b076a · 2.81 Impact Factor
Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 08/2014; DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000000316 · 2.81 Impact Factor