Article

The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies.

Skaraborg Institute, Skovde, Sweden.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 02/2007; 15(1):197-208. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.536
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To validate self-reported information on weight and height in an adult population and to find a useful algorithm to assess the prevalence of obesity based on self-reported information.
This was a cross-sectional survey consisting of 1703 participants (860 men and 843 women, 30 to 75 years old) conducted in the community of Vara, Sweden, from 2001 to 2003. Self-reported weight, height, and corresponding BMI were compared with measured data. Obesity was defined as measured BMI > or = 30 kg/m2. Information on education, self-rated health, smoking habits, and physical activity during leisure time was collected by a self-administered questionnaire.
Mean differences between measured and self-reported weight were 1.6 kg (95% confidence interval, 1.4; 1.8) in men and 1.8 kg (1.6; 2.0) in women (measured higher), whereas corresponding differences in height were -0.3 cm (-0.5; -0.2) in men and -0.4 cm (-0.5; -0.2) in women (measured lower). Age and body size were important factors for misreporting height, weight, and BMI in both men and women. Obesity (measured) was found in 156 men (19%) and 184 women (25%) and with self-reported data in 114 men (14%) and 153 women (20%). For self-reported data, the sensitivity of obesity was 70% in men and 82% in women, and when adjusted for corrected self-reported data and age, it increased to 81% and 90%, whereas the specificity decreased from 99% in both sexes to 97% in men and 98% in women.
The prevalence of obesity based on self-reported BMI can be estimated more accurately when using an algorithm adjusted for variables that are predictive for misreporting.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
147 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cross-sectional analyses of national data have found that persons with high baseline body mass index (BMI) gain weight faster than persons at the median and that those whose weight was below the median gain very little weight. However, it is not clear whether these population-level changes reflect patterns at the individual level. We examined longitudinal changes in BMI in initially underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese US men and women using individual-level repeat data from the Health and Retirement Study (n = 15,895; age range, 40-69 years at baseline). Linear mixed-effect regression was used to model 6-year change in self-reported BMI during 4 study periods (1992/1994-1998/2000, 1996/1998-2002/2004, 2000/2002-2006/2008, and 2004-2010). In the first 6-year period, the mean increase in BMI was greatest among persons who were initially normal weight (0.3 kg/m [95% confidence interval = 0.2 to 0.4]) and overweight (0.2 kg/m [0.1 to 0.3]). Weight gain accelerated in these groups with each subsequent period. Weight gain was less for initially class-I obese participants, and a net decrease in BMI was observed for class-III obese participants. These analyses suggest that the change in mean BMI among middle-aged and older US adults between 1992 and 2010 resulted mainly from accelerated weight gain among persons who were initially normal weight and overweight.
    Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 03/2015; 26(2):165-168. · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between five-year changes in occupational sitting and body mass index (BMI) in working adults.
    Preventive Medicine. 01/2015;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the association between five-year changes in occupational sitting and BMI in working adults. We analyzed data from The Danish Work Environment Cohort Study (2005 and 2010, n=3.482). Data on occupational sitting, weight, height and several potential confounders were self-reported. The association between change in occupational sitting (hours) (categorized as large decrease<- 7.5, moderate decrease - 7.5 to<- 2.5, no change - 2.5 to 2.5, moderate increase>2.5 to 7.5 and large increase>7.5) and change in BMI was explored by multiple linear regression analyses. 43.0 % men and 36.1 % women had high occupational sitting time (≥25hours per week) at baseline. 31.8 % men and 27.2 % women decreased while 30.0 % men and 33.0 % women increased occupational sitting. The proportion of obese (BMI≥30) increased almost 3 % for both genders. BMI changed 0.13 (CI: 0.06; 0.20, p=0.0003), per category of change in occupational sitting in women, but no association was found in men. In women, there is a positive association between five-year changes in occupational sitting and BMI in this study. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Preventive medicine. 01/2015;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
12 Downloads
Available from
Oct 13, 2014