Neuroanatomical correlates of personality in the elderly

Laboratory of Aging and Emotion, Psychiatric Neuroimaging Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Bldg. 149, CNY-2628, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. <>
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 04/2007; 35(1):263-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.039
Source: PubMed


Extraversion and neuroticism are two important and frequently studied dimensions of human personality. They describe individual differences in emotional responding that are quite stable across the adult lifespan. Neuroimaging research has begun to provide evidence that neuroticism and extraversion have specific neuroanatomical correlates within the cerebral cortex and amygdala of young adults. However, these brain areas undergo alterations in size with aging, which may influence the nature of these personality factor-brain structure associations in the elderly. One study in the elderly demonstrated associations between perisylvian cortex structure and measures of self transcendence [Kaasinen, V., Maguire, R.P., Kurki, T., Bruck, A., Rinne, J.O., 2005. Mapping brain structure and personality in late adulthood. NeuroImage 24, 315-322], but the neuroanatomical correlates of extraversion and neuroticism, or other measures of the Five Factor Model of personality have not been explored. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the structural correlates of neuroticism and extraversion in healthy elderly subjects (n=29) using neuroanatomic measures of the cerebral cortex and amygdala. We observed that the thickness of specific lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions, but not amygdala volume, correlates with measures of extraversion and neuroticism. The results suggest differences in the regional neuroanatomic correlates of specific personality traits with aging. We speculate that this relates to the influences of age-related structural changes in the PFC.

Download full-text


Available from: Bradford Dickerson, Jan 21, 2014
  • Source
    • "Most notably, the FFM domains of neuroticism and extraversion differed between groups of participants who have varying experiences with SI, as well as strongly predicted TB and PB. In the last two decades, research has linked these personality domains to activity and structural differences in brain regions associated with the processing of affective stimuli and emotional responsiveness (Wright et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2008 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has demonstrated an inconsistent relationship between suicide ideation and personality traits. This is the first study to empirically examine the relationship of the Five Factor Model of personality with current, past and no suicide ideation, and with the two interpersonal risk factors of suicide: thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness (Joiner, 2005). Results indicate that high neuroticism was associated with both current ideation and a history of suicide ideation and extraversion was associated with current ideation. Neuroticism was positively related to thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, while extraversion was negatively related to these interpersonal predictors of suicide. Agreeableness was negatively related to thwarted belongingness but not perceived burdensomeness, indicating differentiated patterns of relationships between this personality domain and the two suicide constructs. Furthermore, these personality domains predicted 23.82% of variance for thwarted belongingness and 15.07% of the variance for perceived burdensomeness, above and beyond demographic variables associated with suicide ideation. This study, which was conducted with a college sample, demonstrates the potential benefit of identifying predispositional risk factors for suicide ideation and interpersonal predictors of suicide. This may have implications for the development of upstream preventative measures against suicide.
    Psychiatry Research 01/2015; 226(1). DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.002 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Similarly, a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study found that " ideas " , an openness facet, was significantly correlated with the left DLPFC activity during a working memory task (DeYoung et al., 2009). Two further structural MRI studies reported a positive correlation between gray-matter volume in different PFC areas and openness (Hu et al., 2011; Kapogiannis et al., 2013), although these findings have not been consistently replicated (Bjornebekk et al., 2013; DeYoung et al., 2010; Taki et al., 2013; Wright et al., 2007). A way to improve our knowledge of the brain mechanisms underlying openness is to investigate the connectivity within specific circuits rather than exploring the activity and/or structure of single regions per se. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Openness is a personality trait reflecting absorption in sensory experience, preference for novelty, and creativity, and is thus considered a driving force of human evolution. At the brain level, a relation between openness and dopaminergic circuits has been proposed, although evidence to support this hypothesis is lacking. Recent behavioral research has also found that people with mania, a psychopathological condition linked to dopaminergic dysfunctions, may display high levels of openness. However, whether openness is related to dopaminergic circuits has not been determined thus far.
    NeuroImage 09/2014; 104. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.017 · 6.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In contrast to other personality traits, [17,28] statistical adjustment for late-life physical, cognitive and social activities in the current study did not affect the association of harm avoidance with progressive parkinsonism. Both harm avoidance and motor function in older people are preferentially associated with structural changes in specific brain regions including cortical and cerebellar structures which might account for their association in this study [29-33]. Thus, higher levels of harm avoidance may be lead to stress-related changes in neurotransmitters (e.g., cortisol or dopamine) causing brain atrophy, damaging motor-related brain regions or decreasing the brain’s capacity (motor reserve) to tolerate ongoing neurodegeneration and the accumulation of other neuropathologies [34-37]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We tested the hypothesis that harm avoidance, a trait associated with behavioral inhibition, is associated with the rate of change in parkinsonism in older adults. At baseline harm avoidance was assessed with a standard self-report instrument in 969 older people without dementia participating in the Rush Memory and Aging Project, a longitudinal community-based cohort study. Parkinsonism was assessed annually with a modified version of the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (mUPDRS). Average follow-up was 5 years. A linear mixed-effects model controlling for age, sex and education showed that for an average participant (female, 80 years old at baseline, with 14 years of education and a harm avoidance score of 10), the overall severity of parkinsonism increased by about 0.05 unit/ year (Estimate, 0.054, S.E., 0.007, p <0.001) and that the level of harm avoidance was associated with the progression of parkinsonism (Estimate, 0.004, S.E., 0.001, p <0.001). Thus, for an average participant, every 6 point (~1 SD) increase in harm avoidance score at baseline, the rate of progression of parkinsonism increased about 50% compared to an individual with an average harm avoidance score. This amount of change in parkinsonism over the course of the study was associated with about a 5% increased risk of death. The association between harm avoidance and progression of parkinsonism persisted when controlling for cognitive function, depressive symptoms, loneliness, neuroticism, late-life cognitive, social and physical activities and chronic health conditions. A higher level of the harm avoidance trait is associated with a more rapid progression of parkinsonism in older adults.
    BMC Geriatrics 04/2014; 14(1):54. DOI:10.1186/1471-2318-14-54 · 1.68 Impact Factor
Show more