Article

Primary production in headwater streams of the Seine basin: the Grand Morin river case study.

Centre de Géosciences, UMR Sisyphe, ENSMP, 35, rue Saint-Honoré, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France.
Science of The Total Environment (Impact Factor: 3.16). 05/2007; 375(1-3):98-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Periphytic biomass has an important influence on the water quality of many shallow streams. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the knowledge obtained on periphyton during the PIREN Seine research program. Periphyton was sampled using chl a measurements by acetone extraction and oxygen measurements with microelectrodes. The experiments reveal the presence of an important fixed biomass ranging between 123 and 850 mgchl a m(-2) and the mean gross production (photosynthesis) is shown to range between 180 and 315 mgC m(-2) h(-1). An independent approach was performed using the ProSe model, which simulates transport and biogeochemical processes in 22 km of the Grand Morin stream. A strong agreement between in situ measurements and the model results was obtained. The gross production obtained using ProSe is 220 mgC m(-2) h(-1) for the periphyton, which matches the experimental data. Although the net photosynthetic activity of the phytoplankton (0.84 gC gC(-1) d(-1)) is higher than the periphytic one (0.33 gC gC(-1) d(-1)), the absolute periphytic activity is greater since the mean biomass (3.4 gC m(-)(2)) is 10 times higher than the phytoplanktonic one (0.3 gC m(-2)), due to the short residence time of the water body (1.5d).

0 Bookmarks
 · 
108 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article shows how geostatistics can be used to reduce distributed physically based model (DPBM) uncertainties when assessing nitrate concentrations along a 250-km stretch of the Seine River. First of all, co-kriging is used to build a set of boundary conditions (BCs) (inlet concentrations from major tributary rivers) consistent with validation data. It partially addresses the issues of errors in data used as model input and errors in data to be compared with model outputs. Then the analysis of temporal variograms (simple variograms of observed and simulated concentrations, and their cross-variogram) reveals a clear mismatch between simulated and observed values that was not detected by classical objective functions [root mean squared error (RMSE), etc.]. Variograms appear to include three components representing three different time scales: sub-weekly, monthly and annual scales. Mismatches between simulated and observed values are analysed as (i) wrong quantification of inputs to the river (especially during the rainy period: combined sewer overflow (CSO), waste water treatment plant (WWTP) and tributary contributions to the nitrate fluxes in the Seine River) and (ii) wrong description of physical processes within the river. Finally, the modelling of simple and cross-variograms appears to be a sensitive analysis tool which can be used to describe and reduce modelling uncertainties
    Hydrological Processes 06/2011; 25(2):217-233. · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nitrates fluxes in the Grand Morin basin (1200 km(2)), that is subjected to intense agricultural pressure, are considered using in-stream observations (around 250 sampling days over 5 years) and physically based simulations using the CAWAQS model (CAtchment WAter Quality Simulator). In-stream nitrate concentration averaged 6 mg N L(-1), increasing by approximately 0.2 mg N L(-1) yr(-1) around this value (period 1991-1996). Our results show that, over the period of 1991-1996, the differences between in-stream observed nitrate concentrations and simulated nitrate concentrations result from nitrate losses at the basin scale. These losses are due to denitrification by transfer through wetlands, alluvial plains, the hyporheic zone, and by benthic processes in rivers. A mean annual mass balance at the basin scale indicates that 40% of the infiltration flux (3360 kg N km(-2) yr(-1)) is removed from the system via the river network, 40% is stored in aquifers and 20% is lost by denitrification (period 1991-1996).
    Science of The Total Environment 05/2007; 375(1-3):69-79. · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of anfis (adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system) for interpolating hydraulic head in a 40-km2 agricultural watershed of the Seine basin (France). Inputs of anfis are Cartesian coordinates and the elevation of the ground. Hydraulic head was measured at 73 locations during a snapshot campaign on September 2009, which characterizes low-water-flow regime in the aquifer unit. The dataset was then split into three subsets using a square-based selection method: a calibration one (55%), a training one (27%), and a test one (18%).First, a method is proposed to select the best anfis model, which corresponds to a sensitivity analysis of anfis to the type and number of membership functions (MF). Triangular, Gaussian, general bell, and spline-based MF are used with 2, 3, 4, and 5 MF per input node. Performance criteria on the test subset are used to select the 5 best anfis models among 16. Then each is used to interpolate the hydraulic head distribution on a (50×50)-m grid, which is compared to the soil elevation. The cells where the hydraulic head is higher than the soil elevation are counted as “error cells.” The anfis model that exhibits the less “error cells” is selected as the best anfis model. The best model selection reveals that anfis models are very sensitive to the type and number of MF. Finally, a sensibility analysis of the best anfis model with four triangular MF is performed on the interpolation grid, which shows that anfis remains stable to error propagation with a higher sensitivity to soil elevation.
    Computers & Geosciences 01/2012; 38:43-51. · 1.83 Impact Factor