Differential roles of Rap1 and Rap2 small GTPases in neurite retraction and synapse elimination in hippocampal spiny neurons.

Georgetown University Medical School, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Journal of Neurochemistry (Impact Factor: 4.24). 02/2007; 100(1):118-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04195.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Rap family of small GTPases is implicated in the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, particularly synaptic depression. Here we studied the role of Rap in neuronal morphogenesis and synaptic transmission in cultured neurons. Constitutively active Rap2 expressed in hippocampal pyramidal neurons caused decreased length and complexity of both axonal and dendritic branches. In addition, Rap2 caused loss of dendritic spines and spiny synapses, and an increase in filopodia-like protrusions and shaft synapses. These Rap2 morphological effects were absent in aspiny interneurons. In contrast, constitutively active Rap1 had no significant effect on axon or dendrite morphology. Dominant-negative Rap mutants increased dendrite length, indicating that endogenous Rap restrains dendritic outgrowth. The amplitude and frequency of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA)-mediated miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) decreased in hippocampal neurons transfected with active Rap1 or Rap2, associated with reduced surface and total levels of AMPA receptor subunit GluR2. Finally, increasing synaptic activity with GABA(A) receptor antagonists counteracted Rap2's inhibitory effect on dendrite growth, and masked the effects of Rap1 and Rap2 on AMPA-mediated mEPSCs. Rap1 and Rap2 thus have overlapping but distinct actions that potentially link the inhibition of synaptic transmission with the retraction of axons and dendrites.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neurobiology of fear is a large cellular configuration that implies the group activity of a large number of neurons. These connections suffer changes along the life cycle in a cellular activity-dependant process. This changes the effectiveness of the synaptic communication, facilitating the unchaining process of fear. Hence, the objective of this review is to describe the physiological process that cause those changes in fear, which begin with the activation of ionics and metabotropics receptors, and ending with the genomic stimulation and protein synthesis. Additionally, this paper explains the relation of fear while memories associated with it are established, as a factor that contributes to a higher frequency of discharging and cellular depolarization that favors long term changes due to intense neural excitation. In conclusion, fear can be neurobiologically strengthened after aversive stimulations, by the formation of associations between stimuli, as well as between them and the context, encouraging the organism to have a more efficient reactivity regarding a later meeting with the same threat or circumstance.
    06/2010; 9(1):47-63.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SynGAP is a neuron-specific Ras and Rap GTPase-activating protein (GAP) found in high concentration in the postsynaptic density (PSD) fraction from mammalian forebrain. We have previously shown that, in situ in the PSD fraction or in recombinant form in Sf9 cell membranes, synGAP is phosphorylated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), another prominent component of the PSD. Here we show that recombinant synGAP (r-synGAP), lacking 102 residues at the N-terminus, can be purified in soluble form and is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) as well as by CaMKII. Phos-phorylation of r-synGAP by CaMKII increases its HRas GAP activity by 25% and its Rap1 GAP activity by 76%. Conversely, phosphorylation by CDK5 increases r-synGAPs HRas GAP activity by 98% and its Rap1 GAP activity by 20%. Thus, phosphorylation by both kinases increases synGAP activity, but CaMKII shifts the relative GAP activity toward inactivation of Rap1; whereas CDK5 shifts the relative activity toward inactivation of HRas. GAP activity toward Rap2 is not altered by phosphorylation by either kinase. CDK5 phosphorylates synGAP primarily at two sites, S773 and S802. Phosphorylation at S773 inhibits r-synGAP activity, whereas phosphorylation at S802 increases it. However, the net effect of concurrent phosphorylation of both sites, S773 and S802, is an increase in GAP activity. SynGAP is phosphorylated at S773 and S802 in the PSD fraction, and its phosphorylation by CDK5 and CaMKII is differentially regulated by activation of NMDA-type glutamate receptors in cultured neurons. Copyright © 2014, The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 02/2015; 290(8):4908-4927. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M114.614420 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The complex effects of stress on learning and memory are mediated, in part, by stress-induced changes in the composition and structure of excitatory synapses. In the hippocampus, the effects of stress involve several factors including glucocorticoids and the stress-released neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), which influence the integrity of dendritic spines and the structure and function of the excitatory synapses they carry. CRH, at nanomolar, presumed-stress levels, rapidly abolishes short-term synaptic plasticity and destroys dendritic spines, yet the mechanisms for these effects are not fully understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that glutamate receptor-mediated processes, which shape synaptic structure and function, are engaged by CRH and contribute to spine destabilization. In cultured rat hippocampal neurons, CRH application reduced dendritic spine density in a time- and dose-dependent manner, and this action depended on the CRH receptor type 1. CRH-mediated spine loss required network activity and the activation of NMDA, but not of AMPA receptors; indeed GluR1-containing dendritic spines were resistant to CRH. Downstream of NMDA receptors, the calcium-dependent enzyme, calpain, was recruited, resulting in the breakdown of spine actin-interacting proteins including spectrin. Pharmacological approaches demonstrated that calpain recruitment contributed critically to CRH-induced spine loss. In conclusion, the stress hormone CRH co-opts mechanisms that contribute to the plasticity and integrity of excitatory synapses, leading to selective loss of dendritic spines. This spine loss might function as an adaptive mechanism preventing the consequences of adverse memories associated with severe stress.
    The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 10/2013; 33(43):16945-60. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1445-13.2013 · 6.75 Impact Factor


1 Download